3231

Some thoughts: -I thought that the Chester ramps were included in the last revision to the innerbelt plan. -While the west shoreway project will be great for the west side, the city didn't get all that they wanted. They really fought with ODOT to reduce it to 2 lanes each way. ODOT refused and will make it 3 lanes. That's a loss in my opinion. I hope that the lanes are not extra wide. -I heard that Chester's lanes are wider than the normal width. OC would have thinner lanes. -Not that this means anything, but many (well-connected) people talk about the OC as if its going to happen. From what I know of large capital projects, I wouldn't be so optimistic/pessimistic. Is there something else that we don't know about? - additional thoughts coming soon...

While this is a viable project, it can also be considered a bargaining chip. Either way, CIA would win. I would love to see an architecturally-sensitive residential building go on this site. Case doesn't really need the space, they just want it to keep their options open. Don't be surprised to see other similar projects proposed for this area. While many like to paint UCI as the agent of neighborhood destruction, that's history. There is a concentrated focus on adding market rate housing in the Circle. Just because you don't see it all the time in the PD doesn't mean that its not actively being pursued.

We subscribe to the New Urban News at my place of employment. It seems fairly reputable. I just read the article. It also talks about Stark's plan for the WHD and the lakefront. As mentioned, the article talks about the East Bank. Has anyone else heard that Wolstein wants to make the entire thing LEED-certified? Actually, it is called LEED-ND (neighborhood development). I'll reread the article, but it sure seemed like Wolstein wants to make this an example for how to properly do new urbanism.

^I have a coin jar that hasn't been emptied into Coinstar lately. I'm game.

Are you guys hearing the same rumors about Palmer? I keep hearing that they think he won't be able to play football again.

^The stops will be less frequent. The busses will have signal prioritization. The roadway will finally be smooth. You can argue all you want about whether the silverline is a good idea or not, but it will definitely be an upgrade on the 6.

Chicago is a city. Ohio is a state. States contain a variety of cities. Larger cities often times have zoos. :)

I think that Rhodes tower is enough of a "signature" building. ;) I wouldn't mind a signature building, but I would be happy enough with a strong urban design that foments street life.

^The auditor's market rate is not necessarily a valid appraisal.

I also disagree with the premise. Cleveland and its immediate neighborhoods offer different styles of urban living. I just signed a contract to purchase a home in Ohio City (a neighborhood just outside of downtown Cleveland). We never considered downtown because it does not offer the amenities that my wife, myself and our 7-month old son need. You will find some people who will choose between downtown and Ohio City, but in the end the improvement in each neighborhood develops a symbiotic relationship that will increase the appeal of each. Dayton, however, is a smaller market. I think that it would be more difficult for that city to develop many different nodes of improved urban life.

Not exactly on the topic.. While I would prefer that many of these inner-ring suburban projects were within the city, it will help to solidify the surrounding areas. With an increased focus on residential projects in University Circle, high-priced units on its fringe will help the market. Domain on Lee did not survive, but it would sadden me more if Derbyshire townhomes did not suceed. Cleveland Heights has a lot of property devoted to parking near Cedar-Fairmount. I would love to see the city start turning those spaces into townhomes.

All but one have sold. Good news for this area of Cleveland! On to Cleveland Heights: The Derbyshire Townhomes are also selling well. The last phase is under construction and 4 of the 6 units have pre-sold. They are little bit smaller than the last phase, but the developer has decided to raise the prices by $30,000 per unit. Given the increase in price, it speaks well for the market that they are selling so quickly.

Browns added their third Cleveland-area native of the free agency period today.

Its great to see the Browns adding some local stars to the lineup. --especially when one of those new signings is considered the top free agent in this year's class! Putting Cleveland in the Browns By Steve King, Staff Writer March 11, 2006 The word "Cleveland" was solidly put in front of "Browns" Saturday as free agency opened in whirlwind fashion here. Two of the three free agents the Browns signed - offensive lineman LeCharles Bentley, who comes from the New Orleans Saints and wide receiver Joe Jurevicius (NFC champion Seattle Seahawks) - are from the Greater Cleveland area. www.plaindealer.com

not yet.

^That's surprising. I would think that Pittsburgh would cover a lot of southeastern Ohio and WV due to its larger airport.

OK.. I've heard that the RFPs are in for the Triangle. There are at least 5 proposals. Some are better than others. Look for a choice by May.

CMH, I always wondered about Copa's symbol and how similar it is to Continental's. I always thought the similarity would be grounds for litigation. Considering that Continental owns 49%, it now makes sense. I am glad to see that a foreign carrier will be investing in Cleveland. If I ever were to travel to Mexico City, it would be heart-warming to see Cleveland on the departure/arrival screens.

I thought that Wolstein wanted to keep Shaia's property as surface lots. I'd rather have Shaia's project go forward.

I remember reading an interview with Rubin about the Square. He said that the condo tower could happen in the future. It definitely seemed like a back burner thing that he'd like to consider in a few years.

Mayday, Thanks for the photo.

You would need to add some amenities. I would like to see a sunken amphitheater. You need places where events can go on and where people will feel good about their surroundings. As is, each quadrant is surrounding by traffic on all four sides. If they were combined, you wouldn't feel as isolated. You need to be able to stretch out, play frisbee, watch a small concert.

I think that the Flats project is grandfathered in because it started before the legislation took effect.

I've always dreamed about tunneling the busses underneath the square so that it could be one contiguous space. However, this would create other issues that make my idea sound stupid.

^or, strikingly out of place.