October 24, 200618 yr It took me a few tries to get from Northside to Pleasant Ridge. It does offer options beyond the obvious. Do any of you guys like that system map they have ?
October 24, 200618 yr I had to download the file (save file as...) in order to load it, but yeah, that rocks out...very handy.
November 12, 200618 yr Author Both from the 10/27/06 Enquirer: Judge hears TANK center feud BY MIKE RUTLEDGE | ENQUIRER STAFF WRITER NEWPORT - Can Northern Kentucky's bus system afford to build the estimated $7.9 million transit center it has proposed near Fourth and York streets in Newport? Certainly, the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky argued this week in writing before Campbell Circuit Judge Julie Reinhardt Ward. One way is to boost bus fares by 25 cents, which "would produce an additional $650,000 increase in fare-box revenues," TANK lawyers wrote in their final briefs before Ward is to issue her decision in coming weeks. Click on link for article. http://news.nky.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/AB/20061027/NEWS0103/610270421
November 16, 200618 yr Bus fares may go up Metro asks City Council to approve 25-cent hike BY GREGORY KORTE | November 16, 2006 Metro, the region's bus system, is proposing another 25-cent increase in its base fare in February - potentially setting the stage for round two of a contentious battle with Cincinnati City Council. The fare increase, approved by the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority on Tuesday and announced Wednesday, would be the second fare boost in two years. In 2005, the bus system increased fares to a flat rate of $1, from a three-tiered structure of 50 cents to 80 cents depending on day and time. At $1.25 for in-city travel - and up to $2.50 to or from the suburbs - the cumulative increase since 2004 is as high as 56 percent for weekday, rush-hour travelers. "We had to. There's no way we can get by," said Lamont Taylor, the chairman of the regional transit authority, which runs the bus system formerly known as Queen City Metro. "There's no services we can cut. And if we pushed it off by a year or two, it would make it worse." Read full article here: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061116/NEWS01/611160364/1077/COL02
November 16, 200618 yr Proposed fares The following proposed Metro fares, which reflect the $0.25 increase, would be in effect at all times every day, beginning Sunday, Feb. 4, 2007: Current Proposed Zone 1 (within city of Cincinnati) Regular fare $1 $1.25 Fare Deal (elderly/disabled) 50 cents 60 cents Children (under 5, or 45 inches) 50 cents 60 cents Riverfront Shuttle 50 cents 50 cents Zone 2 (to, from or within Hamilton County) Regular fare $1.50 $1.75 Fare Deal (elderly/disabled) 75 cents 85 cents Children (under 5, or 45 inches) 75 cents 85 cents Zone 3 (to, from or within Clermont County and Harrison) Regular fare $2 $2.25 Fare Deal (elderly/disabled) $1 $1.10 Children (under 5, or 45 inches) $1 $1.10 Premium Express (Butler and Warren Counties) Regular Fare $2.25 $2.50 Fare Deal (elderly/disabled) $1.10 $1.25 Children (under 5, or 45 inches) $1.10 $1.25 Transfer charge Within Metro 25 cents 25 cents From TANK (N.Ky. System) 50 cents 50 cents Metrocard monthly passes "A" pass (Zone 1) $40 $45 "B" pass (Zone 2) $60 $65 "C" pass (Zone 3) $80 $85 "MT" pass (Metro/TANK) $70 $75 "E" pass (Premium Express) $90 $95 Fare Deal sticker $24.50 $29.50
November 16, 200618 yr This isn't terribly surprising given the volatility of the price of gas. The A card is a decent deal but those fares that require dimes & nickels have got to be a headache. I think a lot of people fear the complexities of riding the bus & having to screw around with a bunch of odd rates & having the exact change for them is enough to scare a lot of people off.
November 16, 200618 yr This is going to be a tough sell politically, since they just went through a tough fight a few years ago over fare increases. The buck a ride deal was convenient, but I understand they face tight budgets. Transit in Cincinnati still is relatively cheap, but it isn't the deal it used to be. It'd be nice if these increased fares paid for better service. Shouldn't their extensive use of biodiesel mitigate the volatility of fuel prices?
December 20, 200618 yr TANK investing in hybrid buses to clean up the air JAMES PROFFITT / CINCINNATI POST December 19, 2006 COVINGTON - The Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky will place what it says are the area's first full-sized diesel-electric hybrid buses into service in late 2007, thanks to funding the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet. Monday, the cabinet announced that more than $1.2 million in Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality funds have been designated for Boone, Kenton and Campbell counties. The largest grant, $881,600, is for TANK to put toward four new electric-hybrid buses. Click on link for article. http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061219/NEWS01/612190394
December 21, 200618 yr Another benefit is fuel costs, which typically run 20 percent less than standard diesel engines. And, Aiello points out, the engines are capable of running on biodiesel, a combination of diesel and processed vegetable oils or animal fats. He says that although TANK isn't using any biodiesel now, the bus system would if diesel prices went up enough to warrant switching. Aren't all diesel busses capable of running on biodiesel? I know Metro's busses run on biodiesel (at least during the summer, biodiesel can freeze).
December 21, 200618 yr ^I believe that Metro is actually the largest fleet in the nation that uses biodiesel. As for TANK not switching over until prices go higher...that doesn't seem to make entire sense, but hey at least its a step in the right direction.
December 27, 200618 yr It would seem to be a good indicator with these routes (express bus routes = poor man's version of light-rail) seeing increased ridership, that light-rail might be a good option for the metropolitan area....hmmm More suburbanites ride express buses BY JENNIFER BAKER | [email protected] December 27, 2006 WEST CHESTER TWP. – Long commutes and the lingering memory of a spike in gas prices earlier this year may be convincing more suburbanites to leave their cars at home. The latest figures from Metro reveal that ridership on three suburban express bus routes was up significantly in November, compared to one year ago. Overall, ridership in the city of Cincinnati remains flat while long distance commuter ridership was up 4 percent in November. Read More...
December 27, 200618 yr I would like to see further expansion of the bus system into the northern suburbs. Butler and Warren counties should start paying Metro for more express and crosstown routes. I could see better a crosstown local and express system handling a lot of people from Fairfield over to Mason/Blue Ash area. Along with better downtown express service, ridership would certainly rise. Light rail would be nice too!
December 31, 200618 yr Author From the 11/22/06 Kentucky Post: TANK funds fueled judge's ruling By Paul A. Long Post staff writer For the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky, it was a slim positive in a judicial opinion full of negatives. Campbell Circuit Judge Julie Reinhardt Ward ruled Tuesday that TANK cannot force a Newport family to sell its property near the courthouse for a bus depot. But she also denied the Fennell family's request to make TANK pay the family's legal fees, which so far have amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars. "This court does not believe that there is sufficient evidence that TANK was proceeding with the case in an effort to wear out the respondents," the judge ruled in the latest decision in the long-running dispute. Click on link for article. http://news.cincypost.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061122/NEWS02/611220352/1014/NEWS02
March 14, 200718 yr There are some potential changes that could happen should funding be restructured with Metro. It will be interesting to see what comes out of it (if it happens at all). Some of the changes include: new direct routes, new express routes, new sub-stations for buses as alternative to Gov't Square, and so on. Please post all new changes that are going on with Metro. The most recent change has been asthetic...with new bus designs eqipped with new colors and the new logo. In combination with this the new buses the fleet has added our more usable for those with disabilities. Here is the new design of the mothly passes (effective April 1, 2007): http://www.go-metro.com/pdfs/newpasses.pdf
March 15, 200718 yr rant time While the old cards were not exactly things of beauty, they were very useful. The new ones with reduced contrast and narrower fonts will be harder to read for people with reduced vision. If you are completely blind, of course, it would not matter. This seems to be the logic of Metro. The new buses flat out have fewer seats. What seats exist are scrunched in tighter and are lower. While there are not the 2 steps to get into the bus, the first step is about the same & the mot treacherous. The dark narrow steep steps to get to the upper deck are virtually impossible to use for elderly people or people with mobility impairments. Almost half the seats are, thus, rendered unusable in a bus that has fewer sets anyway. And as I mentioned, the seats are harder to navigate. I recently had to help an elderly guy out of his seat because it was too low. I am about 6'2" and I cannot sit with my knees straight in front of me in these new buses. With the old buses, one had a continuous overhead handrail running rhe length of the bus. In the new buses, one must continually search for hand holds that are placed all over he place. One of my favorite features, here, is the overhead hand rail on the driver side. It does not reach all the way to the last seat. The overhead handrail for the upper deck does extend out past the upper deck & over he last seat of he lower deck. A professional basketball player might be able to use the thing but that is about it. One thing that is not really a design problem per se but is still a real problem that should have been addressed is that teenagers like to stand between the wheelwells. It seems to be some kind of social thing. This makes boarding the bus a real PITA especially considering the obesity of so many teens. Further, the "flat" floor is not flat, it dips just after the wheelwells which is disconcerting to visually impaired people who are expecting a truly flat loor as they grasp about for hand holds here and there about the *@^$ bus. I have not met anyone who likes these buses oh wait, I forgot about the sense of claustrophobia from sittiing in the low seats while the windows are all up above your head...... they do seem to run better, tho.
March 15, 200718 yr ^^I got to ride one of the new buses for the first time today and I REALLY liked it. Yes there were fewer seats, but the layout inside is much nicer in my opinion. I sat near the front where the seats are lower and was easily able to see out of the window (I'm about 6 ft. tall). I LOVED the digital message thing at the front of the bus with the time and route flashing...along with a message whenever someone requested a stop. The ride was smoother...I liked not having to take all those steps to get in (much more welcoming). All in all, I thought that the new bus was great and a vast improvement over the old one. Now granted I don't ride Metro daily so maybe my view is skewed, but that was my experience.
March 15, 200718 yr The newer old buses have the digital display. My biggest complaint is that they seem to care about a very few number of seriously incapacitated disabled people but not the greater number of infirm people. From the pics I have seen of you, you look pretty healthy Well, physically.
March 15, 200718 yr I believe it was one of the new ones...it had the two levels. This was not a newer old bus...it was brand spanking new. I also noticed the rails going the entire length of the bus (except for the door area midway back). From the pics I have seen of you, you look pretty healthy Well, physically. Thanks! And I'm healthy as a horse!
April 2, 200718 yr Sounds like a good move to me! Metro offers UC free rides BY LORI KURTZMAN | April 1, 2007 It's just a stroll up the hill to get to school, but sometimes Brad Johnson doesn't feel like walking. So the University of Cincinnati student drops a dollar on the Metro and lets the bus do the work. Soon, that luxury won't even cost a dollar. This spring, anyone with a valid UC ID - students, faculty and staff - will be able to ride the bus for free. UC and Metro are getting ready to ink a deal that would offer no-cost bus service to 45,000 students and employees at UC's main campus and branches. Some details still need to be hashed out, but under the three-year agreement - which is targeted to begin May 1 - UC would pay Metro $150,000 annually. Half of that would come from the university and the other half from student fees designated for an existing shuttle system that would be modified under the new arrangement. "We're very excited about it," said UC student body president Jerry Tsai, who's been a part of negotiations on the deal. "It's a big, big step." Tsai said students have long been working on ways to get around. Last year, UC launched the Bearcat Transportation System after students agreed to an $8 fee increase for the shuttle service, which runs around campus during the day and branches out farther during weekend nights. The Metro agreement will expand student travel options even more, Johnson said. Read full article here: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070401/NEWS0102/704010346/1058/NEWS01
April 3, 200718 yr Just got my April MetroCard er Pass. It's funny. A clerk at the Credit Union down on Elder & Vine informed me once that they do not sell Metro Passes but they do sell Metro Cards. Now they are passes. Wonder if she will have to be retrained. Something different that I had not noticed is that a pass for zone 1 is a 1 pass where it used to be an A pass. While it makes more sense to stick to one naming convention I am sure it will confuse people. FWIW the lady at the Northside Ohio Check Cashers didn't like the new design either. She couldn't tell the zone 1 cards er passes from the zone 2 passes. Nevermind that they are color coded.....
April 4, 200718 yr The elderly and infirm should love this. Councilman wants to ban bus benches BY JANE PRENDERGAST | [email protected] Those benches at bus stops – the ones that say, “See, You Looked” and advertise $99 wills – could disappear from Cincinnati curbs. Councilman Chris Bortz wants them all gone because they detract from the “general curb appeal of the city.” Council’s economic development committee, of which Bortz is chairman, will start discussing next week his motion to order the Bench Billboard Co. to immediately remove 722 benches allowed by a 1996 ordinance as well as others allowed by another section of the municipal code. Officials at Bench Billboard did not return a phone call seeking a response to Bortz’s idea. Bench, based in Madison Place, is a family-run company in business since 1959, according to its Web site. The site lists testimonials from real estate agents, attorneys and car dealers. Among the local advertisers: McCluskey Chevrolet; Monster.com; and U.S. Rep. Steve Chabot, who has used bench ads in his campaigns. A bench ad in a fixed location costs $35 a week. Read full article here: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070403/NEWS01/304030024
April 4, 200718 yr Ya well everytime I am driving and there is a bus in the vicinity, somehow they always try to run me off the road... Its an intense psychological battle similar to Hannibal Lector and Jodi Foster
April 4, 200718 yr Bortz said he isn’t opposed to letting people sit as they wait for a bus. He just wants them to do it on something “pretty, attractive, sturdy and durable,” something that looks nicer than “two pieces of concrete with a slab.” Well I think that everyone can agree with this notion, but who is going to pony up the money to pay for any benches to replace these...and then pay the extra to make them an attractive addition to the streetscape? Is Bortz and his other conservative bunch going to then propose a spending measure to pay for street furniture across the city?? Not to mention...I think it may end up being a losing battle. I've heard that the billboard industry is one of the toughest to penetrate. Good luck, and should this measure pass through....then I'll be waiting for Bortz, Berding, and Ghiz to push for a new streetscaping spending plan.
April 4, 200718 yr I have verified that the UC - METRO agreement is good on all routes. So once this is up and running UC students, faculty and other employees will be able to ride METRO for free! What a GREAT move, I anticipate this to increase ridership greatly! :clap: :clap: :clap:
April 4, 200718 yr Yes sir, I can't wait. I will stop having to hide a dollar in my wallet so i don't spend it.
April 18, 200718 yr Metro asks 63% raise in Warren bus subsidy Commission to look into its own service BY ELAINE TRUMPEY| April 18, 2007 Warren County commissioners are upset with a contract that proposes a 63 percent increase in the county's subsidy of Metro bus service for commuters to downtown Cincinnati. The commuter service transports 560 people a day. In the proposal, the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority would maintain the same number of trips per day, but increase one-way fares from $2.25 to $2.75. Warren County and its funding partners, Mason and Deerfield Township, would pay $227,600, up from last year's payment of $138,900. Metro CEO Michael Setzer presented three other choices during a work session Tuesday with commissioners. Each would reduce the county's subsidy to SORTA. But each of them cut back on the number of trips to avoid fares beyond $2.75. The cost to ride Metro from Warren County has been $2.25 for two years. The fare was raised to $2.50 earlier this year for commuters in Clermont County and from Harrison in western Hamilton County. Butler County commuters started paying $2.75 per trip on March 4. Read full article here: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070418/NEWS01/704180430/1056/COL02
May 3, 200718 yr UC Students, Faculty, Staff Ride Metro Free A partnership among UC Student Government, university administration, and Metro provides an economical and convenient transportation alternative for the university community BY GREG HAND | April 30, 2007 Beginning Monday, April 30, all 35,000 University of Cincinnati students, and all 10,000 UC faculty and staff can show their UC photo ID cards to ride free on any Metro bus, thanks to funding from the university and UC Student Government. The UC*Metro Program is intended to lessen traffic congestion in the uptown area, free up valuable parking on and near campus and reduce transportation costs for students. The program provides free rides on any Metro route, any time, for all UC students and employees on all UC campuses. The two-year program is funded equally by UC Student Government and UC administration. Student Government will use designated student transportation fees for its portion. The cost to UC is $150,000 each year. During the second year, UC and Metro will negotiate regarding additional years. Read full article here: http://www.uc.edu/news/NR.asp?id=5709
May 3, 200718 yr * Route 17 Seven Hills, Mt. Healthy, Northgate, Mt. Airy, North College Hill, College Hill, Northside * Route 18 Northgate, White Oak, Monfort Heights, Mt. Airy * Route 19 Colerain Ave. corridor from Northgate * Route 24 Anderson Township, Mt. Washington, Mt. Lookout, Hyde Park * Route 31 Evanston, Walnut Hills, West End, Lower Price Hill * Route 39 Western Hills Plaza, Cheviot, Westwood * Route 51 Oakley, Hyde Park, Norwood, Evanston, Avondale * Route 75X Amelia, Cherry Grove, Anderson Township * Route 78 Tri-County, Springdale, Lincoln Heights, Woodlawn, Lockland, Wyoming, Hartwell, Elmwood Place, Bond Hill, St. Bernard Rando, none of these routes do you ny good ? Even augmented with a bicycle ? (yeah, it is a gamble counting on an open bike rack space in mild months)
May 3, 200718 yr Ah if only the 51 were more reliable. Unless you jump out in front of the street right before the 51 approaches you, don't expect the driver to see you. I don't care what you or anyone at metro says, if I'm standing at the edge of the street by the red pole, it's enough to tell a bus driver to stop. I shouldn't have to wave my hand and do jumping jacks. Of course getting passed up makes you an extra hour late for work because you have to wait around for the next one and you happen to get the driver that likes to stop and get Captain Ds on his way through Norwood screwing up the schedule. The schedule is really more of a "suggestion" for drivers than an actual schedule. I will say the 17 is an awesome bus route to take. It runs VERY frequently but its also a very important route so that should be expected.
May 3, 200718 yr keep in mind the 51 does not stop at every stop like the other busses and it stops at some stops none of the other busses stop at as well
May 3, 200718 yr I recently took the 51 to scenic Oakley. Man, that route will give a driver a workout !
May 3, 200718 yr * Route 17 Seven Hills, Mt. Healthy, Northgate, Mt. Airy, North College Hill, College Hill, Northside * Route 18 Northgate, White Oak, Monfort Heights, Mt. Airy * Route 19 Colerain Ave. corridor from Northgate * Route 24 Anderson Township, Mt. Washington, Mt. Lookout, Hyde Park * Route 31 Evanston, Walnut Hills, West End, Lower Price Hill * Route 39 Western Hills Plaza, Cheviot, Westwood * Route 51 Oakley, Hyde Park, Norwood, Evanston, Avondale * Route 75X Amelia, Cherry Grove, Anderson Township * Route 78 Tri-County, Springdale, Lincoln Heights, Woodlawn, Lockland, Wyoming, Hartwell, Elmwood Place, Bond Hill, St. Bernard Rando, none of these routes do you ny good ? Even augmented with a bicycle ? (yeah, it is a gamble counting on an open bike rack space in mild months) I'm sorry, but I have no idea what this is supposed to mean to me. You addressed this comment to me, but it is simply taken directly out of the news release so...?!?!
May 3, 200718 yr ^ http://www.urbanohio.com/forum2/index.php?topic=5574.msg173649#msg173649 You said (about a month ago): "Unfortunately Metro doesn't take me where I need to go on a daily basis (UC's campus)......"
May 8, 200718 yr High cost of gasoline spurs bus ridership in SW Ohio 5/8/2007, 9:18 a.m. EDT The Associated Press CINCINNATI (AP) — Since gasoline topped $3 a gallon, many commuters have left their cars at suburban park-and-ride locations and are taking the bus to work. The number of long-distance commuters taking Metro buses jumped last month, with overall ridership up 8 percent on express routes of 25 miles or more, the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority said Tuesday. One route from the West Chester area north of Cincinnati had a 19 percent increase, compared with April 2006, the bus operator said. Total ridership on express routes reached 36,088 last month. Read More...
May 11, 200718 yr Metro flush with ideas, needs fuel for future plans CEO also concerned about funds for daily operations BY LUCY MAY | May 11, 2007 Since voters rejected a sales tax increase in 2002 to fund expanded bus service and a regional light rail system, there hasn't been much talk about regional public transit. Not much, that is, until Hamilton County Commission President Todd Portune started raising questions about whether Cincinnati's regional transit system was truly regional enough. Earlier this year, he suggested forming a board that includes representatives from Hamilton County as well as Butler, Clermont and Warren counties and has talked about expanding the effort to Northern Kentucky and Southeastern Indiana, too. In the middle of all this sits the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, or SORTA, which operates Metro bus service that is largely funded by a portion of the city of Cincinnati's earnings tax. Former Cincinnati Mayor Roxanne Qualls joined the SORTA board of trustees this year. And while she stressed she does not speak for SORTA, Qualls wants to see the conversation continue. "For the economic competitiveness of Cincinnati and Hamilton County, having a completely built-out transit system that actually gets people across the county is very important," said Qualls, director of Northern Kentucky University's public leadership initiatives. "Where the rub comes is the financing of that system. And other governments are going to have to wrestle with the issue." Read full article here: http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2007/05/14/story8.html
May 11, 200718 yr Metro to ride the berm on I-71 May 11, 2007 | CINCINNATI BUSINESS COURIER Metro said it will be part of an Ohio Department of Transportation pilot program that allows buses to travel on highway shoulders during traffic slowdowns. Mike Setzer, general manager of the transit service, said in an e-mail update that buses on Metro's 71X/72 routes will begin using the inside shoulder on Interstate 71, from north of Kenwood to Kings Island, sometime this summer. The buses will use the shoulder when traffic is slow or stopped in the heavily traveled area. ODOT signs every half-mile will alert motorists that the shoulder is for travel by buses only, and crews will keep the area free of debris. Buses will travel no faster than 35 mph on the berm. Read full article here: http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2007/05/07/daily56.html
June 25, 200717 yr Council rejects bus fare increase BY MARGARET A. MCGURK | June 25, 2007 Cincinnati’s City Council Finance Committee Monday voted to leave Metro bus fare unchanged for now. Metro boss Mike Setzer won only two committee members’ votes – from James Tarbell and Leslie Ghiz – after he presented his case for fare increases to pay for new buses. Committee chair John Cranley questioned Setzer sharply about Metro spending, and suggested that if he cut as rigorously as city departments have done, he would save plenty of money for new buses. Cranley spoke about discussions under way to reshape the way Metro and its governing board function. At least three referred to the need for “a true regional authority” to oversee transit. Metro’s board, called the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA), receives half its operating funds from city earnings taxes. The rest comes chiefly from fares and federal grants. Suburbs outside Hamilton County buy Metro service under contract and do not directly contribute to Metro. Ghiz took issue with Cranley’s suggestion that Metro could save about $1 million a year by turning over its information technology, legal work and public information functions to city departments. Read full article here: http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070625/NEWS01/306250047/1056/COL02
June 25, 200717 yr Cranley spoke about discussions under way to reshape the way Metro and its governing board function. At least three referred to the need for “a true regional authority” to oversee transit. This is something important to remember...I predict some major changes in transportation funding/governing in the somewhat near future.
June 26, 200717 yr Cranley and Setzer should meet in a cage. :-) I do think the funding of Metro should be based more on user fees than government subsidies but I also think the regions served should pay their fair shares of the subsidies. Ghiz' sentiments ring true but it still amazes me that Setzer makes so much more than the city manager. The whole management of SORTA seems extremely top heavy and it should be changed to be more like every other dept of the city.
July 11, 200717 yr Metro to debut pilot ride-on-shoulder project in July July 11, 2007 | CINCINNATI BUSINESS COURIER The ride for commuters on Metro's Kings Island routes will get a little faster beginning July 23. That's the day the bus system will kick off a one-year pilot project that will allow buses to travel on the left shoulder of Interstate 71 under certain conditions. The buses will be able to move to the left shoulder when traffic slows below 35 mph in the often-congested area between Kenwood and Kings Island, Metro said in a news release. Buses will not go more than 15 mph above the speed of highway traffic, or exceed 35 mph. The project is limited to the Route 71X Kings Island Express and the Route 72 Kings Island buses. Read full article here: http://cincinnati.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/stories/2007/07/09/daily25.html
July 12, 200717 yr ^They do this in the Twin Cities and it can make a big difference when traffic is sitting on 35W.
Create an account or sign in to comment