Posted August 29, 200420 yr We looked at five cities in the region and asked: What can Cincinnati do to join the ranks? By Tony Lang Enquirer staff writer After recent stopovers in Cincinnati by 15,000 veterans, President Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, John Kerry, first lady Laura Bush, Oprah Winfrey and other celebrities, it may seem a "duh" sort of question to ask: How are we doing? more below: www.enquirer.com
August 29, 200420 yr .... a new campaign to abolish the city's property tax Really? What would they replace the revenues with? Or would they?
August 30, 200420 yr That article doesn't make a great deal of sense to me. The only really significant points are that Cincinnati is spending huge sums of money to improve itself and that the prosperity of the suburbs is dependent upon the success of the central city. The idea that as long as things are great in West Chester (for instance), it doesn't matter if downtown Cincinnati and downtown Dayton fail, is patently stupid, but, I suspect, not unknown in many suburbs and now exurbs.
January 26, 200520 yr prosperity of the suburbs is dependent upon the success of the central city. ...this sounds like a truism. Has it ever been proven? And what do they define as "sucess"?
January 26, 200520 yr A lot of the info in the article rings true, but it is the same stuff that has been being said for at least 15 years (as long as I have been following this stuff). To answer Jeff's, question; yes it has been proven. If you read a great book by David Rusk called "Cities Without Suburbs", he shows statistically how regions with strong and growing central cities have stronger and faster growing suburbs, and hence a stronger region. It is a good mix of statistical data and conclusions drawn by the author. He has been to town to speak at least three times over the last 10 years or so. His best points show for example a suburb of say Detroit, which is seemingly kicking ass compared to Detroit proper and other SW Michigan suburbs; however, a similar type suburb in say Portland, is in fact beating the crap out of the Detroit suburb.
January 26, 200520 yr what? i haven't replied sarcastically to this one yet? ---------------------- me
January 26, 200520 yr While I can't remember the research firm, it authored a report in the mid-1990s which showed that metro areas having excessive sprawl (defined as having outward metro development even as the central city declined in population), performed poorly economically compared to metro areas that had less of a sprawl proplem. If I remember correctly, metro areas that kept their sprawl relatively in check had several times greater GDP and individual wealth per resident than regions that couldn't. It ranked various cities, and I recall metro areas like Detroit and Cleveland among the "top" five that performed the worst, while urban areas like Portland and I think Raleigh-Durham performing the best. KJP "In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck
January 26, 200520 yr But it's the right question, and begs other questions such as - Compared to whom? Aaargh...no, it does NOT "beg other questions"...begging the question is a specifically defined logical fallacy that means you are assuming your conclusion in your premise...it does not mean, "that leads to the question", or what Diane Rehm always says, "the question becomes..."
February 23, 200817 yr Unified cities and unified metros have an edge, whether competing for state or federal dollars or in the global marketplace. Cincinnati is playing catch-up in strengthening bonds to fast-growing Northern Kentucky and Southwest Ohio counties. One prediction: By 2010, the Census Bureau will combine Cincinnati and Dayton into a single metro area - CIN-DAY. All of Greater Cincinnati should make the most of that larger market to step up as a competitive "market performer." People in great cities still quarrel, but almost everybody's pulling in the same general direction. They share the same vision and the same "brand." They're competitive, which allows them to snap back faster from a recession or a disaster like 9/11. New Yorkers even compete with wisecracks and comebacks. It's a point of pride to uphold their end in the daily contest. Great post.
Create an account or sign in to comment