Jump to content

Featured Replies

Me neither! Now that original picture doesn't look as good as I originally thought!

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Views 512k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • As of 8/14/21

  • BTW, the reason why I was asking someone this morning about the status of Flats East Bank Phase 3B (the 12-story apartment building) is because Wolstein is getting involved in another big project. Whe

  • urbanetics_
    urbanetics_

    These are REALLY coming along!! I know I’ve said it before, but I just can’t get over how amazing the design, scale/density, boardwalk frontage, windows, multi-level outdoor spaces, etc. all are. Espe

Posted Images

That's cool!  Do they actually have northward facing windows in there?

 

 

Yep, there's windows facing north.  This is a google maps shot from W.9th of the corner of W.9th and Front Ave.

 

 

Port+of+Cleveland2.jpg

 

Cool--I guess I never really noticed or paid attention!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Author

Downtown/Flats Design Review District

Agenda

October 3rd, 2013 9:30am

City Hall, Room 514, 601 Lakeside Avenue

 

2. DF2013-066: Flipside Restaurant New Construction - Concept Approval

Project Location: West 10th and Front Avenue

Project Representative: Steve Ciciretto, Architect

 

http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/designreview/drcagenda/2013/10032013/100313%20DRAC%20agenda.pdf

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

That must be the small building next to the Waterfront Line viaduct in the plans.

  • Author

That must be the small building next to the Waterfront Line viaduct in the plans.

 

It is. Graphics have now been posted.....

 

Flipside_03.jpg

 

Flipside_04.jpg

 

Flipside_05.jpg

 

Flipside_06.jpg

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I love it! In this case, I feel that a single story, single use building works well

^Nice to see the momentum continuing.  Prospects should be good for this new spot.  From the looks of things, the 3-4 restaurants/spots opened so far in FEB have been wildly successful, which is doubly great given that there's so little down there at this point.

I love it! In this case, I feel that a single story, single use building works well

 

Agree. When you get closer to the water you don't want tall buildings shading out everything.

 

Agree. When you get closer to the water you don't want tall buildings shading out everything.

 

But that's going to happen with the planned multi-story apt. building which will rise along the  boardwalk ...which we want, of course.

Took me a while to figure out why the perspective rendering there didn't match up to the site plan... only just now realized the rendering is of a Columbus location.  I hope our version doesn't have the same cheesy "custom artwork," but otherwise looks like the right kind of thing to fill that scrap of land.

I love it! In this case, I feel that a single story, single use building works well

 

I disagree.  It is an odd site but they should have made this at least a two story building with offices above.  That is actually what is noted on the original leasing plan.  Building 10, Office over Restaurant.  In my opinion, single story buildings do not belong in a city.

 

Agree. When you get closer to the water you don't want tall buildings shading out everything.

 

But that's going to happen with the planned multi-story apt. building which will rise along the  boardwalk ...which we want, of course.

 

I think this is a pretty healthy setback:

 

http://www2.coolcleveland.com/images/002009/082609/EastBankFlatsDay.jpg

 

Took me a while to figure out why the perspective rendering there didn't match up to the site plan... only just now realized the rendering is of a Columbus location.  I hope our version doesn't have the same cheesy "custom artwork," but otherwise looks like the right kind of thing to fill that scrap of land.

 

It's really more of a branding/concept study. They are going to build one in Columbus, but it was included with this submittal so you could see the concept and materials.

I'm not sure what you mean by "cheesy custom artwork". This isn't an Applebee's and I can't really say that I can think off the top of my head of any artwork being incorporated into restaurant signage in Cleveland. I don't really consider something like what Brasa has as a piece of art as opposed to just an eye catcher.

^Oh, for sure, I understand why the Columbus rendering is shown--I was just confessing my own inability to read.  You'll note that the Columbus rendering has big signage panels labeled on the plan as "Custom Artwork painted on wood boards." That's what I'm hoping we don't get in our branch.  A giant "craft beer" sign with a wheat farmer? Looks like it was ripped from a state fair midway or something.

You'll note that the Columbus rendering has big signage panels labeled on the plan as "Custom Artwork painted on wood boards." That's what I'm hoping we don't get in our branch.  A giant "craft beer" sign with a wheat farmer? Looks like it was ripped from a state fair midway or something.

 

Agree.  Also, the random words at the top of the building are cheesy as well.  It reminds me of one of those fake Irish pubs, like Claddagh.

You'll note that the Columbus rendering has big signage panels labeled on the plan as "Custom Artwork painted on wood boards." That's what I'm hoping we don't get in our branch.  A giant "craft beer" sign with a wheat farmer? Looks like it was ripped from a state fair midway or something.

 

Agree.  Also, the random words at the top of the building are cheesy as well.  It reminds me of one of those fake Irish pubs, like Claddagh.

 

Correct, a state fair is what I think they would be going for. Farm-to-table is huge right now (think organic).

 

They are not using the lettering at the top of the building. The image was used to show the lighting being used, not the lettering.

^Oh, for sure, I understand why the Columbus rendering is shown--I was just confessing my own inability to read.  You'll note that the Columbus rendering has big signage panels labeled on the plan as "Custom Artwork painted on wood boards." That's what I'm hoping we don't get in our branch.  A giant "craft beer" sign with a wheat farmer? Looks like it was ripped from a state fair midway or something.

 

Uhhh, barley, maybe?

^Doh! Major grain fail. Now that it's October I can't even pretend I was thinking about weissbier. 

looks austin-ish. thats probably a good thing. it will attract the alofters.

  • 2 weeks later...

Flats East Bank developers refinance Ernst & Young Tower, securing $92 million loan from Citigroup

 

Putting new debt without personal liability on the tower "certainly helps us in the sense that it frees up capital from the family that would have otherwise had to go into the office building that can be redeployed into the next phase of the project," Wolstein said.

 

He hopes to close a public-private financing deal within 60 days for the next wave of development. Updated plans for that second phase include 245 apartments, plus restaurants and entertainment venues.

 

http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/10/flats_east_bank_developers_ref.html#incart_river_default

  • Author

Sounds like this loan will jumpstart the next phase. Hope so.

 

EDIT: wait a sec'. Previous reports had 140 apartments in phase 2. Now this is say 225 apartments? Is there a typo here? Or an expansion from prior plans? If an expansion, will it mean a taller apartment building or a second building? Hmmmm.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Sounds like this loan will jumpstart the next phase. Hope so.

 

EDIT: wait a sec'. Previous reports had 140 apartments in phase 2. Now this is say 225 apartments? Is there a typo here? Or an expansion from prior plans? If an expansion, will it mean a taller apartment building or a second building? Hmmmm.

 

Hey KJP -

 

It's 245 apartments, and it's not a typo. That's why I wrote "updated plans." There's space for a lot more (probably 750-1000 units total), but they're going to tackle the residential development one building at a time.

 

Michelle

Wow, that's fantastic- thanks, Michelle for the update!

  • Author

MJM: Thanks! Any word if they are expanding from 140 to 225 vertically or horizontally?

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

That is over 50% more units!  I would imagine they would have to build upward to keep space available for all the other attractions that they want to put down there.

  • Author

That is over 50% more units!  I would imagine they would have to build upward to keep space available for all the other attractions that they want to put down there.

 

If so, then we're looking at a 10- or 11-story building instead of just seven.

 

AuvvEE5CEAAhORZ.jpg:large

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • Author

That could be. They may not want to go higher than seven stories with the riverfront apartment building as it would block views of the water from the hotel and even from the E&Y office building. Guess we'll have to wait and see.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Not only that, but the apartment building is already sort of large and monolithic.  I'd hate to see it be more so.

Two new images posted on FEB facebook

 

 

  • Author

Holy Schmoly!

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

I don't think those are that new. They've been on the flats east website in the phase II section

 

Looks nice though...would love to see  it alive like that

Yes those have been around since last summer. But I wonder why the FEB  Facebook would post those now. And now I am really confused as what is Phase ll. The rendering above depicts the area between the waterfront tracks and the new apartment complex. The site plan released with the Phase ll announcement doesn't show that as part of it. Maybe with the recent story from Michelle stating the increase in the number of apartment units from 140 to 245 has something to do with it. Looks like the area shown above which includes a parking deck could be part of it, although I haven't seen any announcement.

Looking at those renderrings above shows how this could drain other areas of the city (W25th, WHD, E4th) very quickly.  I really wouldn't care if the Flats did not consist of one more restaurant in it's build out.  The ones in the Aloft are good enough by me.  Many more waterside apartments, some general retail (drugstores, bookstores, gadget store etc), is all that I think this are needs to be successful.  Lets face it, 5 years from now, what ever opens up as far as restaurants down there go, will most likely change hands and shed a bad light on the development overall.  I love the development in the flats because it was a mess post 2000, however the mix of tenants is nothing taht I would like to see.  JMHO.  It seems like an E4th stree 12 blocks west...

That's the problem with Cleveland at this point. Every neighborhood is trying to become a place for dining or bars, since other retail is not viable yet. We can only maintain so many dining districts, so new areas will end up hurting older dining areas, or the new dining areas will just fail. I see the same issue with every neighborhood trying to become an arts neighborhood.

HOpefully the convention center attendees will help sustain some of the newer places.

Any surface lot on that site plan is a candidate for another building if this project is successful. I agree it's odd the buildings in the facebook photos aren't in the phase 2 plans, but clearly something changed.

 

That's the problem with Cleveland at this point. Every neighborhood is trying to become a place for dining or bars, since other retail is not viable yet. We can only maintain so many dining districts, so new areas will end up hurting older dining areas, or the new dining areas will just fail. I see the same issue with every neighborhood trying to become an arts neighborhood.

 

It isn't quite the zero-sum game you are making it out to be. Clearly there are more people coming downtown and to Ohio City then back in the 90's. The typical family's entertainment budget has gone up, so the overall pot is bigger despite the lagging economy and lost population. That isn't a Cleveland phenomenon.

 

I agree though the entertainment districts might be growing faster than we can support. Besides FEB, there are new restaurants opening in the Playhouse Square, Uptown, Casino phase II (eventually), and more places in Ohio City south and west of Lorain/W25th. We should hope for population growth in Cleveland, not more transient visitors like tourists and conventioneers.

</soap box>

Lets face it, 5 years from now, what ever opens up as far as restaurants down there go, will most likely change hands and shed a bad light on the development overall.

 

Sure, there is that risk, but then there is also the risk that the next Blue Point, Mallorca, XO, Lola or any other number of downtown institutions will result. In fact, if you compare it to E4th (as you've done) how many of the original restaurants in that street have closed versus non-restaurants?

 

It seems to me that downtowns everywhere are successfully becoming residential, food and entertainment districts in spite of instead of because of the stores. As a resident myself, I find that with Amazon and other internet shopping, the need for a brick and mortar is less and less needed.

^Could you also make the argument that although the population overall in Cleveland has decreased the amount of white collar residents with more spendable income is actually increasing?  Im trying to think of a time since the mid-1900's that the middle to upper income residents were moving TO the city of cleveland.  The reason i mention this is proximity.  While the average well-to-do citizen may have visited the Flats often in its heyday, that was an event for those people.  Now, we are finding people with money doing their every day activities in these neighborhoods (Tremont, Downtown, Gordon Square, OC), its not just a weekend event.

It's actually not all that big a site, as you can see at http://www.powerandlightdistrict.com/index.cfm?page=map

 

But I was actually referring more to the type of big-box entertainment tenants, relatively new urbanist siting paired with an abundance of surface and structured parking and relatively "loud" lighting and signage scheme.

  • Author

^Could you also make the argument that although the population overall in Cleveland has decreased the amount of white collar residents with more spendable income is actually increasing?  Im trying to think of a time since the mid-1900's that the middle to upper income residents were moving TO the city of cleveland.  The reason i mention this is proximity.  While the average well-to-do citizen may have visited the Flats often in its heyday, that was an event for those people.  Now, we are finding people with money doing their every day activities in these neighborhoods (Tremont, Downtown, Gordon Square, OC), its not just a weekend event.

 

That's right. The purchasing power of a neighborhood increases when there are residents having mixed incomes, not just low incomes, and more businesses follow the money into a neighborhood.

 

EDIT: to keep this on topic, I do like neighborhoods with "brands" and specialties. I don't want each urban neighborhood to be like higher-density versions of look-a-like suburban strip malls and power centers where you know what the retail mix will be before you even set foot in it. If that's what Flats East Bank will be, that's not what will get me to come there. In fact, I just realized that I haven't personally patronized any of their businesses yet (except for a business function).

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

It's actually not all that big a site, as you can see at http://www.powerandlightdistrict.com/index.cfm?page=map

 

But I was actually referring more to the type of big-box entertainment tenants, relatively new urbanist siting paired with an abundance of surface and structured parking and relatively "loud" lighting and signage scheme.

 

Agreed.  When I said "half that", I wasn't referring to size either.

Power and Light district is really KC's E 4th, since one of it's main draw is the arena.   

 

I hope the best for the Flats project, but would really like to see it focus on residential and office.  Cleveland doesn't need another restaurant zone.

what I really want to know, now that it has been a few days since Michelle's article (and since KJP did inquire) is where the additional apartments mentioned in the article are going .  I tend to agree with a number of posters that the riverfront building is not going any taller to accomodate the increase...so where?

That's the problem with Cleveland at this point. Every neighborhood is trying to become a place for dining or bars, since other retail is not viable yet. We can only maintain so many dining districts, so new areas will end up hurting older dining areas, or the new dining areas will just fail. I see the same issue with every neighborhood trying to become an arts neighborhood.

 

Bingo!

and yet there are still more areas trying to launch Community Entertainment District overlays....  Detroit Shoreway is about to launch one along Detroit & 65th....  hello, silver bullet?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.