Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Yellow Brick Pizza & the Angry Baker

DSCF7848.jpg

 

Still vacant...

DSCF7843.jpg

 

DSCF7851.jpg

 

DSCF7854.jpg

 

DSCF7855.jpg

 

DSCF7856.jpg

 

DSCF7858.jpg

 

King Lincoln Infill & Rehab

DSCF7859.jpg

 

DSCF7860.jpg

 

Latta Avenue Condos

DSCF7861.jpg

 

DSCF7863.jpg

 

DSCF7864.jpg

 

DSCF7865.jpg

 

National Road Condos

DSCF7867.jpg

 

DSCF7870.jpg

 

DSCF7873.jpg

 

DSCF7872.jpg

 

DSCF7875.jpg

 

Miller Avenue Vacancy

DSCF7876.jpg

 

More Miller

DSCF7877.jpg

 

Even more Miller

DSCF7878.jpg

 

DSCF7879.jpg

 

DSCF7880.jpg

 

DSCF7881.jpg

 

DSCF7883.jpg

 

Average Infill

DSCF7891.jpg

 

DSCF7886.jpg

 

DSCF7887.jpg

 

Linwood Rehab

DSCF7889.jpg

 

Another Linwood Rehab

DSCF7888.jpg

 

And another Linwood Rehab

DSCF7890.jpg

 

Livingston Streetscaping

DSCF7893.jpg

 

Nationwide Expansion

DSCF7896.jpg

 

 

Great stuff going on!

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

very heartening to see this happening - thx!

I see you also got some of what the city considers the "Near South" (basically just an extension of the Near East south of I-70 and east of Parsons), which has seen considerably less impovements than the area just a straight shot east of Downtown. Aside from the hospital expansion and a couple of small residential pockets (Old Oaks and Ganther's Place) it looks the same as it did years ago, but now with less buildings (the Reeb building is gone). OTE and KL have seen some further improvements, but I lived next to the Parsons area there four years ago and only four new businesses (Yellow Brick Pizza, Voda, Portico, and the Angry Baker) have opened there, while there hasn't been a new business in King-Lincoln since The Book Suite opened in 2009. Columbus, except for the very few stepping forward, must have some of the most timid urban pioneers. I mean, really now, we can expect *maybe* one business in each neighborhood per year? Give the Near East a decade at this rate and at least the few remaining commercial buildings on Oak St will be filled in, while a handful of places will open on E Main. Maybe Mt Vernon Ave will get some attention in the meantime. E Livingston and Whittier will fare much worse, even though that shouldn't be the case.

Nice to see an area with so much potential finally getting some sustained much-needed attention. Great photos as well, ink!

  • 3 months later...

A little more from King Lincoln:

 

2010_0604NoBo0025.jpg

 

DSCF9296.jpg

 

DSCF9298.jpg

 

DSCF9300.jpg

 

DSCF9302.jpg

 

DSCF9305.jpg

 

DSCF9308.jpg

 

DSCF9313.jpg

 

DSCF9315.jpg

 

DSCF9317.jpg

 

DSCF9322.jpg

 

DSCF9325.jpg

 

DSCF9327.jpg

 

DSCF9328.jpg

 

DSCF9336.jpg

 

DSCF9337.jpg

 

DSCF9342.jpg

 

DSCF9346.jpg

 

DSCF9343.jpg

 

DSCF9347.jpg

Im really liking that King-Lincoln stuff.  I remember driving through there and being suprised. 

 

These remind me of Louisville-style houses:

 

DSCF7881.jpg

 

...with the way the dormer is pulled to the front so it is flush with the front facade.  Thats a common trick you see in Louisville foursquares.

 

 

 

 

Heres a question to those who are familiar with both places...

 

...does Columbus seem more 'brick' to y'all than Dayton.  It seems that in Dayton they started out building in brick then switched to mostly wood construction sometime in the 1870s or 1880s (except for the more elaborate bourgouis housing).  In Columbus it seems they continued to build in brick later.  Or is this just my imagination?

No, it's not your imagination.  Columbus is easily more of a brick city than Dayton.  As you said, central Dayton neighborhoods are mostly brick but the majority of the city is wood-frame (almost Great Lakes in that sense).

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Hmm, wonder why.

Every time I ask about this in Cleveland I'm told there's a brick shortage, or something to that effect.  But then I see pictures of new construction in other cities, including Columbus, that uses brick (and even ornamental stone) like it's no problem at all.  Maybe Cleveland and Dayton are home to the world's best vinyl siding salesmen.  Or the world's worst architects.

Heres a question to those who are familiar with both places...

 

...does Columbus seem more 'brick' to y'all than Dayton.  It seems that in Dayton they started out building in brick then switched to mostly wood construction sometime in the 1870s or 1880s (except for the more elaborate bourgouis housing).  In Columbus it seems they continued to build in brick later.  Or is this just my imagination?

I wonder if the proximity to nelsonville and the hocking valley had anything to do with the amount of brick structures in columbus compared to dayton and cleveland. Columbus also had a large influx of german immigrants,as well as cincy, that were skilled bricklayers and emulated the architecture of their home country. I know dayton had german immigrants too so it would probably be interesting to see data about immigration patterns coinciding with architecture. I know that doesn't explain recent brick construction being minimal in cleveland. Who knows?

I'm thinking the Appalachia connection to Nelsonville/Athens played a big part in Columbus' brick architecture.

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

cleveland had a hell of a lot more brick apts if not housing than you would think looking at it today.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.