cle_guy90

How do you find the population by census tract. I've been trying to find it on the census gov website but I can't find it no matter what I type into the search.

Redirected from the Ohio Population thread and borrowing from @jon81oh compilation of Cuyahoga. Location of these tracts. Top 10 Fastest Growing Tracts 2010-2019 - Cuyahoga 1. 1147: 137.08% - Cleveland - Kinsman 2. 107701: 70.83% - Cleveland - Downtown 3. 187105: 40.35% - University Heights 4. 1043: 31.88% - Cleveland - Tremont 5. 101101: 25.80% - Cleveland - Edgewater 6. 109801: 23.25% - Cleveland - Central 7. 1241: 23.00% - Cleveland - Jefferson 8. 1031: 22.77% - Cleveland - Detroit Shoreway 9. 1055: 22.11% - Cleveland - Brooklyn Centre 10. 1516: 20.34% - East Cleveland Top 10 Fastest Shrinking Tracts 2010-2019 - Cuyahoga 1. 114501: -48.28% - Cleveland - Kinsman 2. 109301: -43.35% - Cleveland - Central 3. 1162: -38.66% - Cleveland - Glenville 4. 1196: -37.89% - Cleveland - Buckeye Woodhill (I think) 5. 1410: -34.52% - Cleveland Heights 6. 1184: -32.11% - Cleveland - Glenville 7. 113101: -31.38% - Cleveland - Central/Fairfax 8. 1939: -29.65% - Highland Hills (big surprise here for me) 9. 1135: -29.07% - Cleveland - Fairfax 10. 110801: -27.82% - Cleveland - Broadway/Slavic Village So this doesn't make much sense to me. Could any of the growth or redistribution of growth be government housing related? Needless to say it is in the city and urban where we are seeing the most growth and decline. Interesting that not one West Side neighborhood was on the fastest decline.

Just tried it and figured out that it is censusreporter.org. Thanks for the site!

I may be in the minority on this but I want our stadium to stay on the lakefront because I think it’s our best chance of eventually getting the front developed. Especially if the stadium becomes one that can be used year round.

Great news. It was unanimously approved by all 38 of the voting members present. This could be a huge step in preventing sprawl! https://www.cleveland.com/news/2020/12/noaca-board-approves-new-policy-on-interchanges-that-could-limit-sprawl-encourage-smart-growth.html

With so many low income earners in the past in Cleveland you can’t just base it off the median income to know if the high income are replacing low income. For instance let’s say Cleveland’s median income is 30k. I know it’s somewhere are kind there but not sure where. You could have lots of people making between 30-40k be replaced by people making over a 100k and you would never know. The best way of knowing is by looking at Cleveland’s income which has already been shown that it is definitely increasing at a clip beyond 3% adjusted for inflation and that is not just because of the new income tax. All you have to do is look at all the new apartment developments and new housing in Cleveland to know that the low income is being replace by higher income.

So let's end all the NYC talk. I'm interested in this comment. What makes them say that the Cleveland will start gaining in population by 2023/24? Is it that they think that there will be enough neighborhoods that have stabilized?

Yeah you would hope though if that was the case metro Akron would be increasing. It isn't which means the region is losing a lot of population. The most discouraging thing to e is the rapid population loss in Cleveland MSA and Cuyahoga county from 2014-2010. If you look at the MSA from 2011 to 2014 it had actually stabilized and was slightly starting to grow. Hopefully the April census will be encouraging but I am not banking on it.

Looked at the Census Estimates and it's bad news for not just Cleveland, but also for Cuyahoga County, and the MSA. I keep hoping we are turning the corner but the numbers just don't suggest this.

https://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/2020/12/tax-incentives-for-overhaul-of-former-huntington-building-clear-cleveland-city-council-panel.html With this and the TMUD could this project actually happen? I have to say I thought there was no chance a few months ago.

I almost said CDC but then I thought no I’m thinking of COVID haha.

DO you have insight as to why it didn't land here?

I think none of them had a chance of being in Cleveland and were just expanding where they already were at or a close neighborhood nearby. The only thing that I don’t get is why Aethrsys didn’t expand in Cleveland. 400 new jobs and nearly 100k a job is something you want to land especially since their headquarters are in Cleveland already. There may be a reason that we don’t know though.

I haven’t heard anything as concrete but someone I close with who is a career house flipper among other things believes that Old Brooklyn is next and that they have a great Neighborhood Development Board (or whatever you call it, the term is alluding me).

Great news for north east Ohio with the tax credits - 3000 nearly new jobs. Only sad part is none of the jobs are for Cleveland and only a little more than 200 in Cuyahoga. Also, does anyone know why Athersys is expanding in Stow instead of Cleveland? Lordstown Motors - Lordstown - 1570 full time jobs - 91 million payroll Athersys - Stowe - 400 jobs - 34.8 mil Tractor Supply - Navarre - 375 - 14 mil Stakes - Eastlake - 400 - 12.5 mil Issquared - Solon - 109 - 8.8 mil Digital Room - Solon - 60 - 2.8 mil Luminance Brands - Cuyahoga Falls - 42 - 2.7 mil Airgas USA - Independence - 42 - 1.8 mil

Since I don't have a membership can you give some of the reasons why? I would think that having people work from where ever in the country would cause them to have to travel more if anything since they wouldn't be near the headquarters.

Favorite quote from the article: "The healthier that Cleveland is, the healthier all of us in suburbs are," said JoAnn Glick, a registered nurse who worked in inner-city hospitals in Philadelphia and Cleveland. "It's a regional thing. We're kidding ourselves if we don't realize that we're all in this together. So the underserved deserve to have that playing field leveled out and have the opportunities that a lot of other people have much more easily." If only all people in the region thought that way. To clarify. I'm not trying to tie politics or socialized medicine into this thread but rather point out that our region will not thrive if we have a city that is full of underserved, under resourced people. How Cleveland goes, so goes the region.

Analyzing it further somethings seems off about the numbers. For instance, if you take the top ten feeder and takers states for Hamilton County you get a net loss of 1728. But we know during that period there was a net gain of 1282. This means the other 32 states/DC/PR would have had to produce a gain of 3010 which would be an average of 94 people but that can't be the case otherwise they'd be in the top ten of Hamilton county. @jon81oh any idea what is going on? If the second set of numbers is not annual then that could explain the number difference (would change it to 25 people per year per state).

I wouldn't mind compiling it but can't seem to find the data I need on the Census site. If someone wants to send me a link that contains that data I would do the breakdowns.

I feel like I had heard that said before too but it never added up based on occupancy rates. Now we have enough apartments that we could get there right now but the pandemic has slowed down the actual growth down. I do think we will get there by the end of 2021.

It very well may have. This is essentially the migration of all living. So this could be an 80 year old who migrated to Columbus fifty years ago. And a person who was born in Cleveland moved to New York then retired in Florida would still count as a person born in Ohio living in Florida.

Inspired by Rich Exner of Cleveland.com's analysis of recent census data. When looking at where people born in a Ohio currently live versus where people who live in Ohio were born, this is what we get in terms of net gain/loss in population. Losses Net Loss of 0-10k in Population Maine, Mississippi, Hawaii, Arkansas, Delaware, Connecticut, Alaska, Vermont, Wyoming, Oklahoma, Utah, New Hampshire, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Wisconsin, New Mexico Net Loss of 10-25k in Population Massachusetts, Missouri, Minnestoa, Michigan Net Loss of 25-50k in Population Maryland, Oregon, Nevada, Washington, Kentucky Net Loss of 50-100k in Population Indiana, Virginia, Tennessee, Colorado, South Carolina Net Loss of 100-155k in Population Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina, Texas, California Net Loss of 450+k in Population Florida Gains Net Gain of 0-10k in Population Nebraska, Iowa, Louisiana, North Dakota, DC, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Alabama Net Gain of 10-25k in Population Illinois Net Gain of 25-50k in Population New Jersey Net Gain of 50-100k in Population New York, Pennsylvania Net Gain of 100+ West Virginia

The winky face makes me thinks there is something important to this but I honestly don’t know what this means. Any insight?

Cleveland Athletic Club/Athlon should be moved from completed new construction to completed renovation. Great map!!

I agree but Cleveland for some reason tends to be so much more out of wack than the many (if not all) of the other major metros. There have been several instances I can point to. Also, this time definitely doesn’t have to do with seasonal adjustment because 120k in employment and 90k in labor force just shows that the numbers are just out of wack. You might be wise though in just not paying attention to the numbers but I love data and love economic growth and this is really the only widespread way to track it.