Jump to content

breakground

Dirt Lot 0'
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. In fact, the soccer stadium itself was justified as ‘for the children’ by Sittenfeld when he flipped from ‘no way’ to supporting it. He claimed his conversation with the teacher’s union persuaded him due to the additional tax revenue the schools would get. 🙄
  2. It's the PD that requires an official amendment - approved by the city after public hearings. Agreed that neighbors should ask for a new CBA - if they even want to negotiate at all, or just oppose additional nights of events at the stadium.
  3. But has FCC requested and obtained the changes to their PD that will be required? There are limits on the number of events they can host each year.
  4. Residents, not surprisingly, prefer to park on the street - close to home, easier to manage moving groceries, kids, etc in and out car and into home.
  5. You should check. In court, the 'developer' admitted they did not have financing. Extremely doubtful - this is not an experienced crew.
  6. It's NOT being held up in court. That case has been over for ages. It's been a hole in the ground with NO action for almost two years.
  7. Assumed this was a reference to the boutique hotel proposed by The Pitch management. It's been years and all we got was a hole in the ground.
  8. That boutique hotel has been a hole in the ground for over a year — doesn't seem to be making any progress. Not sure they ever had the financing. Anyone have other news on it?
  9. Agreeing with @tonyt3524— this statement is remarkably similar to what PJ said before he flipped from 99% likely a no vote (so he said), stadiums aren't a good investment for cities (citing research), etc to 'I'm holding this press conference because NOW I am persuaded'.
  10. It might. And too many STRs can certainly drive away residents...and homebuyers.
  11. Landlord tenant law is not the applicable law. Cincinnati considered regulating STRs a few years ago. There was no claim made by anyone that it would not be allowed under Ohio law. In the end, Airbnb successfully supported local lobbying to eliminate Council support. THAT might happen again - but unless the Ohio law has changed in the interim, regulation limiting STRs is possible here.
  12. What is the basis of this statement? NYC recently eliminated STR and sustained the new law over Airbnb litigation.