Whipjacka

.

I honestly thought it was the black keys until the credit at the end.

Part of it was the fact that automotive industry executives ran DOT.

The government absolutely endorsed sprawl. I suggest reading about the department of transportation during the wilson and eisenhower administrations. Look at the players involved.

so, we can all add Mark Naymik to our hit list

Trying to get your Stanley Kubrick on?

guess I'll post this here. Can we try to set some guidelines for The type of links we post? I think that, whenever possible, people should avoid posting links to mobile sites.

anyone else go to the game tonight? It was very emotional. proud of the big guy

Their one-story proposal wasn't real, so why would we believe that this is real? They show a bunch or pictures about what the potential of the site is, but none of them are actual plans. The largest parking-lot operator in the country isn't trying to develop their parking lot.

I guess this is what universal acclaim on UO looks like

I'm not upset, I'm just commenting that it felt hastily done.

http://thisiscle.com/

I didn't get the impression, from his answer, that MLS wants or would even consider Cleveland.

^^ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/suzy-strutner/

It reads like somebody who has never spent any time in Ohio did a google search and put together a list in an hour.

woah

This is Cleveland: Please, eat a cheeseburger in our half-empty restaurant.

I wonder if three competing cities will split the ohio votes.

Its obvious that MTS didn't literally mean to 'allow'. He used it as a means to challenge and refute ERocc's credibility. Credibility that ERocc claims to have

They use no statistical evidence. All they did was have somebody ride the train (we don't even know how many times).

Does anybody know anything about surveys? What is an acceptable number of people polled for it to be respectable? This says 1,370 registered voters were surveyed. Is that enough people to draw conclusions, or is it low? Not that I don't believe it; i'm just curious.

Actually, correct me if I am wrong, but that is one thing, under city ordinances for that area, that they cannot do (tear it down for parking). I wonder what the stanley block will become.

Actually, i think they are ony pretending to sell this stupidity by facetiously comparing it to Times Square whose only similarities to this project is that both contain electronic advertising. In reality, they are going to knock down the building and build a temporary parking lot there that will exist for the next thirty years.

I guess the thought would be that residential developers wouldn't have to pay for foundation work.

That's basically the entire project. More advertising space which they sold to the city as a way to improve "fan experience" Not liking the project doesn't mean you have to pretend that there are no real improvements. Scoreboard, PA, escalators, better internet, and revamped food stands are all involved in the upgrade. Those do enhance fan experience