Jump to content

Featured Replies

I don’t think it will be demolished anytime soon, unless the County agreed to building on site after demolishing the jail and police station. There is more than enough room on that block (the Justice Center literally takes up a block) for a new tower or even midtown. But with the accounts looking for 15-20 acres downtown, there aren’t too many sites with that much room. I don’t think there would be 15 acres with the jail and police station being torn down. I’m betting this points to The Pit being the chosen location when all is said and done.

 

The County bought what is now The 9 after it sat vacant for 20 years; I think the Justice Center tower at least had a chance of surviving. They could literally tear everything else down though, including the atrium that leaks every time it rains. Anyone who has been over to the police station side of the complex knows that place isn’t in the best shape either.

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Views 176.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Gonna shut down the renovation now, not even worth discussing. A new tower is already in the works at a specified location downtown. All I can say at the moment 

  • Thanks again @Geowizical!     TUESDAY, MARCH 9, 2021 The Justice Center plan that could transform downtown   At the end of this month, on March 25, the Justice Cent

  • Incoming!  

Posted Images

On 2/11/2022 at 9:06 PM, dski44 said:

What would the existing property be worth on the open market...with and without the current structures?

45 Erieview just sold for $21.5M or $43.50/sf.  At that price the 2.3M sf Justice Center would sell for $100M.  That includes the jails though, which probably aren't very marketable, so the real number would probably be much lower.

 

SHW recently spent $49.4M on 7 acres of vacant downtown land, or $7M/acre.  If demolished, the Justice Center's 4 acre site would sell for $28M.

 

These aren't perfect comparisons, but I think they provide a general ballpark.

Cuyahoga-County-Jail-presentation-March2

 

The best place for the new county jail

By Ken Prendergast / February 17, 2022

 

One thing is for certain at this time about the proposed new Cuyahoga County Corrections Center — no one wants it built near them. But there is one location where it could meet the county’s criteria and actually provide some significant community benefits, depending on how it is designed to relate to and connect with its surroundings.

 

MORE

https://neo-trans.blog/2022/02/17/the-best-place-for-the-new-county-jail/

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

^ That place looks pretty nice. I wouldn't mind living there and besides, its free room and board. Yeah.

^ Yes, it does.  A jail doesn't need to look like a jail.  At least from the outside.

My unpopular opinion, get bail reform and reduce the size of county jail. 

It seems very wasteful not having the jail connected to the courts.   Here we are trying to be "green," but we are going to needlessly transport prisoners back and forth?   I know some preliminary preceedings can be done via video, but for most the defendant needs to be present. 

Ken...I think your plan is very well thought out and very desirable.  Would like to see something like that happen.  However, the Debbie Downer in me believes it has so many moving parts that our little county officials, as well as the other agencies they would have to coordinate with, would have a hard time implement something so rationale but creative, at least in a timely fashion to have something built by 2025.  And I am sure there on a number of bone heads on the committee who are not interested in anything more than building a jail for the least amount of money and not transforming a neighborhood.

1 hour ago, Htsguy said:

Ken...I think your plan is very well thought out and very desirable.  Would like to see something like that happen.  However, the Debbie Downer in me believes it has so many moving parts that our little county officials, as well as the other agencies they would have to coordinate with, would have a hard time implement something so rationale but creative, at least in a timely fashion to have something built by 2025.  And I am sure there on a number of bone heads on the committee who are not interested in anything more than building a jail for the least amount of money and not transforming a neighborhood.

 

If nothing is said by people like you, me and other voters plus folks with thoughtful opinions, then the bare minimum is what we'll get. So we all need to speak up with whatever forms of communication are at our disposal. 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

It is one of the handful of sites being considered, correct?

15 minutes ago, LibertyBlvd said:

It is one of the handful of sites being considered, correct?

 

Yes

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • 1 month later...

taco slayers take on the proposed jail site in North Broadawy

 

  • 2 weeks later...

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

^If they do it right that’s fantastic news!

When is the last time I-71 turned a profit?

No one wants the jail built near them. There is going to be opposition everywhere. You can't make everyone happy...

 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

12 minutes ago, KJP said:

No one wants the jail built near them. There is going to be opposition everywhere. You can't make everyone happy...

 

 

No doubt there will be people suddenly paying attention to this issue who will argue that a new jail isn't even needed. 

31 minutes ago, Foraker said:

No doubt there will be people suddenly paying attention to this issue who will argue that a new jail isn't even needed. 

 

Tell them to volunteer at the existing jail and see what their opinion is after that. @YABO713 has done just that. Care to share your observations?

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

26 minutes ago, KJP said:

 

Tell them to volunteer at the existing jail and see what their opinion is after that. @YABO713 has done just that. Care to share your observations?

 

It is the single most disgusting building I've ever been in - and to put things in perspective, I visited a slum in Havana with one toilet per every 40 residents and an open sewer. 

8 minutes ago, YABO713 said:

 

It is the single most disgusting building I've ever been in - and to put things in perspective, I visited a slum in Havana with one toilet per every 40 residents and an open sewer. 

So if you had to leave a Yelp review, this would be 1 star?  😜

7 minutes ago, Cleburger said:

So if you had to leave a Yelp review, this would be 1 star?  😜

 

No rating could register

1 hour ago, KJP said:

 

Tell them to volunteer at the existing jail and see what their opinion is after that. @YABO713 has done just that. Care to share your observations?

 

I don't think @Foraker was asserting that a new jail wasn't necessary, I think he was saying that opponents will make that claim, even if its unfounded.

Seems like if no one wants a new jail located near their homes, this would be the best location. The closest residential properties have freeways, railroad tracks, a river, and numerous industrial properties in between...

15 hours ago, PoshSteve said:

Seems like if no one wants a new jail located near their homes, this would be the best location. The closest residential properties have freeways, railroad tracks, a river, and numerous industrial properties in between...

 

Alcatraz in Lake Erie, anybody?? 

13 minutes ago, YABO713 said:

 

Alcatraz in Lake Erie, anybody?? 

With a windmill farm on top.  The NIMBY bird protectors in Bratenhal will have a stroke.  

18 hours ago, PoshSteve said:

Seems like if no one wants a new jail located near their homes, this would be the best location. The closest residential properties have freeways, railroad tracks, a river, and numerous industrial properties in between...

Why are they upset? Isn't  there already a correctional facility in that area next to the post office?

 

Edited by LibertyBlvd

On the plus side, at least someone will start using the Tri-C Campus District (E. 34th) stop.

On 4/5/2022 at 9:16 PM, PoshSteve said:

Seems like if no one wants a new jail located near their homes, this would be the best location. The closest residential properties have freeways, railroad tracks, a river, and numerous industrial properties in between...

Hey now, this is going to have a drastic impact on a primo CLE photo site lol it'll be tough to be obscure up there w a jail. 

 

I vote for wind farm Alcatraz (with waterfront line access). 

17 hours ago, LibertyBlvd said:

Why are they upset? Isn't  there already a correctional facility in that area next to the post office?

 

Yes it's the women's pre-release facility.    I see no reason why another jail couldn't be located here.  

If they care so much; interested neighbors or the Slavic Village CDC in partnership with City of Cleveland Urban Forestry might do more to support planting some trees on the Eastern flank of I-77.  

That strip of uncared-for income properties, disinvested small business infrastructure, and junk car storage along E49th is one of the greyest, bleakest, filthiest, worst eyesores in all of NEO.

 

🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳🌳  living screen of trees, (or heck even one of those awful concrete sound barriers) along E 49th Street would go a long way toward dissuading each passing commuter from thinking of Slavic Village as a hole, rather than as a cool community worth visiting.

Edited by ExPatClevGuy

  • 2 weeks later...

Cuyahoga Councilman proposing dumping jail oversight committee amid differing opinions

CLEVELAND, Ohio – Just as the committee overseeing three years of planning for Cuyahoga County’s new jail is preparing to vote on a preferred location, one of the members is asking to reverse course while another has proposed scrapping the ad hoc group altogether.

https://www.cleveland.com/news/2022/04/cuyahoga-councilman-proposing-dumping-jail-oversight-committee-amid-differing-opinions.html

9 minutes ago, GISguy said:

Cuyahoga Councilman proposing dumping jail oversight committee amid differing opinions

CLEVELAND, Ohio – Just as the committee overseeing three years of planning for Cuyahoga County’s new jail is preparing to vote on a preferred location, one of the members is asking to reverse course while another has proposed scrapping the ad hoc group altogether.

https://www.cleveland.com/news/2022/04/cuyahoga-councilman-proposing-dumping-jail-oversight-committee-amid-differing-opinions.html

Reasons why this is bad:

1. This process has already gone on much longer than necessary.

2. The existing facility is unsafe for inmates.

3. The existing jail is a poor use of downtown land.  (A downtown courthouse is a different story).

That transport rd site is a no brainer. Frees up the existing site for more appropriate uses, still keeps the facility in a centralised area close to DT, activates an empty site, situated near a rail line from DT, stop the screwing around please and get it done. Love, Snakebite.

^ Agreed.  There is no better site.  Just do it!

5 hours ago, ryanfrazier said:

Reasons why this is bad:

1. This process has already gone on much longer than necessary.

2. The existing facility is unsafe for inmates.

3. The existing jail is a poor use of downtown land.  (A downtown courthouse is a different story).

I wonder if it's plausible to build a new courthouse on the garage behind the old courthouse across the street from the justice center?

11 minutes ago, KFM44107 said:

I wonder if it's plausible to build a new courthouse on the garage behind the old courthouse across the street from the justice center?

I’m pulling for another tower behind Tower City to go with the Fed courthouse and a new Rocket Mortgage tower, and throw in a residential tower or two on the river.

2 hours ago, KFM44107 said:

I wonder if it's plausible to build a new courthouse on the garage behind the old courthouse across the street from the justice center?

 

The Huntington Park Garage is an old garage (45 years) and was renovated for more than $20 million 5-7 years ago. To my knowledge it was not designed to support anything more than its own weight. It was built during (and for) the Justice Center project. Perhaps it's just guilt by association, but I don't trust the structural capabilities of anything associated with the Justice Center.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

16 hours ago, KJP said:

 

The Huntington Park Garage is an old garage (45 years) and was renovated for more than $20 million 5-7 years ago. To my knowledge it was not designed to support anything more than its own weight. It was building during (and for) the Justice Center project. Perhaps it's just guilt by association, but I don't trust the structural capabilities of anything associated with the Justice Center.

Ya. I don't disagree with that sentiment at all. Having been assigned to the justice center before I do think that building is an absolute structural mess. I mean most of the water fountains don't even work. 

Edited by KFM44107

5 hours ago, marty15 said:

I’m pulling for another tower behind Tower City to go with the Fed courthouse and a new Rocket Mortgage tower, and throw in a residential tower or two on the river.

You mean something like what @Geowizical pictured- 

Also - Could a new Justice Center be just to the left or northwest of the Stokes Courthouse? I think it’s a parking lot now. 

 

9B438661-BDBF-48A4-AAC4-9B7EF37A56EF.jpeg

 

Hearing is live

18 hours ago, LibertyBlvd said:

^ Agreed.  There is no better site.  Just do it!

While the site may be an ideal location, it is an environmental nightmare that I'm sure the owner would love to pass on to a sucker buyer...if that is the County, watch the site preparation costs skyrocket once they get into that ground.  The historical contamination/pollutants continuously find their way into the Kingsbury Run storm culvert and make their way into the Cuyahoga River.  Ohio EPA is aware and has been actively looking at this site recently.  It will be a very expensive fix.

^ Wouldn't the current property owner be responsible for remediation prior to sale?

54 minutes ago, scb0525 said:

While the site may be an ideal location, it is an environmental nightmare that I'm sure the owner would love to pass on to a sucker buyer...if that is the County, watch the site preparation costs skyrocket once they get into that ground.  The historical contamination/pollutants continuously find their way into the Kingsbury Run storm culvert and make their way into the Cuyahoga River.  Ohio EPA is aware and has been actively looking at this site recently.  It will be a very expensive fix.

 

Not according to county's environmental consultant. If you watch the video, the analysis from multiple onsite wells show the amount of pollutants are the same or less than what was present at Flats East Bank and at Battery Park before those sites were cleaned or engineered to protect those sites' end users.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Just now, KJP said:

 

Not according to county's environmental consultant. If you watch the video, the analysis from multiple onsite wells show the amount of pollutants are the same or less than what was present at Flats East Bank and at Battery Park before those sites were cleaned or engineered to protect those sites' end users.

Well, I personally have been onsite in the last year, collected samples myself, and have seen the lab analysis.  It's my field of expertise and I would disagree.  It wouldn't be the first time costs escalated because of "differing site conditions" from the due diligence.  Watch the change orders or use of contingency money after they break ground...

 

And it won't be to protect the site's end-users, it will be to protect the Cuyahoga River from the continuous toxic soup that leaches off that site.

19 minutes ago, scb0525 said:

Well, I personally have been onsite in the last year, collected samples myself, and have seen the lab analysis.  It's my field of expertise and I would disagree.  It wouldn't be the first time costs escalated because of "differing site conditions" from the due diligence.  Watch the change orders or use of contingency money after they break ground...

 

And it won't be to protect the site's end-users, it will be to protect the Cuyahoga River from the continuous toxic soup that leaches off that site.

It sounds like it needs to be cleaned up either way. Isn’t this a good opportunity to do so?

When is the last time I-71 turned a profit?

34 minutes ago, Boomerang_Brian said:

It sounds like it needs to be cleaned up either way. Isn’t this a good opportunity to do so?

 

I hope that the amount offered by the county reflects the amount that will go into cleaning up the site/true value of the site. 

I hate to say it, but when industry destroys a piece of land and walks away, it is probably in the best interests of the community to have their government take on the project of rehabilitating that land.  Afterall, businesses can always choose to go elsewhere, but Cuyahoga County can't chose to not have that parcel as part of their charge. 

1 hour ago, X said:

I hate to say it, but when industry destroys a piece of land and walks away, it is probably in the best interests of the community to have their government take on the project of rehabilitating that land.  Afterall, businesses can always choose to go elsewhere, but Cuyahoga County can't chose to not have that parcel as part of their charge. 

Exactly.  Environmental cleanup was one of the primary reasons I supported the "Opportunity" Corridor project.

On 2/18/2022 at 11:58 AM, Cleburger said:

It seems very wasteful not having the jail connected to the courts.   Here we are trying to be "green," but we are going to needlessly transport prisoners back and forth?   I know some preliminary preceedings can be done via video, but for most the defendant needs to be present. 

 

I certainly get what you're saying, but hopefully this becomes much less of an issue in the long run.  No one knows when the EV revolution will fully come upon us, but if (when?) it does, transporting defendants from jail to Court and back should be pretty low hanging fruit for electric vehicles and/or smart cars.  In fact, this is the kind of task that EV's/AV's are made for--short distances (no range anxiety) at set times of day (9-5 M-F) across a large fleet that will have plenty of time to recharge during off-hours.  I'm not saying I expect the county Sheriff's office to go "all electric" by, say, 2025 or so.  That will be pretty expensive, but I think it will happen eventually.  And the county will have purchasing power as a sizeable public entity.  And maybe there will be federal/state subsidies to encourage transition.  The jail will hopefully have a useful life of 40-50 years or so, so there will be plenty of time to figure out green transportation options as we go forward.

 

Now, I'm far from an expert when it comes to this subject, so I could well be missing something.  Maybe the security issues transporting dozens or even hundreds of jailees across town make EV's forever impractical.  I'd be happy to stand corrected if there's a huge hole in my logic above.

Edited by Down_with_Ctown

Speaking of electric, put the courthouse behind Tower City and retro fit a few old Red Line cars into jail cars. Direct link on the Red Line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.