November 25, 200816 yr Here are the 2008 rankings - Notice the difference from the one's I posted earlier. Springfield, OH went from being the 52nd most dangerous to 132nd. I have to look at their so called methodology of ranking metro areas because the variations differ drastically from year to year. 2007 Rankings Top 6 Metro areas (most dangerous) #1 Detroit, MI #2 Memphis, TN #3 Las Vegas, NV #4 Flint, MI #5 PineBluff, AR #6 Saginaw, MI For Ohio Metro Areas #52 most dangerous Springfield, OH #62 most dangerous Columbus, OH #70 most dangerous Lima,OH #72 most dangerous Toledo,OH #117 most dangerous Cleveland,OH #145 most dangerous Dayton, OH #156 most dangerous Cincinnati, OH #191 most dangerous Mansfield, OH #289 most dangerous Sandusky, OH 2008 rankings Top 6 most dangerous metros #1 PineBluff, AR #2 Memphis, TN #3 New Orleans, LA #4 Las Vegas, NV #5 Sumster, SC #6 Florence, SC ** Detroit was first in last years metro area for most dangerous but was omitted from these rankings due to no available data. This was the case for Atlanta, Minneapolis and several other cities as well. ** Another interesting note there are cities like Chicago who are always omitted from the rankings due to some unavailable data and this is the case every year. Maybe all cities should just start saying they don't have data? Anyway carrying on Ohio Most Dangerous Metro Areas #67 Columbus #100 Cleveland #110 Toledo #132 Springfield #140 Lima #162 Cincinnati #167 Dayton #171 Mansfield #174 Akron #317 Wheeling WV-OH Not sure how important population is in these rankings not like they are well done anyway is that the population for some of the cities that increased were reduced dramatically. Cleveland for instance in the 2007 ranking had a metro population about 120k larger then the metro number they used in 2008. Anyway I guess I shouldn't get to caught up in misleading numbers and rankings that omit cities like Detroit just because they had incomplete data. http://os.cqpress.com/citycrime/MetroCrime2008_Rank_Rev.pdf
November 25, 200816 yr Sorry about no links http://www.walletpop.com/mortgages/dangerous-cities?icid=200100397x1214027203x1200885836
November 26, 200816 yr I didn't tell anyone about the incident since I had a train to catch and didn't want to deal with it, and the CCTV cameras are ineffective in England (just google it and read some news stories), despite their effectiveness (though somewhat futile) against Jason Bourne. DISCLAIMER THIS IS NOT AN ATTACK! ::) Have you reported this since then? I personally believe when you say nothing, you're just as much apart of the problem as the people/persons who cause the problem. I feel like when we dont say anything we possibly let the problem continue or the next person to be put in that situation might not be able to defend themselves. If you have the opportunity, please call, you call could prevent this from happening again. Just so I get this straight... You think the victim is as much to blame as the criminal?!? One commits the crime, the other suffers from it. Yet you think that the one who suffers is as responsible?
December 15, 200816 yr This one might be an all time new low. Daniel Petric killed mother, shot father because they took Halo 3 video game, prosecutors say Posted by Michael Sangiacomo/Plain Dealer Reporter December 15, 2008 10:47AM ELYRIA — Daniel Petric was so angry that his father would not allow him to play the violent video game Halo 3 that he killed his mother and shot his father, then tried to make it appear to be a murder-suicide, prosecutors told a Lorain County judge this morning in the boy's murder trial. More at cleveland.com: http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2008/12/boy_killed_mom_and_shot_dad_ov.html
December 15, 200816 yr Yeah. This is pretty crazy. I would put the responsibility back on his parents, though. Not that he isn't to blame or that he didn't have a choice here. He did, and he made it alone. But it sounds like this was a really extreme cry for help, and I'm wondering what his family life was really like.
December 25, 200816 yr From newsnet5com: Police: Art McKoy Arrested During Barbershop Drug Raid http://www.newsnet5.com/news/18353388/detail.html POSTED: 12:41 pm EST December 24, 2008 UPDATED: 1:33 pm EST December 24, 2008 EAST CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Police said they arrested community activist Art McKoy and seized half a kilo of cocaine during a raid of McKoy's East Cleveland barbershop. SWAT and Street Crimes police units conducted the raid of the Superfly Barbershop, on Euclid Avenue, and a nearby Cleveland home. Police arrested McKoy, Leroy Sheets and Earl Nash during the raid. East Cleveland Police Chief Ralph Spotts said the arrests are the result of an investigation that began in February and included numerous undercover drug buys at the barbershop. Spotts called the alleged activity a "major drug distribution operation" in the city. clevelandskyscrapers.com Cleveland Skyscrapers on Instagram
January 1, 200916 yr Cleveland homicides down 25% in 2008 Mayor credits efforts of both police, citizens Thursday, January 01, 2009 Mark Puente / Plain Dealer Reporter http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1230802268314400.xml&coll=2&thispage=1 Thirty-two fewer people died in homicides in Cleveland last year than they did the year before. And as the city ramped up efforts to get guns off the streets, fewer were used to commit crimes in 2008. But Mayor Frank Jackson isn't calling the crime reduction a success. ... To reach this Plain Dealer reporter: [email protected], 216-999-4141
January 2, 200916 yr from Cleveland.com Cleveland's first homicide of 2009 happened just after midnight Cleveland's first homicide of 2009 occurred about 50 minutes into the new year when a 26-year-old Cleveland man was shot on Alice Ave., police said. Djuan V. Newsome apparently received a single shotgun wound to the head at 12:51 a.m., around the corner from Malibu Joe's Bar on E. 71st. Officers are interviewing witnesses to the shooting.
January 23, 200916 yr The owner of Lucy's Sweet Surrender bakery in Shaker was shot and robbed a couple of days ago. Bullet clean through the shoulder. They are now trying to find a way to get out of the area. Just terrible. http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/123270305736440.xml&coll=2
January 23, 200916 yr The owner of Lucy's Sweet Surrender bakery in Shaker was shot and robbed a couple of days ago. Bullet clean through the shoulder. They are now trying to find a way to get out of the area. Just terrible. http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/123270305736440.xml&coll=2 NO!!! OMG
January 23, 200916 yr I thought about looking into Shaker Square. But... 1. Lucy's getting shot 2. attempted robbery last night http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/intruder_killed_during_home_in.html **I should add this had a happy ending :-D 3. car jacking at Shaker Square ATM javascript:playVideo('3369426', 'Woman%20Carjacked%20At%20Gunpoint%20On%20Shaker%20Square', 'v', 'News', '117500', 'Search%20Results', '', '','flv'); Just a little too high a price to pay for me.
January 23, 200916 yr Before making that decision, you may not want to jump to a decision based off of recent events. Instead, take a look at longer periods of time for crimes, the areas they are in, who is committing them (on whom), and spend some time there at all hours of the day and night. Don't let some random crimes deter you from an area that you may find to be your home.
January 23, 200916 yr Before making that decision, you may not want to jump to a decision based off of recent events. Instead, take a look at longer periods of time for crimes, the areas they are in, who is committing them (on whom), and spend some time there at all hours of the day and night. Don't let some random crimes deter you from an area that you may find to be your home. I agree with that. But that's a pretty big spree. I don't remember Tremont having such random acts of violence in such a short period of time (there were a number of muggings of restaurant-goers 2 Octobers ago). It also would likely never happen in many other areas, including the WHD. It irritates me because it is such a lovely area.
January 23, 200916 yr I agree with that. But that's a pretty big spree. I don't remember Tremont having such random acts of violence in such a short period of time (there were a number of muggings of restaurant-goers 2 Octobers ago). It also would likely never happen in many other areas, including the WHD. It irritates me because it is such a lovely area. I don't follow the crime reports enough to help out with any information (maybe someone else does) - good luck in your decision making.
January 23, 200916 yr I thought about looking into Shaker Square. But... 1. Lucy's getting shot 2. attempted robbery last night http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/intruder_killed_during_home_in.html **I should add this had a happy ending :-D 3. car jacking at Shaker Square ATM javascript:playVideo('3369426', 'Woman%20Carjacked%20At%20Gunpoint%20On%20Shaker%20Square', 'v', 'News', '117500', 'Search%20Results', '', '','flv'); Just a little too high a price to pay for me. ^That's fair enough, but the first two crimes occurred in what is recognized as the more run-down and dangerous quadrant of the broader neighborhood. It's like writing off Ohio City for what happens in the Lakeview projects. The third link doesn't seem to work, but the words in the link sound pretty scary- anyone have more info about this?
January 23, 200916 yr ^Go to woio.com (aka sensationalism at its best) and click on their video features on the right side of the page. clevelandskyscrapers.com Cleveland Skyscrapers on Instagram
January 23, 200916 yr I thought about looking into Shaker Square. But... 1. Lucy's getting shot 2. attempted robbery last night http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/intruder_killed_during_home_in.html **I should add this had a happy ending ;D 3. car jacking at Shaker Square ATM javascript:playVideo('3369426', 'Woman%20Carjacked%20At%20Gunpoint%20On%20Shaker%20Square', 'v', 'News', '117500', 'Search%20Results', '', '','flv'); Just a little too high a price to pay for me. Whoa. You're going to let these to things influence your decision? I've lived in this area for 37 of my 42 years. The general Shaker Square (Ashwood/Forest to Fairhill and Coventry to 127 Street) area is very safe and a crime can happen anywhere. I've owned on the square for what seems an eternity and I've never been the victim of a crime. My 8 y/o nephew, 9 y/o niece, my cousin's girlfriends 8 y/o son frequent Lucy's on their own or ride their bikes/walk in the area and have never been bothered. Spend some time in my neighborhood before rushing to judgement.
January 23, 200916 yr I have some friends in Shaker Square who have lived there for a couple years now and they've never had an issue (I had asked them about the area when I was deciding where to live).
January 24, 200916 yr I thought about looking into Shaker Square. But... 1. Lucy's getting shot 2. attempted robbery last night http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/intruder_killed_during_home_in.html **I should add this had a happy ending ;D 3. car jacking at Shaker Square ATM javascript:playVideo('3369426', 'Woman%20Carjacked%20At%20Gunpoint%20On%20Shaker%20Square', 'v', 'News', '117500', 'Search%20Results', '', '','flv'); Just a little too high a price to pay for me. Whoa. You're going to let these to things influence your decision? Ummm yes. Crime influences my decision, just as access to public transportation does. Is there anyone out there who does not take crime into consideration? :wtf:
January 24, 200916 yr I thought about looking into Shaker Square. But... 1. Lucy's getting shot 2. attempted robbery last night http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/intruder_killed_during_home_in.html **I should add this had a happy ending ;D 3. car jacking at Shaker Square ATM javascript:playVideo('3369426', 'Woman%20Carjacked%20At%20Gunpoint%20On%20Shaker%20Square', 'v', 'News', '117500', 'Search%20Results', '', '','flv'); Just a little too high a price to pay for me. Whoa. You're going to let these to things influence your decision? Ummm yes. Crime influences my decision, just as access to public transportation does. Is there anyone out there who does not take crime into consideration? :wtf: I think you have misunderstood my question. Are you going to give these two singular events, weighted influence in your decision? This crime could have happened anywhere. This area is one of the safest in the city and region.
January 24, 200916 yr I think you have misunderstood my question. Are you going to give these two singular events, weighted influence in your decision? This crime could have happened anywhere. This area is one of the safest in the city and region. I agree. You do have to take the bigger picture into consideration. What's the area like for crime overall, etc? And I'm not talking about personal experience. I'm talking about stats. That's what I'd use. But it's hard for me to say what I'd do in such a situation. I'd like to think I'd stick around in a neighborhood that was predominantly safe, even though I got shot. Because that can happen anywhere. But then, I've never gotten shot.
January 25, 200916 yr I have spent a lot of time (although not recently) in Shaker Buckeye and not had a problem . This is a VERY unfortunate blip. I agree with Jpop though. Unless you have been shot, you cannot say whether you would stay or go. If someone is crime victim, they want to regain control of their well being. The easiest most impulsive thing is to move away from the area of the bad memory-regardless of whether it will truly keep them safer. I hope Lucy's realizes they have a community that cares for them.
January 25, 200916 yr This may be a personal opinion...I work with the Buckeye area and I don't associate it with Shaker Square. I know that that they are contiguous, but they are different worlds. Even though Buckeye's crime rate has dropped dramatically from the 90s, it still has a very different feel than SS's.
January 25, 200916 yr This may be a personal opinion...I work with the Buckeye area and I don't associate it with Shaker Square. I know that that they are contiguous, but they are different worlds. Even though Buckeye's crime rate has dropped dramatically from the 90s, it still has a very different feel than SS's. What part of Buckeye? Saying that Buckeye isn't associated with the Square is the same as saying Larchmere isn't associated with SS. All three are considered Shaker Square. Because the blocks are so long, one you are south & west of Forest, it's the "fringe" area. The SS area extends to Livingston.
January 26, 200916 yr When I was looking for my last apartment I considered every noteworthy neighborhood around town. Like they taught me in college, I made a decision matrix to help balance the issues. Each neighborhood got point values in various categories. Each category carried a certain weight, multiply through, total up, and you get a final value per neighborhood. The winner was Midtown, due to its high scores in cheapness and proximity to CSU. These were the two most heavily weighted factors. It also got some boost from the Agora, as music venues were another criteria. Midtown scored very poorly in crime/safety, but I believed that deficiency was seriously outweiged. I was wrong. The crime/safety situation was pretty bad around there and I moved out largely for that reason. It became clear that I had not given that category a strong enough multiplier. One of my neighbors was sliced up, others confronted guns, cars were frequently robbed in the lot, and this one crackhead refused to stop living in the foyer. My next moving decision involved a roommate, with a preference for Lakewood, so the choice was simpler this time. Moral: It isn't wise to blow off crime concerns. I can't tell you exactly what crime is like around Shaker Square, but if you're interested you can find out. On my matrix that area got a moderate rating for crime. Cost was my biggest factor and that knocked it out of contention.
January 26, 200916 yr LOL, I thought I was the only one who made a "decision matrix" with weighted categories and scoring when I decided where to live! I have to agree, though, that safety matters alot. And I'd bet it varies quite a bit going from SS to Buckeye, though I'll have to try to look up some numbers to back that up. I've never seen the two areas considered as one, except for the City Planning Commissions "Statistical Planning Areas" which are really poor approximations of what people would consider neighborhoods.
January 26, 200916 yr LOL, I thought I was the only one who made a "decision matrix" with weighted categories and scoring when I decided where to live! Well, mine sucked. Did yours go any better?
January 26, 200916 yr Surprisingly, no. The way I weighted public transit access made Downtown's public transit hub swamp all else all other factors and neighborhoods, though I've ended up using transit only occasionally in real life. I think that I ended up abandoning the matrix and just going with Downtown anyway.
January 26, 200916 yr LOL, I thought I was the only one who made a "decision matrix" with weighted categories and scoring when I decided where to live! I have to agree, though, that safety matters alot. And I'd bet it varies quite a bit going from SS to Buckeye, though I'll have to try to look up some numbers to back that up. I've never seen the two areas considered as one, except for the City Planning Commissions "Statistical Planning Areas" which are really poor approximations of what people would consider neighborhoods. I too list "pros" and "cons" along with stats when making decisions. My ward is the named Buckeye-Shaker. More of the ward is along Buckeye and Western Shaker, than it is along Larchmere. Most people believe that Shaker Square only consist of the Area between Larchmere/S. Woodland-Buckeye. When in essence, part of Ward 6 (north of Larchmere) and several streets in Shaker Heights are in the Shaker Square neighborhood.
January 26, 200916 yr This may be a personal opinion...I work with the Buckeye area and I don't associate it with Shaker Square. I know that that they are contiguous, but they are different worlds. Even though Buckeye's crime rate has dropped dramatically from the 90s, it still has a very different feel than SS's. What part of Buckeye? Saying that Buckeye isn't associated with the Square is the same as saying Larchmere isn't associated with SS. All three are considered Shaker Square. Because the blocks are so long, one you are south & west of Forest, it's the "fringe" area. The SS area extends to Livingston. No, saying that about Buckeye is not the same as saying that about Larchmere. Larchmere is an extension of the dining and retail line-up of Shaker Square. Buckeye...not so much. Outside of Buckeye Commons, there is precious little non-social service, non-day care retail left on Buckeye, and other than Lucy's (which seems likely to move or close now), pretty much nothing to appeal to anyone other than residents of the immediate neighborhood. Again, Buckeye is by no means the scariest part of the City, but it is definitely outside of my crime comfort zone for apartment hunting, and I suspect lots of Shaker Square residents feel the same way.
January 26, 200916 yr This may be a personal opinion...I work with the Buckeye area and I don't associate it with Shaker Square. I know that that they are contiguous, but they are different worlds. Even though Buckeye's crime rate has dropped dramatically from the 90s, it still has a very different feel than SS's. What part of Buckeye? Saying that Buckeye isn't associated with the Square is the same as saying Larchmere isn't associated with SS. All three are considered Shaker Square. Because the blocks are so long, one you are south & west of Forest, it's the "fringe" area. The SS area extends to Livingston. No, saying that about Buckeye is not the same as saying that about Larchmere. Larchmere is an extension of the dining and retail line-up of Shaker Square. Buckeye...not so much. Outside of Buckeye Commons, there is precious little non-social service, non-day care retail left on Buckeye, and other than Lucy's (which seems likely to move or close now), pretty much nothing to appeal to anyone other than residents of the immediate neighborhood. Again, Buckeye is by no means the scariest part of the City, but it is definitely outside of my crime comfort zone for apartment hunting, and I suspect lots of Shaker Square residents feel the same way. But Larchmere hasn't always been that way and personally I don't think that Buckeye is that bad. And each of us have a differnt level of comfort. Most people that live in the area, on the Buckeye or the Larchmere side, are going to come to the Square for there needs anyway.
January 26, 200916 yr Surprisingly, no. The way I weighted public transit access made Downtown's public transit hub swamp all else all other factors and neighborhoods, though I've ended up using transit only occasionally in real life. I think that I ended up abandoning the matrix and just going with Downtown anyway. I think that's why a matrix doesn't really help much. Through the selection of weights, you end up solidifying your existing preferences. You wanted transit access and the matrix gave it to you. I wanted cheap and I got it. Maybe the real benefit was not in deciding #1 but seeing how close the other options were. In my case Lakewood initially had the most points, but I really wanted to move closer, so I went through and boosted the importance of proximity. That's where I screwed up. Downtown also did well despite getting zeros in several categories. Near west options were in the next tier. All the east side options rated poorly. The advantages they offer weren't germain to my situation.
January 26, 200916 yr LOL, I thought I was the only one who made a "decision matrix" with weighted categories and scoring when I decided where to live! I have to agree, though, that safety matters alot. And I'd bet it varies quite a bit going from SS to Buckeye, though I'll have to try to look up some numbers to back that up. I've never seen the two areas considered as one, except for the City Planning Commissions "Statistical Planning Areas" which are really poor approximations of what people would consider neighborhoods. I too list "pros" and "cons" along with stats when making decisions. My ward is the named Buckeye-Shaker. More of the ward is along Buckeye and Western Shaker, than it is along Larchmere. Most people believe that Shaker Square only consist of the Area between Larchmere/S. Woodland-Buckeye. When in essence, part of Ward 6 (north of Larchmere) and several streets in Shaker Heights are in the Shaker Square neighborhood. Ward and neighborhood are two different things. My neighborhood is Downtown. My ward also includes parts but not all of Tremont, Ohio City, the Flats, and St. Clair/Superior.
January 26, 200916 yr LOL, I thought I was the only one who made a "decision matrix" with weighted categories and scoring when I decided where to live! I have to agree, though, that safety matters alot. And I'd bet it varies quite a bit going from SS to Buckeye, though I'll have to try to look up some numbers to back that up. I've never seen the two areas considered as one, except for the City Planning Commissions "Statistical Planning Areas" which are really poor approximations of what people would consider neighborhoods. I too list "pros" and "cons" along with stats when making decisions. My ward is the named Buckeye-Shaker. More of the ward is along Buckeye and Western Shaker, than it is along Larchmere. Most people believe that Shaker Square only consist of the Area between Larchmere/S. Woodland-Buckeye. When in essence, part of Ward 6 (north of Larchmere) and several streets in Shaker Heights are in the Shaker Square neighborhood. Ward and neighborhood are two different things. My neighborhood is Downtown. My ward also includes parts but not all of Tremont, Ohio City, the Flats, and St. Clair/Superior. Hence my earlier comments and my comment that the majority of my neighborhood is spread among two wards in cleveland and part of Shaker Heights.
January 26, 200916 yr Police are saying the strangling incident was drug related and not a random break in. If I read it right it was someone demanding money. http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/deadly_confrontation_was_drug_1.html
January 27, 200916 yr A bystander got shot at a gas station in Tremont early this morning. Nice. http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/bystander_shot_by_wouldbe_robb.html
January 27, 200916 yr Maybe this should be directed at the RTA thread (still unclear the ground rules for crime related questions that occur on a train or platform)... Anyways, I always argue that waiting at the platform is much more dangerous than once you're on the train, are there any statistics to back it up? Also, the detective for the UC police never called me back regarding the drug deal witnessed at the Adelbert platform. Regarding the Tremont gas station hold up, that does not really surprise me, considering it happened at like 2,30am (I'm not implying that it's somehow the victim's fault). I wonder if the gas station has a policy that clerks are to surrender the money upon any attempted robbery and, if so, could the clerk's non-compliance give rise to some sort of negligence lawsuit.
January 27, 200916 yr Regarding the Tremont gas station hold up, that does not really surprise me, considering it happened at like 2,30am (I'm not implying that it's somehow the victim's fault). I wonder if the gas station has a policy that clerks are to surrender the money upon any attempted robbery and, if so, could the clerk's non-compliance give rise to some sort of negligence lawsuit. Doesn't sound like something a jury would go for. "This guy was so bad at being a crime victim that he should owe money for it. Everyone knows you have to let the robber win."
January 27, 200916 yr Regarding the Tremont gas station hold up, that does not really surprise me, considering it happened at like 2,30am (I'm not implying that it's somehow the victim's fault). I wonder if the gas station has a policy that clerks are to surrender the money upon any attempted robbery and, if so, could the clerk's non-compliance give rise to some sort of negligence lawsuit. Doesn't sound like something a jury would go for. "This guy was so bad at being a crime victim that he should owe money for it. Everyone knows you have to let the robber win." No...You don't. When I was a victim of an atempted robbery I refused to give up my stuff. People work to hard to just give up stuff. I'm one who's going to fight.
January 27, 200916 yr The clerk was behind bulletproof glass. clevelandskyscrapers.com Cleveland Skyscrapers on Instagram
January 27, 200916 yr Regarding the Tremont gas station hold up, that does not really surprise me, considering it happened at like 2,30am (I'm not implying that it's somehow the victim's fault). I wonder if the gas station has a policy that clerks are to surrender the money upon any attempted robbery and, if so, could the clerk's non-compliance give rise to some sort of negligence lawsuit. Doesn't sound like something a jury would go for. "This guy was so bad at being a crime victim that he should owe money for it. Everyone knows you have to let the robber win." I'm saying if Sunoco has a policy that all clerks are to give up the money, yet this clerk refused. Therefore, because of this clerk's refusal to comply with Sunoco's policy, there is a prima facie case that the clerk was negligent. On account of the clerk's negligence, the piece of scum I hope he gets publicly executed robber, shoots the bystander. Under respondeat superior, the bystander would go after Sunoco.
January 27, 200916 yr ^Good point. The bystander was definitely in Cardozo's "foreseeable zone of danger."
January 27, 200916 yr I get where you're coming from, but it's tough to hold A responsible for B's crime. The bystander was hurt by the criminal, not by the gas station, and private entities aren't generally expected to anticipate or protect others from criminal acts. Let's say you get the door open for a negligence claim. Failing to follow internal procedures is not negligence per se. You'd probably have to show that the attendant knew or should have known that the robber would shoot that bystander. Good luck. I'm not saying the claim would never fly, but it's pretty weak. Edit: It's been a while since I read it, but I don't think the "danger zone" case involved a criminal act. I thought it was a series of mishaps that ended in somebody dropping their dynamite (?)
January 27, 200916 yr ^You are right, this is a pretty weak claim. Companies are not expected to anticipate criminal acts. However, it would be worth a try if your the injured plaintiff.
January 27, 200916 yr This is a powerful tool. --- http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1233048654242240.xml&coll=2 Cleveland Police Department's Web site allows residents to track crime data Tuesday, January 27, 2009 Mark Puente Plain Dealer Reporter Crime statistics are now only a keystroke away for Cleveland residents on the Police Department's modernized Web site.
January 27, 200916 yr Very interesting site. More robberies around Lower Euclid/Prospect/East 4th then I had expected. And hoped!
January 27, 200916 yr Very interesting site. More robberies around Lower Euclid/Prospect/East 4th then I had expected. And hoped! Same for SS. I'm shocked. Hell, there was a break in right behind me.
Create an account or sign in to comment