Posted January 16, 201312 yr This is the back of a home of a wealthy family (the Bordens) in New England from the 1890s. I read that the house had no toilets/plumbing. In this & another picture I see no detached outhouse - would this little thing on the back of the house be an outhouse? I've never seen an outhouse for a wealthy family. Seems kind of elaborate for a door to the basement. Too small for a shed & there's a small barn there anyway. Or would they have just used pots & tossed it out later?
January 16, 201312 yr Hard to tell. However, I would think a "well to do" family would have servants and the family members would never use an outhouse, unless you had to do a No.2 Also an outhouse usually have 2 (or 3) opening. One inside, where you would enter from a shed and one outside behind so that a person could clean out the "waste". A wealthy family may have a double, where one opening would be adult height and the other child height. Remember people only took a bath once, on Saturday back then, so bathrooms weren't needed. You simply "washed up". A person would use a commode, chamber pots and possibly chamber cabinet. Some wealthy victorian families may have had a "curious" cabinet, which housed a commode and chamber pots, etc. hidden in a cabinet.
January 16, 201312 yr in 1890 having indoor plumbing would have been rare, even for an expensive home or wealthy folk.
Create an account or sign in to comment