dski44

I agree, but I was thinking that the demand to be on Euclid between Public Square and E17th could outweigh the benefits and savings in building on an empty lot in another area of downtown. I don't know much about the building located at 1110 Euclid, the two-three story building in the pic below (I think that it is the correct address). But it appears there was once a taller building on this site. I was looking at the City Club Webcam and it stood out to me. This is a prime location.t

Any chance in the near future that we may see one or two of the smaller buildings (2-3 stories) on Euclid be demolished for larger ones? Euclid is filling up!

I love the view down Euclid...what a difference! Great pics!

Maybe this is one of the locations @KJP told the out-of-town investors about?

The top of the elevator core appears to have reached the 23rd floor!

Crane jump this week?

Also caught a good view of Scranton!

Something like this would fit there nicely!

Hmmmmm...the shaded area east of Erieview and south of the shoreway?

If true, this would justify a 2 billion investment into a domed stadium.

The rock hall is currently getting bad press by some for inducting Wilie Nelson. Maybe, eventually, this will be renamed the music hall of fame? Will this museum be as relevant in 30 years in its current form?

Can Hopkins accommodate wide-bodied 767-787's?

Here's another recent pic from another angle.

One thousand or more additional people on Euclid once finished! Huge!

While this property is in the City of Tallmadge, it is about 3 miles away from the city center. It borders Stow to the north and Kent/Franklin Township to the east. There are no walkable sidewalks on the main street and everybody would be car dependent. The only access to the proposed subdivision would be off of Northeast Ave. (ST RT 261), which already has traffic issues. The proposed subdivision calls for 280 housing units. The property has the Freedom Trail, railroad tracks and the Cuyahoga River to the north. Growth in the area is limited by the MetroParks and industry to the east. This area does not have the infrastructure to handle this type of development at this time. I would normally agree with having as much density as possible...but not a R-6 development in this location. The people who would move here would be relocating from denser areas. The developer will make a quick buck and leave the City with a lot of problems. See parcel Number 6008558. I dunno, maybe I'm just being a NIMBY.

The land owner just brought suit against the City of Tallmadge for blocking this development in federal court. The citizens are not against development in general. However they are against very dense R-6 development with 8000 square foot lots and house fifteen foot apart from one another. Every other development close by is R-1. The large majority group against it in this situation are very well informed and constituted a large part of the community that will be directly affected.

Several of my clients are requiring employees to return to the office due to a slow but steady decline in production and performance while working from home.

Looks like this project will top out in the middle of May......6 or so stories to go.

If the Haslems publicly state they they will be responsible for a modest portion of the cost of a new facility, I believe the public would support the efforts. This would be a great first step. We have a treasure in the lake. A treasure that is going to become increasingly valuable. We can't afford to miss on this opportunity to develop the lakefront. This is our opportunity to have an attraction like the "Riverwalk" in San Antonio or the "Harbor' in Baltimore. If we can develope the lakefront properly, it will be a destination for visitors and tourists.

The elevator shaft appears to have reached the height of the City Club Building!

If only we had a webcam!

And Geauga County?

Then, why is it required in Portage County?

Why isn't e-check required in Franklin county?

How about the underused building 2 doors down?