Jump to content

Featured Replies

I found the first episode boring. I'll probably only be watching for the shots of Cincinnati

didn't it have a like a 0.6 rating or something like that?

This show is the perfect example of the typical insular culture that pervades Cincinnati socialites. In the first few minutes of the show they made almost five Grippos references. Who cares about that stuff outside of the Cincinnati region? No wonder why Gawker hated it. The show basically presents Cincinnati as a place that's got great looks but no depth. A real missed opportunity.

“All truly great thoughts are conceived while walking.”
-Friedrich Nietzsche

This show is the perfect example of the typical insular culture that pervades Cincinnati socialites. In the first few minutes of the show they made almost five Grippos references. Who cares about that stuff outside of the Cincinnati region? No wonder why Gawker hated it. The show basically presents Cincinnati as a place that's got great looks but no depth. A real missed opportunity.

 

So what? I'm sorry, but most cities the size of Cincy exhibit this type of "insular culture", and it isn't ALWAYS a bad thing.

 

If there is anything to blame for the city having "no depth", I wouldn't be blaming the potato chips.  It's got a lot more to do with they kind of show this is, the people in it, and the person who may be watching. 

Besides, I can get Grippo's, Skyline and Burger beer here in Columbus. We've even got Deveroe's now.

This show is the perfect example of the typical insular culture that pervades Cincinnati socialites. In the first few minutes of the show they made almost five Grippos references. Who cares about that stuff outside of the Cincinnati region? No wonder why Gawker hated it. The show basically presents Cincinnati as a place that's got great looks but no depth. A real missed opportunity.

 

So what? I'm sorry, but most cities the size of Cincy exhibit this type of "insular culture", and it isn't ALWAYS a bad thing.

 

If there is anything to blame for the city having "no depth", I wouldn't be blaming the potato chips.  It's got a lot more to do with they kind of show this is, the people in it, and the person who may be watching. 

 

I think the problem this show will face isn't the local references. They're up against  the fact that since their birth in the mid 90's with the Real World, there has been a steady escalation of manufactured conflicts and staged 'real life' plot lines in reality programming. When the viewer is looking for a healthy dose of "oh no you didn't!!", a true reality show about 4 actual people living their actual lives is going to ultimately be a letdown.

It's a four week show made by Cincinnati State and airs after the late night local news on Sunday. It's not Bravo and it's not MTV, but so what? It is produced well and shows off a great urban environment. The city looks good and that's refreshing to see in HD.

 

Gawker hated it because Gawker is for haters. Who cares what Gawker thinks? Anyone?

 

And for those who like to pick apart the lives of people on TV, how would your life look if it was shrunk down into a 20 minute segment of "reality TV"? Kudos to the ladies for doing their thing regardless of the scrutiny. Good job, Cincinnati.

 

FYI: Episode 3 will have a good bit of OTR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.