Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 4/22/2021 at 4:25 PM, TH3BUDDHA said:

Encova confirms they are rebuilding the apartments that burned down.  The other "one of two complexes" they mention in the article is the CDDC affordable housing complex mentioned earlier in this thread:

 

Burned Topiary Park apartments to rise again, one of two complexes planned on the park

 

Encova received permission in the fall to demolish the charred remains and rebuild, but after removing the remains, it was mum about its plans. On Thursday, it confirmed that it will rebuild the apartments, though company officials are still discussing the design of the complex, said spokesperson Casei Phillips.

 

More here: https://www.thisweeknews.com/story/business/2021/04/22/topiary-park-apartments-rebuilt-encova-along-affordable-complex/7299287002/

 

There were some interesting visuals from that ThisWeekNews article about two Topiary Park residential projects:

 

First, the rebuilding of Encova's Residences of Topiary Park project that burned last year.  The project on fire last May:

6e94f58a-c5e8-48fe-8483-6ba1be3d68fb-CEB

 

Encova's Residences of Topiary Park project after demo down to the base structure:

ed9934b4-12ec-478b-bd8b-d43652ec4835-CEB

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Views 148.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Got a few pics of the Residences at Topiary Park on my walk today      

  • The Residences at Topiary Park from this morning. I love how this is turning out!  

  • The Standard Building is looking handsome with its facelift, including new windows.      A touch of color on Vera.      And the turret has been installed.   

Posted Images

Second is the CDDC's Topiary Park Crossing, an affordable housing complex at the southwest corner of East Town Street and Washington Avenue.  Here's an aerial of the corner site looking northwest toward the downtown core:

bb2d4955-f2a6-49a1-9e4d-b33f6d504e39-CEB

 

Here's a rendering of the 5-story project looking southwest toward the corner:

e9569ddb-a6aa-4448-98d2-a70583e8a1b1-pas

 

Here's an elevation from CU's previous story about the project:

Topiary-Park-Crossing-2-1536x634.jpg

 

According to the ThisWeekNews article, the CDDC's $20 million Topiary Park Crossing project would include at least 93 affordable apartment units – defined as rent and utilities consuming no more than 30% of a tenant's gross income for those earning 60% to 100% of the area's median income.

 

Moody Nolan designed the five-story building with a 50-space first-floor parking deck.  The CDDC, which bought the 0.7-acre parcel in February for $1.8 million, is seeking a contractor to begin construction in February 2022 and complete the development by July 2023, according to its documents.  This building marks a shift toward affordable housing for the CDDC, which has traditionally worked with private developers to build market-driven projects.

 

Because the property is within a historic district and the downtown district, the CDDC must seek approval of the Columbus Historic Resources Commission before a review by the Downtown Commission.

 

MORE:  https://www.thisweeknews.com/story/business/2021/04/22/topiary-park-apartments-rebuilt-encova-along-affordable-complex/7299287002/

  • 3 weeks later...
On 4/4/2021 at 9:08 PM, TH3BUDDHA said:

Looks like demolition for this is about to begin.  New barriers and signs are up closing the right lane and the sidewalk is closed in front of the building.

Big chunk of this came down this week.  Tried grabbing a picture driving by on my way home.  This was the best I got.

 

20210511_175627.thumb.jpg.898f661014dfc093275e805ab637a07b.jpg

 

20210511_175630.thumb.jpg.96dbe3b611afcae44f4fe73797bc97aa.jpg

36 minutes ago, TH3BUDDHA said:

Big chunk of this came down this week.  Tried grabbing a picture driving by on my way home.  This was the best I got.

 

20210511_175627.thumb.jpg.898f661014dfc093275e805ab637a07b.jpg

 

20210511_175630.thumb.jpg.96dbe3b611afcae44f4fe73797bc97aa.jpg

Oh wow, that was quick! For some reason, I was thinking they were saving these buildings and building over top. 

57 minutes ago, amped91 said:

Oh wow, that was quick! For some reason, I was thinking they were saving these buildings and building over top. 

I think just the corner building that used to be subway is being saved. 

1 hour ago, VintageLife said:

I think just the corner building that used to be subway is being saved. 

No, the corner one with Subway was getting demolished and the other building's facade (the white one) was being saved. Did they demolish the wrong building?!

Screen Shot 2021-05-11 at 9.34.52 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-05-11 at 9.35.03 PM.png

Edited by Ginger Planner

It's already been established that developers can get away with changing their designs after approval without any subsequent oversight in the Downtown area.

Edited by jonoh81

7 minutes ago, Ginger Planner said:

No, the corner one with Subway was getting demolished and the other building's facade (the white one) was being saved. Did they demolish the wrong building?!

Screen Shot 2021-05-11 at 9.34.52 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-05-11 at 9.35.03 PM.png

I didn’t think I was going crazy 😂 I think using the old facade as the corner of the build will look more attractive anyway. Hopefully the rest of the structure will look better than the old renderings...

Very confused by this one. Still think the last renderings are laughably bad. Still pretty sure they could build a hot dog stand here and the commission would worst case make them add a mural to it. 

Did they maybe somehow move the facade to make demolish easier? It seems overly complicated, but maybe they deconstructed the facade so that it wouldn't be harmed during demo or construction of the new building and will reconstruct it later.

Guess I was wrong, yeah no idea what they are doing. This building is bad either way, and the only thing it has going for it is the 13 stories, if they actually follow their approved design. 

9 hours ago, cbussoccer said:

Did they maybe somehow move the facade to make demolish easier? It seems overly complicated, but maybe they deconstructed the facade so that it wouldn't be harmed during demo or construction of the new building and will reconstruct it later.

I'm not sure, but something like this may have been the case.  There have been workers since I posted about it like a month ago, but the building just now came down this week.  Every time I drove by on my way home, there were workers on lifts working on the front of the building.  I didn't know what they were doing.  Not sure why they would have put so much work into something that was just going to be knocked down, but maybe there's just a lot of prep work that I'm not aware of.

Edited by TH3BUDDHA

Were they going to save the actual old facade, or just create a new facade that mimics the old? Pizzuti did that at the old Grandview Mercantile site.

33 minutes ago, TH3BUDDHA said:

I'm not sure, but something like this may have been the case.  There have been workers since I posted about it like a month ago, but the building just now came down this week.  Every time I drove by on my way home, there were workers on lifts working on the front of the building.  I didn't know what they were doing.  Not sure why they would have put so much work into something that was just going to be knocked down, but maybe there's just a lot of prep work that I'm not aware of.

 

Yeah they probably deconstructed the facade and will reconstruct it later when the structure of the new building goes up. The elevator core is right at the front of the building so there was probably no way they could leave it up while building that. I imagine they had to spend a lot of time documenting each of the pieces before carefully removing them. 

 

If I'm not mistaken, this is how the historic facades on the Hampton Inn by the convention center were incorporated in the new building -- documented, carefully deconstructed, and reinstalled -- compared to the new AC Hotel around the corner where they were able to set the new building far enough back to keep the structure of the fronts of the existing buildings.

Demolition progress (5-13-21)

CLB-5-13-21-4.jpg

 

CLB-5-13-21-2.jpg

 

In this photo from Saturday you can see the removed façade of the two story commercial building prior to demolition (5-8-21). 

CLB-5-8-21-29.jpg

 

I don't think they have gone back to the Downtown Commission for final approval yet. So far they've only had conceptual reviews.

  • 2 weeks later...

Library Park, Phase 3 (I think)

library_1.PNG

On 5/24/2021 at 1:00 PM, Imwalle said:

Library Park, Phase 3 (I think)

library_1.PNG

Can someone call LC? They need to send a group over to take notes on how to progress through a build at anything faster than a snails pace... ;)

  • 4 weeks later...

Library Park Phase 3 (6-19-21)

CLB-6-19-21-25.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-23.jpg

 

Digging down for the 13-story 195 E Broad Street mixed use project

CLB-6-19-21-32.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-34.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-31.jpg

 

Vera on Broad / 366 E. Broad Street Apartment Building

CLB-6-19-21-18.jpg

 

Renovation and new apartment building at 530 E. Rich St

CLB-6-19-21-21.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-19.jpg

 

The Edwards Companies PNC building renovation / partial residential conversion 

CLB-6-19-21-28.jpg

 

The lobby along Broad pictured above is to be demolished and replaced with a partially sunken plaza. I took some pictures of the lobby before the barricades went up around the structure recently. 

CLB-5-16-21-6.jpg

 

CLB-5-16-21-9.jpg

 

No work had started on the walkways partial demolition, but there's activity related to the PNC building renovation around it. 

CLB-5-16-21-7.jpg

 

CLB-5-16-21-8.jpg

20180618_Art_Sign_07.jpg?itok=uECdB2ju

 

CCAD celebrates 20 years of the Art Sign in Columbus

 

Having made its mark as a beacon for the city's art scene, the Columbus College of Art & Design is celebrating 20 years since the installation of its 100-foot Art Sign.  The 10-story steel sculpture, installed on June 23, 2001, has become an iconic piece of Columbus' cityscape and a prime landmark for skyline selfies.

 

But above all things, CCAD President Melanie Corn said the 31-ton, 101-foot wide sculpture at Gay Street and Cleveland Avenue speaks to the city's support of the arts.  "The Art Sign is a physical symbol that CCAD, and creative practice more generally, are at the heart of Columbus," she said.  "Art and design drives our economy and turns our city from a place that is not just livable but lovable."

 

To celebrate the Art Sign's historic mark, CCAD is launching a series of programs and social media initiatives throughout the summer ... and has launched a web page - https://www.ccad.edu/artsign - that outlines the history of the Art Sign.

 

MORE:  https://www.dispatch.com/story/entertainment/2021/06/24/ccad-celebrates-20-years-art-sign-part-columbus-skyline/5319282001/

CCAD puts 2 downtown buildings on the market

Bonnier Meibers - Columbus Business First - July 1, 2021

 

"Two downtown Columbus College of Art and Design buildings are for sale. The Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building and Circle Hall, at 161 and 145 N. Grant Ave., respectively, have been listed for a week and already had a "tremendous" amount of interest, said NAI Equitiies' Peter Merkle, who is handling the listing. ... Columbus College of Art and Design is selling the buildings as part of a plan to raise $20 million and reorganize its downtown campus, as laid out in the college's new five-year strategic plan."

 

Circle Hall:

image.png.4c95af0e574e73efd9f7eba239078014.png

 

Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building:

image.png.5c55bdb58736cbcd0b79c095a3d0977e.png

27 minutes ago, NorthShore647 said:

CCAD puts 2 downtown buildings on the market

Bonnier Meibers - Columbus Business First - July 1, 2021

 

"Two downtown Columbus College of Art and Design buildings are for sale. The Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building and Circle Hall, at 161 and 145 N. Grant Ave., respectively, have been listed for a week and already had a "tremendous" amount of interest, said NAI Equitiies' Peter Merkle, who is handling the listing. ... Columbus College of Art and Design is selling the buildings as part of a plan to raise $20 million and reorganize its downtown campus, as laid out in the college's new five-year strategic plan."

 

Circle Hall:

image.png.4c95af0e574e73efd9f7eba239078014.png

 

Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building:

image.png.5c55bdb58736cbcd0b79c095a3d0977e.png

It would be great if an out of town developer would buy these properties. Hopefully something good is designed and proposed. 

1 hour ago, NorthShore647 said:

CCAD puts 2 downtown buildings on the market

Bonnier Meibers - Columbus Business First - July 1, 2021

 

"Two downtown Columbus College of Art and Design buildings are for sale. The Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building and Circle Hall, at 161 and 145 N. Grant Ave., respectively, have been listed for a week and already had a "tremendous" amount of interest, said NAI Equitiies' Peter Merkle, who is handling the listing. ... Columbus College of Art and Design is selling the buildings as part of a plan to raise $20 million and reorganize its downtown campus, as laid out in the college's new five-year strategic plan."

 

Circle Hall:

image.png.4c95af0e574e73efd9f7eba239078014.png

 

Amelita Mirolo Fine Arts Building:

image.png.5c55bdb58736cbcd0b79c095a3d0977e.png

 

Definitely good news overall. The Mirolo Fine Arts building would make fine apartments or condos with the tall ceilings and warehouse windows. Not sure what they could do with Circle Hall other than tear down and rebuild, but it could make sense as-is for any start up business. And if this sale paves the way for the construction of another building on what I would assume is another empty lot, all the better!

  • 3 weeks later...
On 6/22/2021 at 12:56 PM, NorthShore647 said:

Digging down for the 13-story 195 E Broad Street mixed use project

CLB-6-19-21-32.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-34.jpg

 

CLB-6-19-21-31.jpg

 

Vera on Broad / 366 E. Broad Street Apartment Building

CLB-6-19-21-18.jpg

 

 

Has anyone seen much progress on either of these projects? I haven't driven by either one in a while. I'm guessing they should each add another tower crane to our sky which would be oh so exciting.

3 minutes ago, cbussoccer said:

 

Has anyone seen much progress on either of these projects? I haven't driven by either one in a while. I'm guessing they should each add another tower crane to our sky which would be oh so exciting.

366 East Broad has a decent amount of progress.  The concrete has begun to go vertical.  As of yesterday, the 13 story tower site is still just a big hole in the ground with no equipment on site.

Edited by TH3BUDDHA

I’m more excited for the PNC remodel. That project is going to make broad st. look great for 100 ft or so haha

  • 4 weeks later...

The Columbus Downtown Development Corporation's apartment project at 497 East Town Street is set to go before the HRC at its August meeting. The project includes 98 units and 51 parking spaces in a 5 story structure (same as the CDDC's RFP from earlier in the year). The lot is within the  East Town Street Historic District so it needs approval from both the HRC and Downtown Commission. 

image.png.d4791114b182e0163ebdaed6f95190ca.png

 

Here are some updated renderings and site plans for the project Topiary Park Crossing:

CLB-497-East-Town-7.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-6.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-5.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-1.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-2.png

 

East Town Street Elevation 

CLB-497-East-Town-3.png

 

 

1 minute ago, NorthShore647 said:

The Columbus Downtown Development Corporation's apartment project at 497 East Town Street is set to go before the HRC at its August meeting. The project includes 98 units and 51 parking spaces in a 5 story structure (same as the CDDC's RFP from earlier in the year). The lot is within the  East Town Street Historic District so it needs approval from both the HRC and Downtown Commission. 

image.png.d4791114b182e0163ebdaed6f95190ca.png

 

Here are some updated renderings and site plans for the project Topiary Park Crossing:

CLB-497-East-Town-7.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-6.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-5.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-1.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-2.png

 

East Town Street Elevation 

CLB-497-East-Town-3.png

 

 

 

I'm not crazy about the colors, but I love the design! It's something new and unique. Hopefully it gets approved.

34 minutes ago, cbussoccer said:

 

I'm not crazy about the colors, but I love the design! It's something new and unique. Hopefully it gets approved.

Same. Colors remind me a bit of Thurber Village. Otherwise, I like the look. 

1 hour ago, NorthShore647 said:

CLB-497-East-Town-7.png

 

CLB-497-East-Town-6.png

There are few things I love more than a turret... I actually love this for this area -- referential to all of the mansions we've lost and a great feature for a prominent corner. Agreed colors are a little dated (in a bad way) but otherwise this is really exciting!

New Design Proposed for Affordable Apartments Downtown

 

Two different commissions will soon get a chance to weigh in on an updated design for Topiary Park Crossing, a 98-unit apartment building proposed for 497 E. Town St.

 

The project will be presented to the Downtown Commission on August 24 and – because it is located in the East Town Historic District – to the Historic Resources Commission on August 19.

 

The proposal stands out among recent Downtown development projects because of its focus on affordability.

 

The Columbus Downtown Development Commission (CDDC) bought the 0.7-acre vacant lot in February and posted a request for proposals on its website last spring outlining the parameters for the project, including a requirement that all of the units in the building be affordable to tenants earning between 60 and 100 percent of the area median income (AMI).

 

More below:

https://www.columbusunderground.com/new-design-proposed-for-affordable-apartments-downtown-bw1/

 

Topiary-Park-Crossing-1-1150x550.jpg

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Major event space and restaurant planned for downtown:

 

"Hackman Capital Partners, based in Los Angeles and with offices in Worthington, plans to convert the 33,000-square-foot office and warehouse at 225 Neilston St. into the venue, which would include a large outdoor patio in what is now an alley on the north side of the building."

 

https://www.dispatch.com/story/business/2021/08/20/columbus-restaurant-entertainment-venue-proposed-downtown/8185474002/

 

^Does Columbus have what is considered a “Warehouse District” or is this actually part of another neighborhood? 

8 minutes ago, jeremyck01 said:

^Does Columbus have what is considered a “Warehouse District” or is this actually part of another neighborhood? 

This is part of the “Discovery District” or Neighborhood Launch, whatever it is now.

5 minutes ago, jeremyck01 said:

^Does Columbus have what is considered a “Warehouse District” or is this actually part of another neighborhood? 

I think most consider the "warehouse district" to be the area out by Rickenbacker, where dozens and dozens of warehouses are clustered together.

 

But there is a smaller "warehouse district" on the northern side of downtown.

This is what the dispatch says about the area:

 

"Even though the warehouse district itself has not seen a lot of recent development, the building is near a growing number of new apartments along East Long Street, along with restaurants and bars on N. 4th Street."

 

5 minutes ago, wpcc88 said:

This is part of the “Discovery District” or Neighborhood Launch, whatever it is now.


Thanks. Perhaps this thread should be merged into one of those threads. 
 

I took a street view tour of the area and Spring St. has a lot of parking lots along this stretch. Lots of room for development. 

3 minutes ago, jeremyck01 said:


Thanks. Perhaps this thread should be merged into one of those threads. 
 

I took a street view tour of the area and Spring St. has a lot of parking lots along this stretch. 

Correct… there is a ton of room for growth in that part of Spring, which is inevitable.

 

I think we see a large parking garage(regardless of our opinions & thoughts people still will need to get to work) in that area or on 4th, along with some mixed use/office developments in the future. Long & Gay have infilled with primarily residential, so I think demand will come back for the above.

Nah. Abbott will just sue anyone that's wants to build there. 

4 minutes ago, DTCL11 said:

Nah. Abbott will just sue anyone that's wants to build there. 

I know it won't happen, but I wish Abbott would sell their property downtown and relocate a little further out...

Do they also own that big grassy area where all the semi trucks are parked near there?

Edited by Luvcbus

Yeah, hopefully some actual height development comes in this area. There are so many parking lots and small 1 story buildings in that area. Would be great with apartments and mixed use. 

2 hours ago, Luvcbus said:

Major event space and restaurant planned for downtown:

 

"Hackman Capital Partners, based in Los Angeles and with offices in Worthington, plans to convert the 33,000-square-foot office and warehouse at 225 Neilston St. into the venue, which would include a large outdoor patio in what is now an alley on the north side of the building."

 

https://www.dispatch.com/story/business/2021/08/20/columbus-restaurant-entertainment-venue-proposed-downtown/8185474002/

 

Looks like a good idea. That part of downtown is so depressing to drive through with all the empty buildings and weed-filled lots. Hopefully this will be part of a lot more development there. 

3 minutes ago, amped91 said:

Looks like a good idea. That part of downtown is so depressing to drive through with all the empty buildings and weed-filled lots. Hopefully this will be part of a lot more development there. 

Sounds like a lot of that area is owned by this company...

 

This is from the article:

 "The project would be part of the developer's broader investment in the area, which includes 10 buildings and about 15 empty lots along Neilston, North 5th Street, Mount Vernon Avenue and the large "Icehouse" building at 260 E. Naghten St."

23 minutes ago, Luvcbus said:

Sounds like a lot of that area is owned by this company...

 

This is from the article:

 "The project would be part of the developer's broader investment in the area, which includes 10 buildings and about 15 empty lots along Neilston, North 5th Street, Mount Vernon Avenue and the large "Icehouse" building at 260 E. Naghten St."

Yeah, I saw that. It sounds like this might be the first of several new projects coming from them??

14 minutes ago, amped91 said:

Yeah, I saw that. It sounds like this might be the first of several new projects coming from them??

Yeah, hopefully that means they will invest a good deal into this area. It’s always good to see outside developers who own some land. Seems their projects are always a little better. 

6 hours ago, DTCL11 said:

Nah. Abbott will just sue anyone that's wants to build there. 

I get your sarcasm but a lot of these lots are or were owned by the Schottenstein Family via shell companies.. not sure if that’s still true but a decade ago it was

On 8/20/2021 at 2:42 PM, Luvcbus said:

Major event space and restaurant planned for downtown:

 

"Hackman Capital Partners, based in Los Angeles and with offices in Worthington, plans to convert the 33,000-square-foot office and warehouse at 225 Neilston St. into the venue, which would include a large outdoor patio in what is now an alley on the north side of the building."

 

https://www.dispatch.com/story/business/2021/08/20/columbus-restaurant-entertainment-venue-proposed-downtown/8185474002/

 

Wow, talk about a potential game changer that seemingly came out of nowhere. I had no idea that this one entity controlled so much property in the area. And an out-of-state one at that. Also interesting that they're choosing now to start such a large scale development. Really excited about the possibilities here. 

 

As mentioned, not sure why Columbus' "warehouse district" has never really been marketed as such. I would consider it the area bordered by 4th St. to the West, 670 to the North, Cleveland Ave. to the East, and Spring St. to the South.

 

Of the buildings that remain in the area, there are some nice brick ones there. There is definitely opportunity to make it into a full-fledged district with increased residential and restaurant development. Just really surprised how bad of a neighbor Abbott Labs is being. You'd think they'd be happy about the increased interest in the area and corresponding improvements. Maybe they should just pack up and go to the Rickenbacker area or something. Though I really wish they would also capitalize on the location and consolidate their local offices in a new headquarters building on the grass lot next to the factory. Wishful thinking, I know, but I can dream. 

Screenshot_20210822-122052_Maps.jpg

12 minutes ago, CMHOhio said:

Wow, talk about a potential game changer that seemingly came out of nowhere. I had no idea that this one entity controlled so much property in the area. And an out-of-state one at that. Also interesting that they're choosing now to start such a large scale development. Really excited about the possibilities here. 

 

As mentioned, not sure why Columbus' "warehouse district" has never really been marketed as such. I would consider it the area bordered by 4th St. to the West, 670 to the North, Cleveland Ave. to the East, and Spring St. to the South.

 

Of the buildings that remain in the area, there are some nice brick ones there. There is definitely opportunity to make it into a full-fledged district with increased residential and restaurant development. Just really surprised how bad of a neighbor Abbott Labs is being. You'd think they'd be happy about the increased interest in the area and corresponding improvements. Maybe they should just pack up and go to the Rickenbacker area or something. Though I really wish they would also capitalize on the location and consolidate their local offices in a new headquarters building on the grass lot next to the factory. Wishful thinking, I know, but I can dream. 

Screenshot_20210822-122052_Maps.jpg

According to The City of Columbus:

 

"The Warehouse District is bound by I-670 and the Conrail railroad tracks on the north, Grant Avenue on the east, Long Street on the south, and N. Third Street on the west."

 

"The Warehouse District, located north and west of the Discovery District, is in close proximity to its many institutions and public buildings. Columbus State Community College borders the district on its east; Columbus College of Art and Design on its south. Many other significant institutions located in the Discovery District are within walking distance of the Warehouse District planning area."

13 minutes ago, Luvcbus said:

According to The City of Columbus:

 

"The Warehouse District is bound by I-670 and the Conrail railroad tracks on the north, Grant Avenue on the east, Long Street on the south, and N. Third Street on the west."

I never realized the district was officially recognized. My borders were slightly off, but close. 

 

I re-read the Dispatch article; not sure why they didn't refer to it as such, almost making every attempt to call it something else. My favorite is "warehouse corner" of downtown. 

 

Also, I noticed this will come before the Downtown Comission on Tuesday. I wonder what kind of inane parking requirements they'll make on the proposal. Given it's size, they'll probably want a convention center-grade parking structure 🙄.

Screenshot_20210822-125657_Chrome.jpg

1 minute ago, CMHOhio said:

I never realized the district was officially recognized. My borders were slightly off, but close. 

 

I re-read the Dispatch article; not sure why they didn't refer to it as such, almost making every attempt to call it something else. My favorite is "warehouse corner" of downtown. 

 

Also, I noticed this will come before the Downtown Comission on Tuesday. I wonder what kind of inane parking requirements they'll make on the proposal. Given it's size, they'll probably want a convention center-grade parking structure 🙄.

Screenshot_20210822-125657_Chrome.jpg

I wasn't sure of the exact boundaries either... 

But it was great timing because I had just looked it up last night and posted the boundaries in another discussion.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.