-
Cleveland: Downtown: Sherwin-Williams Headquarters
-
Cleveland: Cleveland-Cliffs
Article says US Steel's headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh. Not clear from the article is whether that would be a subsidiary of a Cleveland-based Cliffs or if Cliffs would move.
-
Cleveland: Ohio City: Development and News
-
Cleveland: Random Development and News
Even if they move to Brook Park?
-
The Official *I Love Cleveland* Thread
The Washington Post ranked the top 20 art museums in the U.S. and puts the Cleveland Museum of Art at 7: https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/art/2024/10/24/20-best-art-museums-in-america/
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Huntington Bank Field
So lets say the Browns build in Brook Park and the county is able to make little to no direct financial contribution to construction costs. I think they should still be pro-active about transportation infrastructure, namely connections to the Red Line. A nice, high capacity, covered walkway over Rt. 237 to the airport and its RTA station is a legitimate governmental expense that would make this site much more connected to transit. Maybe there could be improvements at Brookpark Station as well. I'm not the first person to say these things, but what I've seen from the Browns' plans so far doesn't provide for any such connection, so the county should be pro-active about it.
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Tower City / Riverview Development
This Cavs facility looks great, it'll breath life into an underutilized part of the river. I have a question/comment about how it relates to the possibility of extending the CVSR to downtown. Ken's article references the "former CSX railroad right of way which was abandoned for the riverfront development." My understanding is that refers to the ROW that CVSR would need to get to Tower City, which is between the basketball facility site and Cleveland Thermal. The plans show that ROW north of Eagle Ave being turned into a new roadway, although from what I can tell it's not specifically in the site of facility that just got approval. All that is to say, the dream of connecting CVSR directly to Tower City is officially dead, right?
-
New Albany: Ohio One (Intel Semiconductor Facility)
ryanfrazier replied to cbussoccer's post in a topic in Central & Southeast Ohio Projects & ConstructionQualcomm is trying to buy Intel: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/20/technology/qualcomm-intel-talks-sale.html
-
Cleveland: University Circle: Circle Square
Great addition to the neighborhood. I do think its a bit weird though that the retail will be on west side of the building fronting Stokes and the east side on MLK is basically a parking garage entrance. I would think the east side facing Wade Lagoon and the trees would be more attractive.
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Huntington Bank Field
He didn't say anything like this, where are you getting it from? He said that the form of the development in Brook Park is a choice we get to make. He also said there's a higher and better urban use for all the parking downtown necessitated by the stadium.
-
Cleveland: Local Media News & Discussion
Steven Litt is retiring from the PD. He did a lot of great work.
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Tower City / Riverview Development
In my perfect world, construction of new buildings and/or green space would be above CVSR tracks. But I also don't think tracks would have to go all the way to the B&O depot to be a big improvement. Cleveland Thermal would be better than the site in the plan. Or a small station could be built where the Gateway walkway juts out by the intersection of Huron and Ontario. Basically, I'm not picky, but anything closer than the proposed site would be an improvement.
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Tower City / Riverview Development
This old rail station would be the perfect terminus for CVSR, but its at the complete opposite end of the Riverview site. This plan is an explicit rejection of using this building. If the plan is built out as proposed, the right of way to this old station will be completely blocked off. And if you're proposing a structure like this be built at the southeast site in the plan, 1) it doesn't have the history; 2) it doesn't have the connectivity.
-
Cleveland: Downtown: Tower City / Riverview Development
In my opinion the report offers the most meager scraps in terms of connecting the CVSR. This is a huge missed opportunity. It relegates a possible connection to the farthest southeast corner of the project, barely within downtown. This site is vertically removed from the rest of downtown; anyone on foot would have a hike uphill. Its also completely disconnected from the transit hub at Tower City. If these two rail services could connect to each other they would multiply in value and utility. Once this area is built up, the opportunity to connect won't arise for a hundred years.
-
Cleveland Guardians Discussion
Good analysis of the Guardians' hitting prowess from the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2024/07/01/cleveland-guardians-offense/