Jump to content

Featured Replies

10 hours ago, ck said:

  I feel like we're not looking at what the opposition actually represents 

I trust that Kay Bea is looking at what the opposition actually represents. She's an architect and professor at OSU, and knowing her, it's comical to imagine the insinuation that she's swayed by Facebook groups or flimsy NIMBY arguments.

I don't know the inner workings of this project, but on the surface it's absolutely awful looking.

  • Replies 514
  • Views 63.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • NorthShore64
    NorthShore64

    Makley Place (10-14-21)       Makley place Condominiums on Forsythe Avenue     Founders Park      

  • NorthShore64
    NorthShore64

    Kind and High (7-17-22)       Makley Place           Founders Park      

  • NorthShore64
    NorthShore64

    King and High (10-23-22)         Makley Place   All but one of the townhome/condo buildings along Forsythe have been completed. 

Posted Images

4 hours ago, zsnyder said:

I trust that Kay Bea is looking at what the opposition actually represents. She's an architect and professor at OSU, and knowing her, it's comical to imagine the insinuation that she's swayed by Facebook groups or flimsy NIMBY arguments.

I don't know the inner workings of this project, but on the surface it's absolutely awful looking.

Why did she even mention them then? She is the one who brought up the 27 letters.

 

*ok I do agree that it is ugly and bulky on the south side of it after looking some more at the CU article pics. Smh this thing has been as problematic as the First/Price behind High one. 

Edited by Toddguy

9 minutes ago, Toddguy said:

 

 ...

Edited by Toddguy

6 hours ago, zsnyder said:

I trust that Kay Bea is looking at what the opposition actually represents. She's an architect and professor at OSU, and knowing her, it's comical to imagine the insinuation that she's swayed by Facebook groups or flimsy NIMBY arguments.

I don't know the inner workings of this project, but on the surface it's absolutely awful looking.

The original project that was presented looked pretty good. They complained about the height and got an ugly rendering in return. The commissions need to stop crying about height and just work on the look of the building. They should have zero say in how tall a building is along high street. 

Is this the same review board that got the Pavey project on the right track? If it is I have to give them a lot of credit for that.

  • 2 weeks later...

Welp, here it is folks. Below are renders of the latest iteration of King & High. 

 

I will say, its not as bad as round 3(?) where it was a blank box but... yup this is about what I was expecting. Architectural hodgepodge because NIMBYism. 

 

Overview

11 stories down to 7 stories, Height will cap at 72' (as zoned)

306 units down to 172 units

 

1948181010_ScreenShot2020-10-16at12_59_58PM.thumb.png.f95880de84d8159e8a69396c9c363dbd.png

 

1530406282_ScreenShot2020-10-16at12_59_51PM.thumb.png.583471e20f67443aeab1a62dc1b30b1c.png

1 hour ago, DevolsDance said:

Welp, here it is folks. Below are renders of the latest iteration of King & High. 

 

I will say, its not as bad as round 3(?) where it was a blank box but... yup this is about what I was expecting. Architectural hodgepodge because NIMBYism. 

 

Overview

11 stories down to 7 stories, Height will cap at 72' (as zoned)

306 units down to 172 units

 

 

1948181010_ScreenShot2020-10-16at12_59_58PM.thumb.png.f95880de84d8159e8a69396c9c363dbd.png

 

1530406282_ScreenShot2020-10-16at12_59_51PM.thumb.png.583471e20f67443aeab1a62dc1b30b1c.png

This design isn’t horrible, and 7 is better than 5, but yeah, nothing great. 

What did they do to those rowhouses?!?!!

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

It is ugly! lol

25 minutes ago, ColDayMan said:

What did they do to those rowhouses?!?!!

Didn’t notice that until just now. That alone makes this horrible.

Goodness, it gets worse with every proposal. I'll admit I sort of like the colors and general design better, but the way the tallest parts come right up over the old facades on High looks way worse than the older proposal. Plus, RIP the townhouses on King. It doesn't look horrible, but they need to just accept the proposal and be done with it at this point.

 

  • 2 weeks later...

Founders Park (Fri. 10-30-20)

09DJv1.jpg

 

09D9EK.jpg

 

09DQ5c.jpg

 

09D6Ax.jpg

 

09DEDk.jpg

 

09DTse.jpg

 

09DRZa.jpg

 

09DtcQ.jpg

 

09DrOM.jpg

 

09DgEA.jpg

 

09DI5q.jpg

 

Former Elementary Site / Vision Development 

09DzHz.jpg

 

09DlE5.jpg

 

09DOGC.jpg

 

09D7vv.jpg

 

Michigan Avenue Infill 

09Dmgm.jpg

 

09DqcP.jpg

 

The new Saucy Brew Works at Michigan and 3rd

09D3Do.jpg

 

09Ds3i.jpg

 

09DdHZ.jpg

  • 3 months later...

 

On 1/11/2021 at 3:10 PM, NorthShore647 said:

Founders Park (Fri. 1-8-21)

0fsPUT.jpg

 

0fsN7z.jpg

 

0fsDR5.jpg

 

(note the new med center crane just to the left of Battelle)

0fsMQ2.jpg

 

0fsYev.jpg

 

0fsL89.jpg

 

0fsnoo.jpg

 

Makley Place (Former Elementary Site / Vision Development)

0fsemi.jpg

 

0fsH7Z.jpg

 

0fsORK.jpg

 

Founders Park (Wed. 2-10-21)

IAVZKi.jpg

 

IAVItm.jpg

 

IAQo4r.jpg

 

IAQuNF.jpg

 

IAQNi3.jpg

 

IAQ5Pk.jpg

 

IAV8ac.jpg

 

IAVizZ.jpg

 

IAVW6K.jpg

 

Makley Place (Former Elementary Site / Vision Development)

IAVgPo.jpg

 

IAVtj9.jpg

 

IAV1q2.jpg

 

IAVRMv.jpg

 

IAVQtb.jpg

 

IAVCwT.jpg

 

IAVVK7.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

King & High Update

It's looks like we have yet another design for the commission this month.

 

Not the worst version we have seen but not the best. I have to say, I prefer this treatment of the townhomes along King over some past iterations but yea, thats about it. I think it's all just kind of a watered down box again. Personally, the UARB has really just been ridiculous with this project. 

 

Anyway, enjoy!

 

932868790_ScreenShot2021-02-20at10_48_44PM.thumb.png.9a9a6f491089db9a2aa0c1b68c546506.png

 

1156378297_ScreenShot2021-02-21at11_53_32AM.thumb.png.b0b822ca2d7a8eea0cd5cd111e3dd44f.png

 

978187268_ScreenShot2021-02-20at10_49_01PM.thumb.png.ad4f882f085089f7aa77a83ca03a7189.png

 

 

25 minutes ago, DevolsDance said:

King & High Update

It's looks like we have yet another design for the commission this month.

 

Not the worst version we have seen but not the best. I have to say, I prefer this treatment of the townhomes along King over some past iterations but yea, thats about it. 

 

Agreed. I actually really like this latest version specifically because of the way it integrates the existing buildings. Hopefully it gets the green light - this poor proposal has definitely been through the ringer. 

1 hour ago, DevolsDance said:

King & High Update

It's looks like we have yet another design for the commission this month.

 

Not the worst version we have seen but not the best. I have to say, I prefer this treatment of the townhomes along King over some past iterations but yea, thats about it. I think it's all just kind of a watered down box again. Personally, the UARB has really just been ridiculous with this project. 

 

Anyway, enjoy!

 

932868790_ScreenShot2021-02-20at10_48_44PM.thumb.png.9a9a6f491089db9a2aa0c1b68c546506.png

 

1156378297_ScreenShot2021-02-21at11_53_32AM.thumb.png.b0b822ca2d7a8eea0cd5cd111e3dd44f.png

 

978187268_ScreenShot2021-02-20at10_49_01PM.thumb.png.ad4f882f085089f7aa77a83ca03a7189.png

 

 

It’s not great, but not horrible. 7 stories is a shame for that corner and I would agree the UARB has ruined this. 

  • 1 month later...

I stumbled upon this project and hadn't seen it mentioned here.  Back in September, there was a proposal for 875 Michigan Avenue from Lykens to convert the existing building from offices to 27 apartments.  Additionally, a new 28-unit apartment building would be built behind it.  I haven't been able to find any renderings yet.  Apparently, this project was approved today.  It was in today's city commission agenda. https://www.columbus.gov/bzs/zoning/Development-Commission/

 

The current 1920s building that would be renovated and the lot that would contain the new building.

 

875michigan1.jpg

875michigan2.jpg

Edited by jonoh81

The former elementary school redevelopment by Vision on 5th had been previously been posted about in the Harrison West Thread. I had been following up with development photos there. It is north of 5th though, so it probably should be in the University Area / District thread. 

 

Makley Place Apartments (4-12-21)

ILPrlD.jpg

 

ILPIa3.jpg

 

ILPANb.jpg

 

Makley Place Condominiums 

ILPg60.jpg

 

ILP0LF.jpg

 

ILP84T.jpg

Founders Park (4-12-21)

ILPT4M.jpg

 

ILPRtA.jpg

 

ILPtbq.jpg

 

A section of land between the Olentangy Trail and River had been cleared of undergrowth and multiple trees earlier this year. It should be a little easier to see the river, even when the leaves come back. 

ILPEPQ.jpg

 

ILP6ia.jpg

40 minutes ago, NorthShore647 said:

The former elementary school redevelopment by Vision on 5th had been previously been posted about in the Harrison West Thread. I had been following up with development photos there. It is north of 5th though, so it probably should be in the University Area / District thread. 

 

Makley Place Apartments (4-12-21)

ILPrlD.jpg

 

ILPIa3.jpg

 

ILPANb.jpg

 

Makley Place Condominiums 

ILPg60.jpg

 

ILP0LF.jpg

 

ILP84T.jpg

 

The site administrators revised this thread to include Dennison Place neighborhood projects north 5th Avenue with the Harrison West neighborhood posts.  So you're fine with continuing to post about the Makley Place former elementary school redevelopment here.

 

And thank you once again for these wonderful updates!

  • 2 weeks later...

King & High development narrows in on new design

Tristan Navera - Columbus Business First - Apr. 25, 2021

 

"Subtext Principal Brandt Stiles told University Impact District Review Board Thursday that the company hopes to see a vote for the project in May. ... Over the course of about 10 major redesigns, the structure has seen its tower range from a thin 11-story portion to a shorter, broader structure that covers much of the city block."

 

 

Here are a few graphics from the Apr. 22, 2021 UIDRB meeting:

Ic3OrP.png

 

Ic3pbZ.png

 

Ic3KlK.png

 

Ic34kc.png

10 hours ago, NorthShore647 said:

King & High development narrows in on new design

Tristan Navera - Columbus Business First - Apr. 25, 2021

 

"Subtext Principal Brandt Stiles told University Impact District Review Board Thursday that the company hopes to see a vote for the project in May. ... Over the course of about 10 major redesigns, the structure has seen its tower range from a thin 11-story portion to a shorter, broader structure that covers much of the city block."

 

 

Here are a few graphics from the Apr. 22, 2021 UIDRB meeting:

Ic3OrP.png

 

Ic3pbZ.png

 

Ic3KlK.png

 

Ic34kc.png

"Art Attack" - I feel like this is commentary on their process thus far

They are specifically responding to neighborhood design requests (which is a slippery slope) but it's generally come a long way. Still not sure why every building has to have 8 different materials and pretend like it's not a massive building... It'd be nicer if they two black boxes at street level responded more to the historic masonry of any of the adjacent structures or incorporated facade, at least in their detailing if not in color

  • 2 weeks later...

Founders Park (5-5-21)

CLB-5-5-21-45.jpg

 

CLB-5-5-21-47.jpg

 

CLB-5-5-21-49.jpg

 

CLB-5-5-21-52.jpg

 

CLB-5-5-21-43.jpg

 

The hotel in the Founders Park, Hyatt House Columbus/OSU-Short North, will be opening at the end of July. 

CLB-5-5-21-48.jpg

 

Makley Place Apartments

CLB-5-5-21-1.jpg

 

Michigan Avenue Infill

CLB-5-5-21-38.jpg

 

CLB-5-5-21-37.jpg

 

2nd Avenue Infill

CLB-5-5-21-36.jpg

Founders Park just absolutely blows my mind, watching a city blossom is so damn cool.

Don’t think this has been posted about yet. 
 

“Apartments Planned for Historic Building that Tells the Story of a Neighborhood

The new plan for the site calls for renovating the existing building to accommodate 27 apartments, while a new, 28-unit building will be constructed behind it. The new building will be three stories tall and contain a parking garage (a total of 61 spaces will be provide for both buildings).

 

https://www.columbusunderground.com/renovation-new-build-planned-for-harrison-west-bw1?fbclid=IwAR0TuG4GWEzM-FGkfobvb04cTSVInoGCbeLJqmyFroVDnBaPl4NjXCvXxcs

RE: King and High development.

From the Columbus Landmarks Facebook page:

Quote

Free to a Good Home!

This charming historic service station is being offered for free to anyone who has an appropriate available site and a creative vision for the adaptive reuse of an endangered building. Artist Studio? Coffee shop? Bakery? Bar? Garden shed? GARAGE?!

Built in 1925, this little gem sits in the way of the proposed redevelopment of the King & High block that was featured on our 2019 Most Endangered Sites list. The developer will pay to move the building if a nearby site is found.

This is a prime opportunity to recycle an entire building for a creative new purpose. It presents an opportunity to give the community a visible connection to the past while adding authentic visual character to a neighborhood. But action must be taken soon!

If you are interested, we encourage you to go see the building today. Then, if you have an available site, email Susan Keeny, Preservation Director, at [email protected] or call us at 614-221-4508. Please hurry!

 

image.png.52574279e319f92a8b349a652740b1ce.png

Edited by Pablo

48 minutes ago, Pablo said:

RE: King and High development.

From the Columbus Landmarks Facebook page:

 

image.png.52574279e319f92a8b349a652740b1ce.png

Would be kinda cool to see a bar or coffee house ran out of it. But, aside from being old, is there anything architecturally of value this building offers? Not being sarcastic, just wondering. 

Move THAT building? Oh wow....

On 5/11/2021 at 2:53 PM, Pablo said:

RE: King and High development.

From the Columbus Landmarks Facebook page:

 

image.png.52574279e319f92a8b349a652740b1ce.png

For years I have thought that a bbq joint would operate perfectly in this building. 

^I like the building. There are several repurposed old gas stations around. I guess moving it is possible otherwise the developer wouldn't have offered it up. It's a goodwill gesture for sure.

Surprised Katalina's hasn't stepped in.

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

On 5/11/2021 at 2:53 PM, Pablo said:

RE: King and High development.

From the Columbus Landmarks Facebook page:

 

image.png.52574279e319f92a8b349a652740b1ce.png

Columbus Landmarks posted this on their Instagram and the Kelley Companies said they are interested. They have done some cool renovations for historic buildings and I feel like they would be able to pull this off.

  • 1 month later...

Founders Park (7-3-21)

CLB-7-3-21-99.jpg

 

CLB-7-3-21-102.jpg

 

CLB-7-3-21-100.jpg

 

CLB-7-3-21-1.jpg

 

Makley Place Apartments

CLB-7-3-21-97.jpg

 

CLB-7-3-21-96.jpg

 

CLB-7-3-21-95.jpg

When I was in Columbus in May I was truly struck by just how massive the Founders Park development is. The fact that the hotel portion comes right up to 315 was interesting to see. While not the best laid out project in Columbus, its presence is definitely felt and I feel it should contribute to the overall streetscape along this area of West 5th. 

How they got away with putting the parking lot in front of the hotel and not behind will forever baffle me. Absolute miss in my opinion. 

On 7/13/2021 at 4:13 PM, NightNectar said:

How they got away with putting the parking lot in front of the hotel and not behind will forever baffle me. Absolute miss in my opinion. 

 

I disagree only because it's probably going to be a valet only hotel, which would cause a mess on 5th.

On 7/13/2021 at 4:13 PM, NightNectar said:

How they got away with putting the parking lot in front of the hotel and not behind will forever baffle me. Absolute miss in my opinion. 

It would not be as bad if they put some $$$ into some more mature trees and landscaping in the front.  It looks like that will not be the case. Something like what they started off with landscaping wise along Gay in Neighborhood Launch can really help new development. But I guess they don't want to spend the $$$ for that.

Edited by Toddguy

On 7/14/2021 at 9:59 PM, wpcc88 said:

 

I disagree only because it's probably going to be a valet only hotel, which would cause a mess on 5th.

Personally I do not see a Hyatt House being Valet Only - especially with a lot as large as this - so I would be surprised if that is the case here. Time will tell!

4 hours ago, NightNectar said:

Personally I do not see a Hyatt House being Valet Only - especially with a lot as large as this - so I would be surprised if that is the case here. Time will tell!

 

I've seen it before, trust me.  

18 hours ago, wpcc88 said:

 

I've seen it before, trust me.  

Since it is almost open I decided to check Hyatt.com - Parking is free as expected with a lot this large.

 

It looks to be a very nice hotel for the area.

Screen Shot 2021-07-20 at 9.19.30 AM.png

King and High Project Approved After Two-Year Process

 

A plan to redevelop the southwest corner of King Avenue and North High Street was approved last night by the University Impact Review Board (UIDRB).

 

The approval comes after a long and at times contentious process in which the development team floated many different concepts and design iterations for the prominent corner.

 

Subtext, the St. Louis-based developer leading the project, brought its initial ideas for the one-acre site to the zoning committee of the University Area Commission in the spring of 2019 (at the time, the company was called Collegiate Development Group).

 

More below:

https://www.columbusunderground.com/king-and-high-project-approved-after-two-year-process-bw1/

 

King-and-High-July-21-1-1150x550.jpg

 

King-and-High-July-21-3-620x345.jpg

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

13 hours ago, ColDayMan said:

King and High Project Approved After Two-Year Process

 

A plan to redevelop the southwest corner of King Avenue and North High Street was approved last night by the University Impact Review Board (UIDRB).

 

The approval comes after a long and at times contentious process in which the development team floated many different concepts and design iterations for the prominent corner.

 

Subtext, the St. Louis-based developer leading the project, brought its initial ideas for the one-acre site to the zoning committee of the University Area Commission in the spring of 2019 (at the time, the company was called Collegiate Development Group).

 

More below:

https://www.columbusunderground.com/king-and-high-project-approved-after-two-year-process-bw1/

 

King-and-High-July-21-1-1150x550.jpg

 

King-and-High-July-21-3-620x345.jpg

My only question is what is going on with the lower buildings on the far right of the first pic?  What in the world is that covering on the lower 2 floors? I can't figure it out?  I am glad they are saving the facade of the corner building and hopefully moving the little gas station(would make a great diner somewhere). It looks decent from the alley also.

Those appear to be the original buildings painted black and the porch roofs removed. Just a bad image from from software.

 

 

Screenshot_20210725-121906_Maps.jpg

Screenshot_20210725-121939_Maps.jpg

Edited by DTCL11

45 minutes ago, DTCL11 said:

Those appear to be the original buildings painted black and the porch roofs removed. Just a bad image from from software.

 

 

Screenshot_20210725-121906_Maps.jpg

Screenshot_20210725-121939_Maps.jpg

OK thanks for clearing that up. Interesting that there are no balconies, but it appears that the rear end facing the alley will have some activated roots given the greenery shown(and if that is part of the plan they should be made to stick with it).  I wonder how many beds there will be total in the 153 units? It does not look that bad at all to me and I like the way they have done the massing towards the back.  It would have been nice if they had balconies or something for some of the units on the strip of the corner building roof whose facade is being saved.

  • 1 month later...

Apparently the Hyatt House opened about a month ago??

 

CBF has a little write up and some pictures. Sounds like a pretty neat place to stay!

 

“Located off the Olentangy Trail, the hotel features a gym full of equipment made by Columbus-based Rogue Fitness. Some guest rooms also feature private Peloton bikes, and there are bike rentals available to take advantage of the proximity to the trail.

 

The hotel also has a full-service bar, called H Bar, featuring local spirits and beers. There also is an outdoor fire pit, bocce ball court, an indoor pool and a dog courtyard.”

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2021/08/31/new-hyatt-house-opens-harrison-west.html?utm_source=st&utm_medium=en&utm_campaign=me&utm_content=co&ana=e_co_me&j=24904506&senddate=2021-08-31

  • 5 weeks later...

Project Update: Founders Park in Harrison West

 

Although there is still plenty of work to be done before the 21-acre development is complete, a new hotel and the first phase of apartments are now open at Founders Park.

 

The site occupies a piece of land along the Olentangy River that was once a Battelle parking lot, between Third and Fifth Avenues. It is being developed by Thrive Companies (formerly Wagenbrenner Development), along with Continental Real Estate, Fortress Real Estate Companies, Daimler Group and M/I Homes.

 

The northern edge of the development is the farthest along – a new Hyatt House hotel opened at 633 W. Fifth Ave. in late July, and the first 42 apartments in the project, which overlook Fifth Avenue, are now 100 percent occupied.

 

More below:

https://www.columbusunderground.com/project-update-founders-park-in-harrison-west-bw1/

 

Founders-Park-9-21-5-620x349.jpg

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

  • 3 weeks later...

Makley Place (10-14-21)

1540458426_CLB_10-14-21(96).thumb.jpg.bd163fec8c9bcef29c0b21b36eb5ccbf.jpg

 

410735690_CLB_10-14-21(95).thumb.jpg.d6bda00d8d2192af0cf4e831ce04c19f.jpg

 

731854122_CLB_10-14-21(93).thumb.jpg.c3615504cc696c3099be0b5db91353d0.jpg

 

Makley place Condominiums on Forsythe Avenue

336434778_CLB_10-14-21(94).thumb.jpg.0df0e14d6468efa849e869ea857cef10.jpg

 

1339705289_CLB_10-14-21(91).thumb.jpg.9601c10566f48d77ddc63c014de89ce8.jpg

 

Founders Park

510599849_CLB_10-14-21(107).thumb.jpg.d2c2bc70d333c63e590ba8d0a9ffd50a.jpg

 

90604058_CLB_10-14-21(106).thumb.jpg.dbf7b76fa1a2b98ce6a4eaceb33f7399.jpg

 

1779129186_CLB_10-14-21(103).thumb.jpg.8be556a197d31e19d0db312d8b005099.jpg

 

198440646_CLB_10-14-21(104).thumb.jpg.02a8f54639151d006f51c4d5a19b7106.jpg

 

140226167_CLB_10-14-21(100).thumb.jpg.d9362e647ebd6e19cc323e6174c7fbf9.jpg

 

90725829_CLB_10-14-21(98).thumb.jpg.101adef1c5852d3eb899c35fbd946cd9.jpg

 

 

 

  • 2 weeks later...

80F62D11-BD5E-49FF-8560-6F1066DDC3D8.thumb.jpeg.ce233fb7a7bc11629c0dfc26aa989719.jpegWondering if anyone knows anything about this project and why it was abandoned? It’s on the corner of Michigan and Buttles in the Harrison Place area. It looks like it’s been abandoned at least a year or two, so my guess is maybe it had something to do with covid? 

2 hours ago, amped91 said:

80F62D11-BD5E-49FF-8560-6F1066DDC3D8.thumb.jpeg.ce233fb7a7bc11629c0dfc26aa989719.jpegWondering if anyone knows anything about this project and why it was abandoned? It’s on the corner of Michigan and Buttles in the Harrison Place area. It looks like it’s been abandoned at least a year or two, so my guess is maybe it had something to do with covid? 

 

I asked this same question back in April 2019:

 

On 4/4/2019 at 2:24 PM, Columbo said:

CU has a photo of this project - http://www.columbusunderground.com/four-story-building-to-bring-more-new-apartments-to-harrison-west-bw1 - at the northwest corner of Michigan and Buttles (840 Michigan Avenue) just to the north of the 140-unit Trotters Park apartment development completed in 2015.  Photo from the CU construction update at https://www.columbusunderground.com/construction-roundup-short-north-university-district

cons-mar-2019-34.jpg

 

Unfortunately that's not good news.  This construction project has been stalled since Summer 2017 (check out the google streetviews from August 2017 and July 2018.  And UO posters have noticed the lack of progress over the past two years:

 

And that was after other UO posters asked the same question in 2017 and 2018(!)

 

On 4/4/2019 at 2:24 PM, Columbo said:

On 7/31/2017 at 5:35 PM, wpcc88 said:

This project has been shuttered all summer, anyone know what happened?  The stairwells and elevator shaft are both complete or near completion too,  just plain weird.

 

On 12/27/2018 at 9:28 AM, aderwent said:

This is still just sitting. Some framing done for the retail spot. Looks like the owner (SWAC IV LLC) is delinquent on their property tax, too...

 

Now its even got a reddit post:  https://www.reddit.com/r/Columbus/comments/b84nvi/abandoned_development_in_harrison_west/

"Posted by funkymoses17 - 3 days ago - Abandoned Development in Harrison West

Does anyone have any information on the abandoned development on the corner of Thurber and Buttles in Harrison West. They started construction on it 2 years ago and then abandoned it after awhile. They occasionally will cut the grass (after waiting entirely too long each time) and have stashed construction equipment on the site before but it's a huge eye sore and is just surrounded by temporary fencing."

 

tlb919 gave this reply on reddit, but I wonder if anyone else has any updates?

"tlb919 - 3 days ago

It's actually Mulberry who is developing it. It was originally supposed to be an "extended stay hotel" aka apartments using a zoning loophole. Either way, I believe I read they halted due to a change in how they wanted to build the site and while its tied up in approvals they are focusing their resources on building out the silver of land they have in Jeffrey Park first."

 

Despite some posters thinking that the project was on the verge of restarting, it never did.  So, the developer/property owner running out of money or going out of business seems a likely possibility.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.