Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, jebleprls22 said:

Still not a fan of that hue of orange... 

Pretty standard terra cotta, no?

 

  • Replies 847
  • Views 102.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

23 minutes ago, Mogilny89 said:

Pretty standard terra cotta, no?

 

Yes but it clashes with the pastels of the convention center and also isn't really a match to the tone of brick at Hilton 1.0 across the street. I don't know why that was the color they chose, it just doesn't seem to reference or intentionally coordinate with anything around it. And considering the two hideous orange buildings that graced the Short North you think they would have shied away from it but apparently someone likes it

5 minutes ago, jebleprls22 said:

Yes but it clashes with the pastels of the convention center

 

The pastels of the convention center are the issue, not the Hilton Tower. I think it looks just fine. A complete overhaul of the convention center façade would be nice though. 

Still mad all these years later they didn't go with the Convention Center design that emulated the look of the Union Station "mall". There were 3 designs: what we got, a more conservative one and the one that looked like Union Station's shopping facade. The two that lost are still not on the internet as far as I can tell. But apparently the OSU library has them in their archives. I wanted the Union Station one to win even as a kid.

 

 

I agree with jebleprls22 in that the Terra cotta is blah, juxtaposed to the convention center or not. If it was being built in Franklinton, I'd have a similar opinion. A number of colors would have worked better. Didn't even have to pay homage to the convention center itself. These tiles just don't look great as an end product. Other examples where they don't look that great include the White Castle building or the apartments at 3rd and high. 

53 minutes ago, GCrites80s said:

Still mad all these years later they didn't go with the Convention Center design that emulated the look of the Union Station "mall". There were 3 designs: what we got, a more conservative one and the one that looked like Union Station's shopping facade. The two that lost are still not on the internet as far as I can tell. But apparently the OSU library has them in their archives. I wanted the Union Station one to win even as a kid.


Im going to need to see this Union Station version of the convention center. 

It would have been cool to have a glass elevator on the east side. 

13 hours ago, GCrites80s said:

Still mad all these years later they didn't go with the Convention Center design that emulated the look of the Union Station "mall". There were 3 designs: what we got, a more conservative one and the one that looked like Union Station's shopping facade. The two that lost are still not on the internet as far as I can tell. But apparently the OSU library has them in their archives. I wanted the Union Station one to win even as a kid.

 

Are these them?

 

Design 1 (Holt Hinshaw Pfau Jones) : https://digital-collections.columbuslibrary.org/digital/collection/p16802coll28/id/161634/rec/4

Design 2 (Michael Graves) : https://digital-collections.columbuslibrary.org/digital/collection/p16802coll28/id/161369/rec/3

Hmm, no I don't remember either of those. I'm sure I would have remembered that second one... my god. Does NOT fall into the category of "conservative"! First one is pretty light on the visual details. The other one I remember (the "conservative" one) was more like the current Washington D.C. Convention Center.

 

Of course it's been over 30 years since I've seen the other two I remember. They were in the Dispatch and maybe Columbus Monthly.

Man that second one would have been a lot more expensive to "cancel" than a couple of statues

There was an interesting zoom on the construction cam this afternoon:

 

image.png.cae25f2211aa16595ffe1f9244256bb9.png

Can someone explain to me how they are building this tower? I watch it daily from the Nationwide tower and cannot make sense of it. They are somehow able to assemble the structure for an entire floor in like 2.5 days. There does not appear to be any steel involved. Is it just poured concrete? As you can see from this picture above, each of the additional floors that they build almost look like they are assembling a stage at an outdoor music festival.

11 hours ago, Mogilny89 said:

Can someone explain to me how they are building this tower? I watch it daily from the Nationwide tower and cannot make sense of it. They are somehow able to assemble the structure for an entire floor in like 2.5 days. There does not appear to be any steel involved. Is it just poured concrete? As you can see from this picture above, each of the additional floors that they build almost look like they are assembling a stage at an outdoor music festival.

The platform you see is formwork for the next floor. Once that is assembled, steel cables are arranged per the structural design and concrete is poured and finished. After a day or so vertical forms are placed for the columns that support the next floor. Once the concrete hardens enough the cables are tensioned. For this tower is seems each floor is poured in two stages which allows the crews to keep working - while concrete cures on one half they are setting up the other half for the next pour.

 

https://www.concretenetwork.com/post-tension/basics.html

From the Hyatt:

PXL_20211031_133411456.thumb.jpg.53a93fdf27de73a691dc18fbc54e4380.jpg

 

PXL_20211031_133624209.thumb.jpg.da8c878213a87f688b94cec16640a11c.jpg

 

From the I-670 west High St/Convention Center offramp:

1558106851_CLB_10-31-21(3).thumb.jpg.e44ed3606ac795c840c136b7c883653e.jpg

28 minutes ago, NorthShore647 said:

From the Hyatt:

PXL_20211031_133411456.thumb.jpg.53a93fdf27de73a691dc18fbc54e4380.jpg

 

PXL_20211031_133624209.thumb.jpg.da8c878213a87f688b94cec16640a11c.jpg

 

From the I-670 west High St/Convention Center offramp:

1558106851_CLB_10-31-21(3).thumb.jpg.e44ed3606ac795c840c136b7c883653e.jpg

I like how it's looking from both 3rd and 4th street too!

6 minutes ago, Luvcbus said:

I like how it's looking from both 3rd and 4th street too!

 

That view will be even better with Market Tower rising behind it!

Anyone have a general idea of when this thing will top out? Have to imagine it's getting close!

13 minutes ago, TIm said:

Anyone have a general idea of when this thing will top out? Have to imagine it's getting close!

 

Rough count, there are 3 floors left to go. I imagine we will see the final pour happening in ~2 weeks. 

 

18 hours ago, TIm said:

Anyone have a general idea of when this thing will top out? Have to imagine it's getting close!


Current anticipated top-out date is right around Christmas.

I sure hope they light it up well to add to the visual appeal. It is very prominent from all directions.

35 minutes ago, NightNectar said:

I sure hope they light it up well to add to the visual appeal. It is very prominent from all directions.

Columbus actually does a decent job of lighting buildings up at night. I was just in Denver and the skyline was so dark at night it was kinda odd.

I saw this on Flickr this morning. It's a nice view of the construction progress, looking south from the High Street cap. 

 

Construction in the Short North

 

View from 5th Ave. and High this morning (a little fuzzy with my old iPhone)

 

 

0C30E239-11E5-4D08-8F39-B6332A23C4BD.jpeg

1 hour ago, Pablo said:

View from 5th Ave. and High this morning (a little fuzzy with my old iPhone)

 

 

0C30E239-11E5-4D08-8F39-B6332A23C4BD.jpeg

I noticed just last night, when it's all lit up, you can see it when you're heading down High before you even get to Lane Ave now!

From this past Saturday:

 

IMG_1247.thumb.jpeg.a71fbeb9c60b943f98729ed55ca58090.jpeg

Do you guys think the construction on this is going fast or slow?

33 minutes ago, 614love said:

Do you guys think the construction on this is going fast or slow?

 

Definitely not slow. It only took six months to go from this...

KU1RO5Y.png

 

to this...

P7EWsqL.png

Is it just me or is the cladding material not a consistent color? Seems really blotchy, maybe just the lighting in those particular pictures, but doesn't look great. 

1 hour ago, 17thState said:

Is it just me or is the cladding material not a consistent color? Seems really blotchy, maybe just the lighting in those particular pictures, but doesn't look great. 

It should get a proper wash down as work continues. That should help.

15 hours ago, 17thState said:

Is it just me or is the cladding material not a consistent color? Seems really blotchy, maybe just the lighting in those particular pictures, but doesn't look great. 

The precast panels will get an acid wash once they're all in place as part of the completion of that scope, which should help even out the tone.

  • 2 weeks later...

262211416_3102510870017722_4926941785744

from 3rd

 

IMG_20211202_134728_0.thumb.jpg.79db23028c40c8c21adcb838439523f9.jpg

 

 

 

View from the Level 28 Rooftop Bar looking south

IMG_3215.JPG

Growing media being hoisted up for the green roof. 
 

 

E5BCFEE9-4CE6-4F18-B8F5-DF3C97980DDD.jpeg
 

 

94A04208-9F4C-46E4-9818-533E4C25FE10.jpeg

Growing media (roof top soil) being spread on the ballroom roof. You can see piles of soil waiting to be spread. This area will have a green roof. Screen shot from the construction cam. 

 

A7B2AE37-9E8B-4EAB-BE10-31526350BF7C.png

On 12/2/2021 at 5:11 PM, PizzaScissors said:

View from the Level 28 Rooftop Bar looking south

IMG_3215.JPG

So does that mean the tower is now topped out??

8 minutes ago, amped91 said:

So does that mean the tower is now topped out??

Not exactly. You still have the crown. But if he’s right then no more concrete floors. 

2 hours ago, WagChase said:

Not exactly. You still have the crown. But if he’s right then no more concrete floors. 


Based on the renderings, the crown is fairly tall. Looks to be equivalent to about two floors. 

5 hours ago, Pablo said:

Growing media (roof top soil) being spread on the ballroom roof. You can see piles of soil waiting to be spread. This area will have a green roof. Screen shot from the construction cam. 

 

A7B2AE37-9E8B-4EAB-BE10-31526350BF7C.png

I think a pool would look awesome on that spot also. Obviously pools suck in Columbus, but would still be a great view. 

Here's the nearly topped-out Hilton tower from December 4th, taken from Flickr.

 

Northern Downtown Towers, Columbus, OH

 

Columbus, Ohio

 

The roof of the rooftop bar was poured this morning. Note the taller floor to floor height at the top. There are notches in the slab where the outdoor areas are. There might be one more slab for rooftop mechanical items? Won't be long now.

 

image.png.cf13dcd9ab9e43237b6b2650f2501a91.png

The progress this building made in six months is pretty impressive. 

 

June 10th:

h1mNJDM.png

 

December 10th:

dYqKZis.png

ABC 6 sunrise time lapse video with the Hilton on the left. 

 

This was posted on r/Columbus last week. The tower is looking great in the skyline. Also, check out the Peninsula/Franklinton area to the right. 

huk21tcxel381.jpg

 

And here's another higher res shot from the same reddit user from about two weeks ago.

g666563rmu281.jpg

Looking at those last two pics....i hate saying this, but Columbus NEEDS an iconic Skyscraper.  It just does.  I know the whole "build it just to build it" doesn't always fly, but in Columbus case, i truly think it does.  We need a tower that is 2x the height of any current building...something that grabs your attention.  Hopefully something that tall is coming soon!!!

14 minutes ago, OhioFinest said:

Looking at those last two pics....i hate saying this, but Columbus NEEDS an iconic Skyscraper.  It just does.  

 

Ummmm....

 

53538_500x650.jpg

6 minutes ago, OhioFinest said:

Looking at those last two pics....i hate saying this, but Columbus NEEDS an iconic Skyscraper.  It just does.  I know the whole "build it just to build it" doesn't always fly, but in Columbus case, i truly think it does.  We need a tower that is 2x the height of any current building...something that grabs your attention.  Hopefully something that tall is coming soon!!!

 

So we need a 1,200' tall tower, which would be in the top 10 on the list of tallest buildings in this country? Don't hold your breath. 

 

What exactly do we need a 1,000'+ tower for? I mean sure, it might look cool from a distance, but so what? We need developments that improve urban and activate the street level experience. Cleveland has a 947' tower that is completely soulless at the street level. It looks cool from Lake Erie, but if you are walking down Rockwell Ave. it's just another office building. Which of the areas below are more enjoyable and useful for residents and tourists alike?

 

WnC8ASe.png

JZIiW5x.png

 

Similarly in Columbus, our tallest buildings do nothing to improve urban living and the street level experience. You get a lot of pedestrian activity during business hours (or at least you did until Covid), but outside of that they suck the soul out of the area. Which of these areas do residents enjoy more and tourists remember the most?

 

fP5rzpr.png

yzCG8IT.png

 

I'm far from opposed to tall towers. I would happily accept more of them, but let's not act like a tall, cool looking tower is going to automatically change the already positive trajectory of our city.

 

32 minutes ago, OhioFinest said:

Looking at those last two pics....i hate saying this, but Columbus NEEDS an iconic Skyscraper.  It just does.  I know the whole "build it just to build it" doesn't always fly, but in Columbus case, i truly think it does.  We need a tower that is 2x the height of any current building...something that grabs your attention.  Hopefully something that tall is coming soon!!!

Idk, I don’t care about getting really tall buildings. I just want great density and walkability. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.