Clefan98

Yeah, that isn't entirely true. The newish owner of the building and Carol (former owner of Lat 41) never got along. The decision to close Latitude was 100% due to owner/tenant issues that couldn't be worked out. She's currently looking for other options along Detroit Ave, but hasn't had any luck finding a spot that will meet her needs. Carol would like to focus more time on her catering business, while still operating a small cafe.

Detroit Shoreway to Welcome Flight Cleveland, a Wine Shop and Bar, This Fall For years, Lindsay Smith has been obsessed with wine. Come autumn, she’ll be surrounded by it. That’s when she’ll open Flight Cleveland, a wine shop and bar, in the former home of Latitude 41n (5712 Detroit Ave.) in the Detroit Shoreway neighborhood. “Flight is something that has been bouncing around in my head for many, many years,” explains Smith, formerly Bon Appétit’s Director of Catering and Sales at the Cleveland Museum of Art. “It started out as a passion project; all of my travels were becoming wine focused, all of the sudden I was getting my wine certification and becoming the resident wine nerd among all of my friends. https://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2018/05/22/detroit-shoreway-to-welcome-flight-cleveland-a-wine-shop-and-bar-this-fall

Does Lucky's offer sushi in their prepared foods section? If not a sushi place would be a great fit there. Yes, they do, and it's actually pretty good sushi too.

We're very happy with our decision to stay and raise our family in Ohio City. Crime (mostly due to drugs) and the quality of schools in the suburbs aren't quite what they used to be when we were growing up.

Frontier Airlines adds limited, nonstop service between Cleveland and San Antonio; introductory fare is $59 one way CLEVELAND, Ohio - Frontier Airlines is adding limited, nonstop service between Cleveland and San Antonio, Texas, starting in August. It will be the 14th destination for Frontier, which has added and subtracted numerous routes from Cleveland Hopkins in recent years, trying to figure out what works at the airport in the wake of United Airlines' cutbacks in Cleveland since 2014. https://www.cleveland.com/travel/index.ssf/2018/05/frontier_airlines_adds_limited.html

3 Ohio cities among top 10 metros where $100 will go the furthest (tied 1) Cincinnati, Ohio Prices 10.8% lower than U.S. average Value of $100: $112.11 https://www.cleveland.com/expo/erry-2018/05/b9c40ab8b0731/here_are_the_top_10_areas_wher.html#incart_m-rpt-1

I'll take it...these small wins add up!

Mex Tex is opening in the former Vita Urbana location.

The former Arcadian spot just sold for 744k. According to Robert Maschke's Facebook page we could be seeing the reopening of Arcadian part deux. Has anyone heard rumors? 6416 DETROIT AVE CLEVELAND Sales Date 4/11/2018 Amount $744,000 Buyer GORDON SQUARE RE, LLC

All I took from this is I need to get to Hot Springs asap

Personally, I’m more embarrassed by the Reds than I am the Browns. What a disaster of a franchise.

Needed? The shot you posted looks like a terrible location for a stadium. Surrounded by freeways and industry...that'd make a great impression to visitors. I get it. Stadiums are sexy projects, and everyone loves to dream about the mega project. But 9 times out of 10, stadiums have very little effect on their surroundings, especially ones that are used only a handful of times per year. Of all the things Cleveland needs, though, I really can't think of a lower priority than a new Browns stadium. You all know your city better than me, but I can't get behind demolishing a perfectly fine and nice stadium that's less than 20 years old. It's a waste of money, waste of materials, bad for the environment, and it's unnecessary. Especially without a solid plan in place for the lakefront, this idea seems nonsensical. They're talking about building this 10yrs from now which means the stadium will be 30yrs old, not 20. Also no details about financing, location, etc. have been announced, so it's probably best to wait and hear the details before jumping to any conclusions. Plans for the lakefront have already been approved and started. Site 1 of phase 1 is complete, and site 2 of phase 1 is nearing completion. It helps if you understand the city before chiming in. http://www.gcpartnership.com/fileuploader/webfiles/Cleveland%20Harbor%20View%20Lakefront%20Development%20Presentation-GCP%2017.5.15.pdf Ok, go for it. Cleveland has a shining track record when it comes to chasing the mega project. The east side of the city is crumbling and the transit system is in dire need of assistance, and the amenities that currently are on the lakefrthe ont are accessible from one street. But sure, go ahead and build another stadium for the Browns. Did you read the article? It's very, very early discussion of something that may or may never happen. We're talking about something 10 years from now. Also, the city isn't chasing this project. The Browns approached the city and county to ask for their input. You act as if Cleveland is the only city building stadiums. Cincinnati is about build a 250 million soccer stadium with the city subsidizing 50 million of that. Maybe Cincinnati should put that 50 million into the streetcar. Yeah, agree, I really don't think the city/county should foot the bill, but nothing in the article indicates that's going to happen. It's obvious he didn't read anything before expressing his nonsensical opinion. He should spend his time worrying about the deal the bungals made when they fleeced Cincinnati for 427mil in addition to yearly maintenance fees.

Needed? The shot you posted looks like a terrible location for a stadium. Surrounded by freeways and industry...that'd make a great impression to visitors. I get it. Stadiums are sexy projects, and everyone loves to dream about the mega project. But 9 times out of 10, stadiums have very little effect on their surroundings, especially ones that are used only a handful of times per year. Of all the things Cleveland needs, though, I really can't think of a lower priority than a new Browns stadium. You all know your city better than me, but I can't get behind demolishing a perfectly fine and nice stadium that's less than 20 years old. It's a waste of money, waste of materials, bad for the environment, and it's unnecessary. Especially without a solid plan in place for the lakefront, this idea seems nonsensical. They're talking about building this 10yrs from now which means the stadium will be 30yrs old, not 20. Also no details about financing, location, etc. have been announced, so it's probably best to wait and hear the details before jumping to any conclusions. Plans for the lakefront have already been approved and started. Site 1 of phase 1 is complete, and site 2 of phase 1 is nearing completion. It helps if you understand the city before chiming in. http://www.gcpartnership.com/fileuploader/webfiles/Cleveland%20Harbor%20View%20Lakefront%20Development%20Presentation-GCP%2017.5.15.pdf Ok, go for it. Cleveland has a shining track record when it comes to chasing the mega project. The east side of the city is crumbling and the transit system is in dire need of assistance, and the amenities that currently are on the lakefront are accessible from one street. But sure, go ahead and build another stadium for the Browns. Did you even read my response? Your panties are in a bunch for no reason. NO FINANCING DETAILS HAVE BEEN ANNOUNCED YET. There's no need for you to chime in regarding something you know very little about.

Needed? The shot you posted looks like a terrible location for a stadium. Surrounded by freeways and industry...that'd make a great impression to visitors. I get it. Stadiums are sexy projects, and everyone loves to dream about the mega project. But 9 times out of 10, stadiums have very little effect on their surroundings, especially ones that are used only a handful of times per year. Of all the things Cleveland needs, though, I really can't think of a lower priority than a new Browns stadium. You all know your city better than me, but I can't get behind demolishing a perfectly fine and nice stadium that's less than 20 years old. It's a waste of money, waste of materials, bad for the environment, and it's unnecessary. Especially without a solid plan in place for the lakefront, this idea seems nonsensical. They're talking about building this 10yrs from now which means the stadium will be 30yrs old, not 20. Also no details about financing, location, etc. have been announced, so it's probably best to wait and hear the details before jumping to any conclusions. Plans for the lakefront have already been approved and started. Site 1 of phase 1 is complete, and site 2 of phase 1 is nearing completion. It helps if you understand the city before chiming in. http://www.gcpartnership.com/fileuploader/webfiles/Cleveland%20Harbor%20View%20Lakefront%20Development%20Presentation-GCP%2017.5.15.pdf

If you want to see a bad deal look no further than the financing plan the bungals struck with Cincinnati. YIKES.

Actually, most cities subsidize NFL stadiums just like we do. Source: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19smEPxvpHQE3pByhDDPbyyA-SMdMjF5Y2uk-g_LkMZs/edit#gid=0 Over the last 20 years, the American public has spent more than $7 billion dollars to build or renovate NFL stadiums, taking on 46 percent of the total costs of those projects. https://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/nfl-new-stadiums-public-funding-how-much-atlanta-san-diego-minnesota-los-angeles-033116

Isn't Eco-Village north of Lorain? Yeah, my bad. These are north of Lorain

Nine new townhomes coming to W57th just south of Lorain in Detroit Shoreway. These prices are by the far the highest we've seen in this tiny sub section of the neighborhood: https://www.howardhanna.com/Property/Detail/SUB-LOT-2-Side-St-Cleveland-OH-44102/NorthernOH/3993307

Right! I think it's hilarious people get so worked up over trivial things such as this. Move on already..

They’re not.

Cleveland’s job growth isnt really stagnant if you look at the numbers I’ve posted since 2010.

^ Since March of 2010 Cleveland has added 82k jobs. Up 9k from MAR 17 to MAR 18. https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/SMU39174600000000001?amp%253bdata_tool=XGtable&output_view=data&include_graphs=true

Meanwhile: https://www.engadget.com/2017/06/13/tesla-model-x-earns-a-perfect-nhtsa-safety-rating/

An average of 3,500 people die daily in automobile accidents around the world. Happy cherry picking..

Why? Have you been inside of 1717, 668, leader or the Hanna building?