Jump to content

Featured Replies

If they do leave the Breen Center site, won't there be environmental cleanup necessary there as well?  

  • Replies 398
  • Views 41.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • MONDAY, JANUARY 27, 2020 Sherwin-Williams seeks Bedrock site for R&D   It seems that Sherwin-Williams' (SHW) new research and development (R&D) facility may not wander far from

  • Brecksville, DiGeronimo fine-tune big development plan   Brecksville Mayor Jerry Hruby in an email said he is in discussions with "several companies" for possible investments in the suburb 1

  • Not there yet. But they're getting closer to a new R&D home.....   ?

Posted Images

18 minutes ago, mack34 said:

If they do leave the Breen Center site, won't there be environmental cleanup necessary there as well?  

 

Probably. SHW had a paint manufacturing facility there from 1873 to 1979.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

31 minutes ago, mack34 said:

If they do leave the Breen Center site, won't there be environmental cleanup necessary there as well?  

 

If it becomes their parking garage, maybe not.   Or they make it a riverside park, like some 'burbs do when they don't really want to need to dig.

So who pays for that cleanup?  

Unless there was on-site manufacturing, chemical storage or on-site chemical disposal, it's unlikely that there would be a need for site cleanup.

I can't imagine SW would ever leave the Breen site

5 minutes ago, punch said:

I can't imagine SW would ever leave the Breen site

 

SHW is surprisingly sentimental for a Fortune 500 company.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

22 minutes ago, KJP said:

 

SHW is surprisingly sentimental for a Fortune 500 company.

KJP - Are you hearing anything out there?

On 1/20/2020 at 12:01 PM, simplythis said:

KJP - Are you hearing anything out there?

 

Yes, another article likely coming today. Just an update.

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

On 1/20/2020 at 11:38 AM, KJP said:

 

SHW is surprisingly sentimental for a Fortune 500 company.

This is perhaps a good thing. It may be a contributing factor to keeping them in Cleveland.

SHW+Jacobs-Weston+lots-Geowizical1.jpg

 

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2020

Sherwin-Williams HQ+R&D site news may wait until next month

 

A curveball thrown at Sherwin-Williams (SHW) regarding its favored research and development (R&D) facility development site has forced the global coatings giant to postpone announcing where it will put its R&D and headquarters (HQ) facilities.

That's according to sources who spoke off the record because they are not authorized to speak publicly about SHW's efforts to pursue new HQ+R&D facilities.

They said SHW had been preparing to publicly announce the HQ+R&D sites this week. But when SHW's favored site for its 350,000-square-foot R&D facility on Scranton Peninsula turned sour, it began discussions with owners of alternative R&D sites.

 

MORE:

https://neo-trans.blogspot.com/2020/01/sherwin-williams-hqr-site-news-may-wait.html

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

9 minutes ago, KJP said:

SHW+Jacobs-Weston+lots-Geowizical1.jpg

 

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2020

Sherwin-Williams HQ+R&D site news may wait until next month

 

A curveball thrown at Sherwin-Williams (SHW) regarding its favored research and development (R&D) facility development site has forced the global coatings giant to postpone announcing where it will put its R&D and headquarters (HQ) facilities.

That's according to sources who spoke off the record because they are not authorized to speak publicly about SHW's efforts to pursue new HQ+R&D facilities.

They said SHW had been preparing to publicly announce the HQ+R&D sites this week. But when SHW's favored site for its 350,000-square-foot R&D facility on Scranton Peninsula turned sour, it began discussions with owners of alternative R&D sites.

 

MORE:

https://neo-trans.blogspot.com/2020/01/sherwin-williams-hqr-site-news-may-wait.html

 

Honestly, this seems like good news if you ask me. 

So it appears that the R & D site will be downtown

yeah its good news.

 

i hope they choose keeping it right where it is and redeveloping around the breen.

 

outside of that easier, safe and sentimental call, kicking off the upcoming opportunity corridor redevelopment seems another wise and forward looking choice.

 

we'll soon find out.

What is the massing for the FEB & North Coast Harbor?  Are those potential R & D sites

They just need to build R&D on the Bedrock site. Then, build an underground tunnel to connect the to the HQ ? 

3 minutes ago, ASPhotoman said:

They just need to build R&D on the Bedrock site. Then, build an underground tunnel to connect the to the HQ ? 

Maybe they can get the crew from Hogan's Heroes to build the tunnel.

6 minutes ago, simplythis said:

Maybe they can get the crew from Hogan's Heroes to build the tunnel.

 

 

 

spacer.png

 

spacer.png

13 minutes ago, ASPhotoman said:

They just need to build R&D on the Bedrock site. Then, build an underground tunnel to connect the to the HQ ? 

Not being totally familiar with the site down there by the Breen Technology Center, If they decide to expand down

there and put their new R & D center there , Will this take away land for a possible future Juctice Center?

On 1/13/2020 at 9:45 AM, skiwest said:

Dang. It would be nice to have those 1,000 jobs in the city of Cleveland. 

 

The bulk of the 1,000 jobs that were at the Brecksville site are now in the city of Cleveland, at Wade Park.

14 minutes ago, simplythis said:

Maybe they can get the crew from Hogan's Heroes to build the tunnel.

 

That way we'd see nothing.....

5 minutes ago, E Rocc said:

 

The bulk of the 1,000 jobs that were at the Brecksville site are now in the city of Cleveland, at Wade Park.

sesame street idk GIF

20 minutes ago, E Rocc said:

 

That way we'd see nothing.....

 

 

NOTHING!!!!

 

spacer.png

19 minutes ago, E Rocc said:

 

The bulk of the 1,000 jobs that were at the Brecksville site are now in the city of Cleveland, at Wade Park.

 

You've stated this several times regarding a potential move.  Serious question- and I'm not picking, but do you have an affinity for Brecksville?  I don't think there are many on  this forum who will sympathize with an outer-ring suburb losing any jobs to Cleveland.  However, I would be one of those who would dislike a loss of 1,000 jobs from Cleveland to Brecksville.  

 

Having said that, I'm hoping for some news soon on the decision.  At the regional level, a move to Brecksville wouldn't be a loss. But it would for Cleveland, which has lost enough as it is over the last 70 years.

I wonder if it is too late to consider these soon to be available 17 acres of fairly clean land here in Euclid.

 

716347905_Landscape8.5x11FullLegend.thumb.jpg.93c538bf8eb0769e0ce5423091842b84.jpg

 

^Central Middle School- yeah that could be torn down and there wouldn't be too many who would miss it.  But even that location would still be away from downtown, however.  Driving from downtown would be maybe 15 min; the Euclid bus from downtown to that location would be over a half an hour, including the stop at Windemere.

7 minutes ago, musky said:

I wonder if it is too late to consider these soon to be available 17 acres of fairly clean land here in Euclid.

 

716347905_Landscape8.5x11FullLegend.thumb.jpg.93c538bf8eb0769e0ce5423091842b84.jpg

 

That’s probably too far from downtown 

2 minutes ago, Oldmanladyluck said:

^Central Middle School- yeah that could be torn down and there wouldn't be too many who would miss it.  But even that location would still be away from downtown, however.  Driving from downtown would be maybe 15 min; the Euclid bus from downtown to that location would be over a half an hour, including the stop at Windemere.

 

Cool, because it is coming down.

As soon as the new high school is complete.

34 minutes ago, Oldmanladyluck said:

 

You've stated this several times regarding a potential move.  Serious question- and I'm not picking, but do you have an affinity for Brecksville?  I don't think there are many on  this forum who will sympathize with an outer-ring suburb losing any jobs to Cleveland.  However, I would be one of those who would dislike a loss of 1,000 jobs from Cleveland to Brecksville.  

 

Having said that, I'm hoping for some news soon on the decision.  At the regional level, a move to Brecksville wouldn't be a loss. But it would for Cleveland, which has lost enough as it is over the last 70 years.

 

No affinity, but geese and ganders come to mind.

37 minutes ago, musky said:

I wonder if it is too late to consider these soon to be available 17 acres of fairly clean land here in Euclid.

 

716347905_Landscape8.5x11FullLegend.thumb.jpg.93c538bf8eb0769e0ce5423091842b84.jpg

 

Welcome to the club.  ?

Heresy.png

1 hour ago, simplythis said:

What is the massing for the FEB & North Coast Harbor?  Are those potential R & D sites

 

Other unrelated development sites.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

25 minutes ago, freefourur said:

The city should resurrect this site for ShW R&D

 

https://www.cleveland.com/business/2012/08/geis_cos_float_plan_for_lakefr.html

 

"Synergy to the airport" sounds sexy. I'm actually surprised Sherwin - or some other company wouldn't jump on this site. The drawback I guess would be whether a strict, non-public use makes sense for this stretch of waterfront. From the article it seems the city and Geis are floating a more accessible mixed plan. 

1 minute ago, surfohio said:

 

"Synergy to the airport" sounds sexy. I'm actually surprised Sherwin - or some other company wouldn't jump on this site. The drawback I guess would be whether a strict, non-public use makes sense for this stretch of waterfront. From the article it seems the city and Geis are floating a more accessible mixed plan. 

The Geis plan s dead at this point.  But a plan could be put together that keeps waterfront access just like they could do along the river. 

4 minutes ago, freefourur said:

The Geis plan s dead at this point.  But a plan could be put together that keeps waterfront access just like they could do along the river. 

Huh, I sort of figured. Their renderings for the site plan went from "great" to "meh" pretty quickly. 

 

Anyhow waiting on the R&D site and HQ design is making me anxious lol.

I will be at the SW PCG sales meeting in Orlando Feb 9-12 and will let you know of anything I hear/see there related to this.

1 hour ago, E Rocc said:

 

No affinity, but geese and ganders come to mind.

Like that gander hasn’t had more than its fair share of gandering for 40 years

  • ColDayMan changed the title to Cleveland: Downtown: Sherwin-Williams Research & Development Center

Bedrock

On 1/18/2020 at 4:52 PM, Frmr CLEder said:

We all seem to have overlooked what was an original alternative for the combined HQ and R&D; the Bedrock site.

 

Couldn't just R&D locate there, with PS/Weston for HQ?

 

3 minutes ago, Frmr CLEder said:

 


@KJP has noted several times that the high cost of taller buildings if putting R&D on the Weston lots makes it cost inhibitive for such a conservative organization. 
 

^^ that digital argument makes my double down on my cyber security risk > physical risk argument. Corporate espionage can happen just as easily in Brecksville in 2020 than it can downtown. 

Asked....

On 1/18/2020 at 4:14 PM, LlamaLawyer said:

Is there any inherent reason the R&D couldn’t be on the Weston site too? If the site for the R&D is truly up in the air, then I would hope the city is pitching this idea to SHW too and at least talking about what kind of incentives could make it happen. 
 

This is all assuming SHW isn’t just trying to get a better deal from the city (which would be smart on SHW’s part and unsurprising).

 

And answered.....

On 1/18/2020 at 4:33 PM, KJP said:

Because putting the R&D on the Weston lots means building a taller, more expensive tower on the Jacobs lot. It's cheaper to put the R&D elsewhere. 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I wish this could have gone on the Weston site at Madison and Berea.

I suppose we could set up a GoFundMe account to defray the cost of a taller tower.  ?

 

43 minutes ago, jws said:

I wish this could have gone on the Weston site at Madison and Berea.

 

Glidden used to have a field of paint samples facing southwest at Berea and W117th. There's precedent.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

13 minutes ago, Dougal said:

 

Glidden used to have a field of paint samples facing southwest at Berea and W117th. There's precedent.

The former Glidden property along Berea is still very much an active site owned by NPA Coatings, too. Weston doesn't appear to have anyone in Phase I of the Midland site, but I doubt SW would want to move into someone else's office park-style building. Not sure what potential there would be to takeover the remaining Phase II.

On 1/22/2020 at 1:43 PM, E Rocc said:

 

No affinity, but geese and ganders come to mind.

 

To have a strong region, the core needs to be strong. While the region has improved over the past 10-20 years, we're still more "donut" than we should be when it comes to residential and commercial density in the center and then reducing as you move out from that center. So it's not hypocritical to say "stealing" a certain number of jobs from Cleveland to the suburbs is bad but Cleveland stealing jobs from the suburbs is good. It's helping correct the lopsidedness of the region.

??Correct. Cleveland is the “brain” of the region, and instead of treating it like an actual head injury, we keep on thinking that moisturizing the extremities will somehow fix the core problem. it doesn’t make any sense, and the continued competition between the “brain” (Cleveland) and the “body” (the 38 other cities that surround it) will just further diminish the entire region. if the Cleveland area was a doctor that was responsible for the management of CTE, we would currently making sure Aaron Hernandez was icing his quads. In order for the body to survive, the brain has to be healthy and functional, not the other way around. 

That's enough metaphors to last a month!

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I’m in grad school. I can only speak in metaphor! But that is to say, Cleveland needs to do everything in its power to lure the R&D to the city limits because the region will suffer if more potential jobs end up in the burbs. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.