Jump to content

Jeff5112

Dirt Lot 0'
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Loved the Brian Tolle urns; wish they would make a comeback
  2. Especially, if you want to marry a millionaire. (See The Official "I Love Cleveland" Thread.)
  3. The 6/02/11 PD article did say a parking garage was included.
  4. Stopped by the Tudor Arms couple months ago and was greeted at the door and given a tour of all public rooms and a variety of the suites. Very gracious staff member appreciated showing the rooms with a view.
  5. It was pretty clear in the PD when Kasich & Gilbert reached their agreement.
  6. Seems like a world away from Gary.
  7. While you're tweaking the map, it would be great if you change the building color code to be different from the street color. (Everyone is a critic.) Very nice job; interesting to study.
  8. An interesting example: the GOP HQ in Columbus has its address listed as on S. 5th St., although there is no entrance on that side of the building; the front of the building and its entrance is on E. Rich St. Some PR work in hand.
  9. falt = flat
  10. Westside falt topography is probably one factor.
  11. Interesting, I was just going to say something similar to you and that we weren't going to solve anything here. But, regarding, again, the example: If you have lots of time to plan and during that period you have (or should have) a written binding agreements with all parties, it should be pretty difficult for one party to "change the rules". That is if you were minding the store/doing your job. By the way, I will not get personal in a discussion like this, but take down your psych shingle regarding me.
  12. Technical error on the train name in an example is minor, but what is major is the point that an important and expensive issue was on the table after construction start with so much planning involved.
  13. Wexner didn't contribute that big an amount or percentage, but ODOT pretty much contributed 100% of that year's capital improvement budget to the Easton interchange.
  14. Just reviewed the last link: I suggest on a lot of that purposefully exhaustive list someone learn to use "N/A" (Not Applicable) in filling in the blanks and move on. During the ten years of meetings did anyone speak up from the back of the room in the case of the Inner belt (This example used for illustrative purposes only, so not off topic.) and ask "By the by, do we have site control (purchase/lease agreement) for the CSX land?