Jump to content

Featured Replies

Regarding the word “hovel,” remember, please, that is or was the home of many.  And to some it might have meant a great deal....

  • Replies 1k
  • Views 146.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • After hearing a few Duck Island residents complain about parking, PC member August Fluker said "Come on over to the East Side!"  Councilman Charles Slife said "Parking problems are a good problem

  • My company has an eight month rotation program for new college grads, and Waterford Bluffs has become the go to place for all of them to stay. We have four there right now all reverse commuting to our

Posted Images

I thought he was referring to the Abbey Market...in which case, I agree with KJP[/member]

The place definitely gives a bit of a bad impression but you all just inspired me to do some research on it... it has 39 reviews and 4.3/5 stars on google, people apparently really like the owners. Maybe they just need a bit of a remodel, haha.

The place definitely gives a bit of a bad impression but you all just inspired me to do some research on it... it has 39 reviews and 4.3/5 stars on google, people apparently really like the owners. Maybe they just need a bit of a remodel, haha.

 

I was jumped in the parking lot in HS

  • Author

Regarding the word “hovel,” remember, please, that is or was the home of many.  And to some it might have neant a great deal....

 

No I was referring to the house that looks like a dump. It and Abbey Market are increasingly out of place on Duck Island.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Gentrification shouldn't reduce walkable retail.  Abbey Market is an important part of the neighborhood. 

Gentrification shouldn't reduce walkable retail.  Abbey Market is an important part of the neighborhood.

 

no one suggested that the use needs to change though.

So it's not out of place, it just needs some investment like most of Cleveland's storefronts.

The plan for that block is to be converted to mixed use- 1st floor neighborhood retail, with apts above.

So it's not out of place, it just needs some investment like most of Cleveland's storefronts.

 

It's condition is terrible and out of place.  it needs more than "some" investment.

The building is in rough shape, but you'd be impressed with the craft beer selection inside.  I think Berges is trying to get a deal to include them in a mixed use building on the site. 

The building is in rough shape, but you'd be impressed with the craft beer selection inside.  I think Berges is trying to get a deal to include them in a mixed use building on the site.

 

I've been inside and I agree but the outside looks rough.

Sign me up for "the Villas at Abbey Market"

Sign me up for "the Villas at Abbey Market"

 

SoDa SoPa.  With views of historic Kenny's house.

The city part of town  ;D

sodosopa-south-park-gentrification.png.328d6f92c88b548b8ee9dc128b8979ab.png

  • Author

So it's not out of place, it just needs some investment like most of Cleveland's storefronts.

 

Its appearance is out of place, not its use. If mixed use will replace it, so much the better.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • Author

More densification of Duck Island....

 

http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/bza/agenda/2018/crr04-23-2018.pdf

 

9:30

Calendar No. 18-76: 2221 W. 20 Street Ward 3

Kerry McCormack

12 Notices

Leigh Fox, owner, proposes to build a multi-family residence in a B1 Multi-Family Residential District.

The owner appeals for relief from the strict application of the following sections of the Cleveland

Codified Ordinances:

1. Section 355.04 which states that the maximum gross floor area allowed is 3631.50 square feet

and the proposed gross floor area is 3718 square feet.

2. Section 357.09(b)(2)(A) which states that in Residence Districts other than Limited One Family

Districts, no building shall be erected less than 10’ from main building on an adjoin lot within

such Residence Districts; proposed distance is 7’-2”.

3. Section 357.09(b)(2)© which states that in Multi-Family districts no interior side yard, shall

be less than 8’; proposed side yard is 3’.

4. Section 357.13 which states that an air conditioning unit is not a permitted interior side yard

encroachment. (Filed March 28, 2018)

 

41390533791_b86b685298_b.jpg

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Author

The 2097 Columbus Lofts rise next to the West 25th-Ohio City Red Line rail station, one of many Duck Island-Ohio City developments rising within a few minutes walk of this station, also served by the 24-hour #81 bus and multiple other 24-hour bus routes nearby.

 

32130655_10155822894722862_1164459603535069184_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=8abd99f4a52ecfebb7e654d46b13bce3&oe=5B8D4D79

 

32089528_10155822894782862_1187651245817462784_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=7039a94252b1f12fc76b4e57723bef01&oe=5B987A9B

 

32155006_10155822894872862_8529899801129517056_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=af14e93e7648e1ffd430184140793fd1&oe=5B8BAA71

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

That is the townhouses going up at 2071 Columbus NOT at 2097 Columbus.....but they are both good examples of T.O.D.

 

https://goo.gl/maps/6yUpnFi3AJr

 

 

 

 

but they are both good examples of T.O.D.

 

Because the entire development is single-use residential, it offers nothing to the 99.9% of potential transit-riders who fail to own a townhouse there.  As such it will have minimal effect on ridership.  It contributes nothing to the perceived or actual utility of the transit system as an alternative to driving.  In no way is this development oriented to the transit station that happens to be nearby. 

 

General rule of thumb:  if the street frontage is mostly garage doors or the first floor is mostly garage space, or the entire site is forever off-limits to pedestrians, then you're looking at a Car Oriented Development.  If it's located this close to a major transit station, you might even call it a Transit Thwarting Development due to the very limited number of parcels where TOD is possible.

  • Author

That is the townhouses going up at 2071 Columbus NOT at 2097 Columbus.....but they are both good examples of T.O.D.

 

https://goo.gl/maps/6yUpnFi3AJr

 

 

 

 

 

I don't see anything about townhomes at 2071 Columbus. Do you have a link?

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • Author

That's probably it.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • Author

So many townhouse developments in the area, it's hard to keep track.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I suppose that's a good problem to have  ;)

"We each pay a fabulous price
  for our visions of paradise."
     - ????, ???????

but they are both good examples of T.O.D.

 

Because the entire development is single-use residential, it offers nothing to the 99.9% of potential transit-riders who fail to own a townhouse there.  As such it will have minimal effect on ridership.  It contributes nothing to the perceived or actual utility of the transit system as an alternative to driving.  In no way is this development oriented to the transit station that happens to be nearby. 

 

General rule of thumb:  if the street frontage is mostly garage doors or the first floor is mostly garage space, or the entire site is forever off-limits to pedestrians, then you're looking at a Car Oriented Development.  If it's located this close to a major transit station, you might even call it a Transit Thwarting Development due to the very limited number of parcels where TOD is possible.

 

Two car garage's, no less!. Maybe it will be used for work space/storage, idk.  I suppose what these will do is make the walking experience more enjoyable and safe (feeling) for the others using the transportation system in this area.

  • 1 month later...
  • Author

Anyone know what's going on with Brickhaus' Ohio City development on Lorain Avenue, across from the Red Line station? If you go to the county's property search engine at http://myplace.cuyahogacounty.us and click on the parcels for this development site, you get the message: "Parcel 00401115 (or 00401116) is an invalid parcel number. Please contact the Fiscal Office for any questions concerning this parcel." However, there are only three parcels left for this development site, the ones noted in the prior sentence and a third, 00401082, which is a tiny parcel no larger than the brick structure standing on it, owned by Ray & Chris Holdings, LLC. This was owned by Ray G. Hauck Trustee until February of this year. This is the same Ray Hauck & Son Painting Inc. which has been around since 1895 (even says so on their little building).

 

Questions -- 1. is the "invalid number" info on the county website a temporary message until the properties are fully consolidated by the county? 2. Hauck is a holdout, I assume because the owner Chris Hauck is refusing to sell to Brickhaus or at least for the price Brickhaus is offering, correct?

Brickhaus-OhioCitysite-2017-2.thumb.jpg.166fecdec6fe615e63e12274a9522913.jpg

Brickhaus-OhioCitysite-2017-1.thumb.jpg.f1fc7305ebc2dc0908d3e3c5265977d6.jpg

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Cannot answer your questions KJP.  Just wanted to chime in that when I started a thread entitled "What will be built first and why" back in 2014 or 2015 I embarrassedly (at least now in hindsight) picked this project as my number one (I believe at the time a few other forum posters agreed).  Boy was I wrong...now I am wondering if it will ever go forward.

  • Author

Stuff happens. It's why I don't gamble. ;)

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I asked Ohio City Inc. about it a few months ago and they were hoping that work would start soon. There was a lot of conflict with the developer who wanted a very large and very tall development that everyone else just didn’t feel was right for the location which led to a lot of back and forth. Hopefully they can compromise. Apparently the developer is pretty difficult to work with.

Has there been any community push back against this as with the proposed apartments across the street?

^^^ The invalid parcel number is almost definitely related to the consolidation of parcels, but the online record system takes a long time to get updated. I have seen parcels that have been consolidated for years still showing the old parcel number online. So whether the consolidation has been finalized or not cannot really be determined from the online records.

Getting the numbers right can take some time especially with how valuable this piece of dirt is.  I would expect that you all will hear about this very soon.

  • Author

 

It looks like some genuine work has started on these townhouses.  There is a stone wall/foundation being built at the base of the hill.

 

I see on the county website that the development site's large parcel has been subdivided for each unit.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

These are beautiful. I wish we'd see more rowhomes as opposed to the gimmicke ones peppering Tremont, OC, and DS

  • 3 weeks later...

Stuff happens. It's why I don't gam

Cannot answer your questions KJP.  Just wanted to chime in that when I started a thread entitled "What will be built first and why" back in 2014 or 2015 I embarrassedly (at least now in hindsight) picked this project as my number one (I believe at the time a few other forum posters agreed).  Boy was I wrong...now I am wondering if it will ever go forward.

So do I, unfortunately....

  • 1 month later...

From the Terminal Tower observation deck this past Sunday:

 

Here is a picture of this place from the front and the one next-door who's foundation you can see in your pic. Lorain and West 17th(?), I think

 

edit: Attached picture instead of direct link.

w17th_lorain.thumb.jpg.cb6ac598e34c7e34ba78816f4bce7c08.jpg

A shot of the in-progress Mercury Townhomes on West 17th.

 

http://www.duckislanddevelopment.com/mercury-townhomes/

 

 

And lastly, a couple shots of the townhomes at the northeast corner of Columbus Road and Freeman, across from Forest City Brewery.

 

edit: Attached images instead of direct linking.

columbus_freeman2.thumb.jpg.f56e08137658c367ff63dc5b7849de55.jpg

columbus_freeman1.thumb.jpg.b254ef32c538c883d12af08b41a48589.jpg

w17th_mercury.thumb.jpg.d1fa77d6c016c3994560cbdf1df1be38.jpg

  • Author

The speed at which homes get proposed, approved, financed and built in Duck Island is astounding. Of course, the market rate for housing there is what makes the engine go.

 

I hope things will move as quickly just the down the hill on Scranton Peninsula.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I like these townhomes a lot, both with design and street presence, I'm just curious about how these designs will look in 10+ years and that goes for all of these similarly designed townhomes with both materials and overall design. Right now though I'm in love with the progress in the area.

The speed at which homes get proposed, approved, financed and built in Duck Island is astounding. Of course, the market rate for housing there is what makes the engine go.

 

I hope things will move as quickly just the down the hill on Scranton Peninsula.

 

Hearing the carter road proposal has stalled due to engineering costs for securing the hillside.

Can't see the images, all I get is a do not enter emblem.

Can't see the images, all I get is a do not enter emblem.

 

Okay, apparently direct linking to images in a shared Google Photo album is flaky. I updated the posts with the images attached instead of direct-linked.

The speed at which homes get proposed, approved, financed and built in Duck Island is astounding. Of course, the market rate for housing there is what makes the engine go.

 

I hope things will move as quickly just the down the hill on Scranton Peninsula.

 

Hearing the carter road proposal has stalled due to engineering costs for securing the hillside.

 

Nope, it’s slowly progressing.

Can't see the images, all I get is a do not enter emblem.

 

Okay, apparently direct linking to images in a shared Google Photo album is flaky. I updated the posts with the images attached instead of direct-linked.

 

I'm sure the UO police will let you off with just a warning, just this once.

 

Thanks for posting!

I like these townhomes a lot, both with design and street presence, I'm just curious about how these designs will look in 10+ years and that goes for all of these similarly designed townhomes with both materials and overall design. Right now though I'm in love with the progress in the area.

Contemporary design has been around longer than 10 years already. Just not in Cleveland. Take a look around Columbus.

Also, these homes will always look better than the "home" that is to the left of the new townhomes at the corner of Freeman and Columbus above.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.