Jump to content

Featured Replies

^"The Chamber says the site is closest to meeting Amazon's requirements, including it's close proximity to Cleveland and Pittsburgh."

 

....except its neither Cleveland nor Pittsburgh. I though Amazon wanted to be in a city...

 

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Views 150.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • freefourur
    freefourur

    Good news for Northeast Ohio.    Ford to build electric vehicle at Ohio Assembly Plant in Lorain County, invest $1.5 billion in plant   https://www.cleveland.com/business/2022/06

  • We need job and population growth in the state and more diversity of jobs and talent in the state. I would not intentionally scare off people who earnestly inquire about the state. We're getting redde

  • Meanwhile...  

Posted Images

I think Akron's innerbelt works better than the boonies of Trumbull county, if they are wanting to be "out of the way" yet still have an urbanness.  Akron has the CVSR and the towpath coming into downtown plus another bike path coming from the East to be finished soon. So Akron could meet a lot of their goals by being walkable and bike-able.

The Midwest: Inferiority Complex And Economic Decline

 

By Pete Saunders

 

...

 

The Midwest did not develop as organically as the East Coast did, or even as any other U.S. region did, for that matter.  Without question, the South developed through its expansion of the slave and plantation economy -- later discredited and overthrown by the Civil War, but critical to its growth nonetheless.  The vast distances of the West made its connections to other regions more tenuous, but it led to a "destination" feeling to it; you can't have a "from sea to shining sea" mantra without a shining sea ending.  The West became more independent as a result.

 

Meanwhile, the Midwest was tied to the East Coast cities that would always perform the senior partner role.  New England settlers founded many of the region's cities and towns.  East Coast banks funded land acquisitions and railroads.  Financiers invested the money to establish the Midwest's agricultural economy and the manufacturing economy that followed it.

 

Midwesterners have been following the East Coast's lead for 200 years, and we've developed an inferiority complex as a result.

 

...

 

more: https://www.forbes.com/sites/petesaunders1/2017/09/30/the-midwest-inferiority-complex-and-economic-decline/#72787ce873d5

 

What do you guys think of the part I quoted? I had never really considered that before. Interesting article on the whole, they interview Richey Piiparinen at CSU.

^ there's a typo in the third paragraph....should I keep reading? I'm getting a distinct provoke the reader vibe already lol

I figure this CityLab article about "underdogs" trying to win the Amazon HQ belonged here, because it included a nice section about Dayton (and Nan Whaley by extension, who is clearly pushing hard to get her name out there for the governor's race):

 

[...] That’s not to mention the potentially extreme tax incentives cities are offering up as barter. Often, the impetus for the breaks comes at the state level, but their impacts could be disastrous, especially on the smallest of cities. The mayor of Dayton, Nan Whaley, says she doesn’t plan on capitulating to that section of the RFP.

 

But she does see other benefits for Dayton. She hopes that the process might compel transportation improvements within and between the two cities. “Right now with transit, because of the way the state funds it, each community has their own transit system. This opens the door to say ‘does that make the most sense for Southwest Ohio?’” she says. “If you live in Dayton and you don’t have a car, and you have a job in Cincinnati, you’d have to go through three transit systems to get to Cincinnati. And that’s not doable.“ Making their cities more hospitable for Amazon might also translate into making them more hospitable, period.

 

The rest of the article is below:

 

https://www.citylab.com/life/2017/10/the-underdogs-bidding-on-amazon-hq2/541446/

“To an Ohio resident - wherever he lives - some other part of his state seems unreal.”

So there are buses going from Dayton to Cincinnati?

So there are buses going from Dayton to Cincinnati?

 

Yes.  Greyhound buses. 

^ there's a typo in the third paragraph....should I keep reading? I'm getting a distinct provoke the reader vibe already lol

 

What's the typo? This article didn't upset me at all, I thought it was just an honest analysis of something we all know is true.

^ "Midwest" in the sentence below should be "cities:"

 

"Certainly Cleveland exhibits it, Detroit does, and many other Midwest do as well, both large and small."

Ram, trying to steal my job as editor!

 

I saw they singled out Toledo. We could just as easily write an article wondering why, even with all their east coast advantages, Newark, Trenton, Camden, Hartford etc are underperforming.

 

Anyhow, after growing up right between Philly and NYC I'll say that it's Philly that has the real inferiority complex.

 

Edit - had my own typo lol

Oh, I thought you meant the third paragraph that I quoted. I didn't even think to check the third paragraph of the actual article, haha.

 

Anyways, the article doesn't say that no cities on the east coast are under performing, and it also doesn't say that there are no other cities with inferiority complexes other than midwestern ones. It addresses the midwestern inferiority complex, which exists and we shouldn't try to pretend it doesn't.

Ok, I'll read the rest of it.

So there are buses going from Dayton to Cincinnati?

 

Yes.  Greyhound buses. 

 

No, the buses go from suburban Trotwood to Cincinnati. Trotwood is a 45-minute GDRTA bus ride from central Dayton.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • 3 weeks later...

Originally Published: October 20, 2017 9:05 AM Updated: 8 days ago

Ohio added 10,500 jobs in September; unemployment rate falls to 5.3%

By Scott Suttell

 

Ohio added 10,500 jobs in September, and the state's unemployment rate fell to 5.3% from 5.4% in August, according to data issued Friday morning, Oct. 20.

 

The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services reported that the state's nonagricultural wage and salary employment rose to 5,557,000 last month from a revised 5,546,500 in August.

 

The number of workers unemployed in Ohio in September was 305,000, down 6,000 from 311,000 in August, according to the state data.

 

In the past 12 months, though, the number of unemployed in Ohio has increased by 21,000, from 284,000 in September 2016, when the state's unemployment rate was 5%.

 

Ohio's current jobless rate of 5.3% is more than one percentage point higher than the national rate, which was 4.2% in September. In September 2016, the national unemployment rate was 4.9%, virtually the same as the national rate.

 

http://www.crainscleveland.com/article/20171020/news/139441/ohio-added-10500-jobs-september-unemployment-rate-falls-53

  • 2 months later...

State and MSA Employment Summaries, November 2016 to November 2017

 

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Employment Summary, November 2016 to November 2017:

01. Dallas/Fort Worth MSA: + 100,400

02. New York MSA: + 89,300

03. Boston MSA: + 60,300

04. Atlanta MSA: + 56,000

05. Miami/Fort Lauderdale MSA: + 52,200

06. Los Angeles MSA: + 50,700

07. Washington, D.C. MSA: + 48,900

08. Houston MSA: + 48,500

09. Seattle MSA: + 47,900

10. Riverside/San Bernardino MSA: + 46,800

11. Phoenix MSA: + 45,200

12. Minneapolis/Saint Paul MSA: + 41,600

13. San Francisco/Oakland MSA: + 40,200

14. Orlando MSA: + 38,800

15. Detroit MSA: + 34,000

16. San Antonio MSA: + 31,200

17. Tampa MSA: + 30,600

18. Philadelphia MSA: + 30,000

19. Austin MSA: + 27,800

20. Chicago MSA: + 25,900

21. Las Vegas MSA: + 25,200

22. Nashville MSA: + 25,100

23. Denver MSA: + 23,300

24. Portland MSA: + 21,400

25. San Diego MSA: + 20,800

26. Cincinnati MSA: + 20,200

27. Charlotte MSA: + 20,100

28. San Jose MSA: + 20,000

29. Raleigh MSA: + 19,600

30. Salt Lake City MSA: + 19,200

31. Jacksonville MSA: + 18,800

32. Sacramento MSA: + 18,200

33. Indianapolis MSA: + 18,000

34. Baltimore MSA: + 17,600

35. Pittsburgh MSA: + 16,500

36. Louisville MSA: + 14,000

37. Grand Rapids MSA: + 13,700

38. Kansas City MSA: + 13,000

39. Saint Louis MSA: + 11,300

40. Oklahoma City MSA: + 9,900

41. Boise MSA: + 9,800

42. Richmond MSA: + 9,700

43. Des Moines MSA: + 9,300

44. Columbus MSA: + 9,000

45. Omaha MSA: + 8,900

46. Madison MSA: + 8,800

47. El Paso MSA: + 8,300

48. Baton Rouge MSA: + 7,700

49. Chattanooga MSA: + 7,700

50. Harrisburg MSA: + 7,500

51. Tulsa MSA: + 7,200

52. Charleston, S.C. MSA: + 7,000

53. Huntsville MSA: + 6,200

54. Milwaukee MSA: + 6,200

55. Honolulu MSA: + 6,000

56. McAllen MSA: + 5,800

57. Providence MSA: + 5,800

58. Fresno MSA: + 5,700

59. Greenville MSA: + 5,100

60. Memphis MSA: + 5,000

61. Cleveland MSA: + 4,300

62. Syracuse MSA: + 4,100

63. Bakersfield MSA: + 3,700

64. Colorado Springs MSA: + 3,300

65. Albany MSA: + 3,100

66. Albuquerque MSA: + 3,000

67. Bridgeport MSA: + 2,600

68. Columbia MSA: + 2,500

69. Spokane MSA: + 2,400

70. Little Rock MSA: + 1,900

71. Allentown MSA: + 1,800

72. Greensboro MSA: + 1,800

73. Reno MSA: + 1,800

74. Knoxville MSA: + 1,700

75. New Haven: + 1,700

76. Birmingham MSA: + 1,400

77. Buffalo MSA: + 600

78. Lexington MSA: + 500

79. Hartford MSA: +/- 0

80. Cape Coral/Fort Myers MSA: -300

81. Mobile MSA: -700

82. New Orleans MSA: -2,200

83. Tucson MSA: -2,600

84. Rochester MSA: -3,000

85. Virginia Beach/Norfolk MSA: -6,000

86. San Juan MSA: -29,800

01. Dallas/Fort Worth MSA: + 100,400

02. New York MSA: + 89,300

 

Wow, that's crazy. Dallas is pretty miserable place. That they would outpace NY is mindboggling.

01. Dallas/Fort Worth MSA: + 100,400

02. New York MSA: + 89,300

03. Boston MSA: + 60,300

04. Atlanta MSA: + 56,000

05. Miami/Fort Lauderdale MSA: + 52,200

06. Los Angeles MSA: + 50,700

07. Washington, D.C. MSA: + 48,900

08. Houston MSA: + 48,500

09. Seattle MSA: + 47,900

10. Riverside/San Bernardino MSA: + 46,800

11. Phoenix MSA: + 45,200

12. Minneapolis/Saint Paul MSA: + 41,600

13. San Francisco/Oakland MSA: + 40,200

14. Orlando MSA: + 38,800

15. Detroit MSA: + 34,000

16. San Antonio MSA: + 31,200

17. Tampa MSA: + 30,600

18. Philadelphia MSA: + 30,000

19. Austin MSA: + 27,800

20. Chicago MSA: + 25,900

 

 

Wow, that's crazy. Dallas is pretty miserable place. That they would outpace NY is mindboggling.

 

Detroit's metro seems to be doing better too; more jobs that Chicago, and not far behind SFO.

 

 

State and MSA Employment Summaries, November 2016 to November 2017

 

Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Employment Summary, November 2016 to November 2017:

 

24. Portland MSA: + 21,400

25. San Diego MSA: + 20,800

26. Cincinnati MSA: + 20,200

27. Charlotte MSA: + 20,100

28. San Jose MSA: + 20,000

29. Raleigh MSA: + 19,600

What's notable is the inclusion of Cincinnati within this grouping of cities.  Very impressive.

^ Yeah, Cincinnati MSA looks down right impressive on this list! We always hear about how Columbus is dominating the state when it comes to growth, but Cincy has double their job growth in this time span! I initially thought some of these numbers could be inflated by job sprawl south of Dayton, but in another thread (can't remember which), it was said that almost all of Dayton's southern sprawl which gets counted in Cincy's MSA is residential. Austin Landing is in Montgomery County, so whatever jobs have sprouted along there get counted as Dayton. It makes me wonder, though, where all these jobs are coming from. I know the CVG area is growing quickly with industrial/warehouse growth, and the Monroe-CinDay area is also booming with industrial type of growth, too. I'd also wager that the service industry has grown quite a bit.

It's amazing how Nashville only has a slight edge over Cincinnati.  One has an exploding skyline and the other has maybe 1 crane. 

 

I think it's pretty obvious that Cincinnati is still filling up existing residential and office structures.  The industrial park where I work was deserted in 2011.  Now all of the vacant truck terminals are back to life and have "help wanted" signs out front. 

Light industrial went on a huge speculative binge in the 2000s near me.

Cleveland's struggles continue. Surprised Milwaukee is having issues.

 

Actually looking at the BLS stats, it looks like CLE just had a weak month. Not quite sure why we're breaking down this list like this. It would probably be better to do a monthly report for an entire year to get a better picture.

The bigger surprise for me is Virginia Beach/Norfolk MSA: -6,000, which is generally a stable area statistically.

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

The bigger surprise for me is Virginia Beach/Norfolk MSA: -6,000, which is generally a stable area statistically.

 

Lots of government cutbacks there with both military and NASA.  My cousin was recently laid off from Langley research after years on the job there.

Damn, that sucks.  I have a soft-spot for Hampton Roads.

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

The bigger surprise for me is Virginia Beach/Norfolk MSA: -6,000, which is generally a stable area statistically.

 

My guess is because there's a lot of government contracting jobs in the region which are dragging the numbers down. Big contraction in this sector as of late. Could be coupled with shipbuilding too. Don't know much about US Naval contracts.

Awesome to see Cincy doing so well.  Hoping Columbus and Cleveland can keep picking it up.

 

I too wonder where all those jobs are from but I think there are a lot in NKY with a lot of expansions in both NKY and Ohio side.

 

I am wondering though, is Dayton possibly lumped in with Cincy?  I didn't see them listed even though they are one of the larger MSA's in the USA relatively speaking for this list, at least a top 85 MSA in the USA.

 

Some midwest cities doing really well:

 

12. Minneapolis/Saint Paul MSA: + 41,600

 

15. Detroit MSA: + 34,000

 

26. Cincinnati MSA: + 20,200

 

33. Indianapolis MSA: + 18,000

 

36. Louisville MSA: + 14,000

 

37. Grand Rapids MSA: + 13,700

 

43. Des Moines MSA: + 9,300

 

45. Omaha MSA: + 8,900

 

46. Madison MSA: + 8,800

 

Not so great but not too bad:

 

20. Chicago MSA: + 25,900

 

38. Kansas City MSA: + 13,000

 

39. Saint Louis MSA: + 11,300

 

44. Columbus MSA: + 9,000

 

Growing but slowly:

 

54. Milwaukee MSA: + 6,200

 

61. Cleveland MSA: + 4,300

 

78. Lexington MSA: + 500

 

 

 

Goes against conventional wisdom of Columbus being the best performing MSA in the state. Surprising to see that over a whole year. Maybe Cincy is still recovering from the Great Recession?

 

It would be interesting to see the median and mean annual salaries for the jobs added to each MSA.

 

It wouldn't make sense to have Dayton together with Cincinnati, since they are separate MSAs (and even separate CSAs).

Goes against conventional wisdom of Columbus being the best performing MSA in the state. Surprising to see that over a whole year. Maybe Cincy is still recovering from the Great Recession?

 

It would be interesting to see the median and mean annual salaries for the jobs added to each MSA.

 

It wouldn't make sense to have Dayton together with Cincinnati, since they are separate MSAs (and even separate CSAs).

 

On Cincy recovering from recession, it looks like this past year in 2017 they hit peak employment of approx. 1,082,000 jobs in the summer.  Pre-recession highs in 07 and 08 looked like around 1,070,000 jobs in summer peak

 

However, 2017 looks like the first time it went past pre-recession peak.

 

The labor force is now looking about exactly the same as it was in 2008 but with a lower unemployment rate.

 

https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LAUMT391714000000005?amp%253bdata_tool=XGtable&output_view=data&include_graphs=true

 

Here's some interesting #'s:

 

Cincy Nov. 17 non-farm employment: 1,112,800 with average wage: $23.14/hour with 1.8% growth from Nov. 2016 to Nov. 2017 in non-farm employment

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/summary/blssummary_cincinnati.pdf

 

Dayton Nov. 17 non-farm employment: 397,500 with average wage: $22.73/hour with 2.4%! growth from Nov. 2016 to Nov. 2017 in non-farm employment

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/summary/blssummary_dayton.pdf

 

Columbus Nov. 17 non-farm employment: 1,097,000 with average wage: $23.48 with 0.8% growth from Nov. 2016 to Nov. 2017 in non-farm employment

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/summary/blssummary_columbus_oh.pdf

 

Cleveland Nov. 17 non-farm employment: 1,065,600 with average wage: $23.20 with 0.4% growth from Nov. 2016 to Nov. 2017 in non-farm employment

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/summary/blssummary_cleveland_oh.pdf

 

Akron Nov. 17 non-farm employment: 343,600 with average wage: $22.32 with -0.8% growth from Nov. 2016 to Nov. 2017 in non-farm employment

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/summary/blssummary_akron.pdf

Dayton I'm not surprised by as someone earlier alluded to...those light-industrial spec buildings. They are popping up all over Metro Dayton.  Akron I'm kinda surprised by as I thought it was doing fine (well, at least better than the other DATY 2ndary Ohio cities).

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

I'd caution this data is preliminary and is definitely subject to change in the short and long term so I wouldn't put a lot of stock in November numbers until at least the next report.

 

Also, in order to properly view this data you need to look at every month of the year not just one specific month because of the seasonal variability of job types.

 

It was my mistake to comment, I thought the BLS had actually come out with a specific report about the year. This isn't the case, it's just the usual data they release monthly.

^Right but isn't it safe to say that almost everywhere in the nation, the summer is the peak and the winter is the downturn?  That's pretty uniform across the United States.  There is probably a little less of a ridge in the south vs the north due to construction jobs, and thinking in Cincy probably a slightly smaller downturn than in Cleveland due to winter weather, but not by much

 

Maybe the #'s aren't all exact but it gives a good indication of what the economy is doing

^Right but isn't it safe to say that almost everywhere in the nation, the summer is the peak and the winter is the downturn?  That's pretty uniform across the United States.  There is probably a little less of a ridge in the south vs the north due to construction jobs, and thinking in Cincy probably a slightly smaller downturn than in Cleveland due to winter weather, but not by much

 

Maybe the #'s aren't all exact but it gives a good indication of what the economy is doing

 

1. Revisions from preliminary data are usually minor but sometimes aren't. The BLS even cautions about making assumptions from prelim data.

2. Data can be quite different. Cleveland's preliminary data for November is 0.4% growth (not-revised). In June it was 2.1%. That's a lot more jobs and a much higher ranking. An annual average gives a complete picture after the data has been revised. Every market has a different seasonal nature so they don't ebb and flow together.

^I understand what you are saying.  I think on those profiles they have a graph showing average growth year over year per month, but maybe I am looking at it wrong.

 

Are you saying that the best numbers to look at are end of year #'s and aggregate total jobs gained over the year, instead of what this was showing which was increase of jobs from Nov. 16 - Nov. 17?

^I understand what you are saying.  I think on those profiles they have a graph showing average growth year over year per month, but maybe I am looking at it wrong.

 

Are you saying that the best numbers to look at are end of year #'s and aggregate total jobs gained over the year, instead of what this was showing which was increase of jobs from Nov. 16 - Nov. 17?

 

I'm saying:

 

1. Let the prelim data shake out: Nov. will be revised in the Dec. update.

 

2. Then look at monthly data over a year. I believe Cincy is still ahead of Columbus and Cle for the last 12 non-prelim data months (ending with Oct.-Oct.) if that is what you are looking for. But the aggregate picture is better and more accurate. Still not perfect because BLS sometimes revises numbers over the long term as well but it is much closer to a complete picture of the job market.

Goes against conventional wisdom of Columbus being the best performing MSA in the state. Surprising to see that over a whole year. Maybe Cincy is still recovering from the Great Recession?

 

It would be interesting to see the median and mean annual salaries for the jobs added to each MSA.

 

It wouldn't make sense to have Dayton together with Cincinnati, since they are separate MSAs (and even separate CSAs).

As you implied, it's understandable why such job statistics will trigger consternation from Columbus; the numbers dramatically alter the standard narrative.  Needless to say, because such figures aren't carved in stone, they will inevitably vary from year-to-year and decade-to-decade (and maybe radically so) - but at least not this year that just ended.  The sobering fact is that these job stats are legit, that the Cincy/Dayton MSAs have not been somehow scrambled together and that the BLS isn't just fiddling around until more accurate numbers pop up.  All this kind of magical thinking only detracts from the realization that Cincinnati's job growth has been so significant that, at least for now, a new narrative needs to be recognized. 

 

 

Goes against conventional wisdom of Columbus being the best performing MSA in the state. Surprising to see that over a whole year. Maybe Cincy is still recovering from the Great Recession?

 

It would be interesting to see the median and mean annual salaries for the jobs added to each MSA.

 

It wouldn't make sense to have Dayton together with Cincinnati, since they are separate MSAs (and even separate CSAs).

As you implied, it's understandable why such job statistics will trigger consternation from Columbus; the numbers dramatically alter the standard narrative.  Needless to say, because such figures aren't carved in stone, they will inevitably vary from year-to-year and decade-to-decade (and maybe radically so) - but at least not this year that just ended.  The sobering fact is that these job stats are legit, that the Cincy/Dayton MSAs have not been somehow scrambled together and that the BLS isn't just fiddling around until more accurate numbers pop up.  All this kind of magical thinking only detracts from the realization that Cincinnati's job growth has been so significant that, at least for now, a new narrative needs to be recognized.

 

I hate economic city rankings because it leads to responses like this.

I think these sorts of unweighted statistics are quite useful because the typical "Top Cities for .... " lists insert some sort of distortion.  For example, we see quite clearly from this list that Nashville is not the runaway jobs creator that its hype machine wants you to believe it is.  True, there are 10+ skyscrapers going up there as we speak, but they are mostly low-employment hotels and apartment towers. 

 

We also see that Detroit(!) is crushing the New South cities (again, Nashville, Charlotte) in raw job creation, even though it is of course a much bigger metro.

 

The Cincinnati statistic is a surprise to everyone since there is not an outburst of new construction here.  But as I mentioned previously, there were A TON of vacancies in buildings of all kinds during the recession that no doubt are re-absorbing activity, and many of them don't look like traditional office buildings.  There is a ton of Class B & C office and light industrial in and around Cincinnati where quite often 100+ people work. 

 

Yeah, I'm in the middle on these rankings, it does give us a good sense of what is going on but understand it isn't completely accurate.

 

I would argue though that most cities in the north have around the same job cycle, so if the BLS is saying Cincy was +20k, Columbus +10k, Cleveland +3k, maybe the numbers aren't exact but I highly doubt Cincy would drop to +15k, maybe to +18 or +19k.

 

To Jake's point, he has to be right in the absorption of buildings.  Reading the courier almost everyday, it seems you always see a manufacturer or other type is expanding, those jobs add up over a year.  A place like Blue Ash seems to be filling up and will probably need new office buildings, they are already building industrial buildings.  We just arn'et really seeing it with new construction in the city itself.  Though driving around lately in East Walnut Hills, there are 4 active, small to large residential construction sites going on in a very small area.

^Queen City Square was a huge office building for a market of our size.  Phase II, the big tower, is 800,000 sq feet. 

 

By comparison, the new Bridgestone tower in Nashville is slightly over 500,000 sq feet.  This is the only major office tower that has gone up in DT Nashville during the current boom.  The rest of the towers are residential or hotels. 

This is getting off topic, and I've been to Nashville a lot, but I wish Cincinnati could start cashing in on some type of music draw parallel to Nashville.  Something like the Emery and turn it into a hot spot for country music acts, even if small.  I know the economics probably don't work at all right now but I think something like that could do well in Cincinnati.  That said, I know for certain there has got to be tons of starving to death artists in Nashville that are having a tougher and tougher time paying rent, so we could be a good secondary market for it, if someone that had some dough and connections decided to open up a recording studio in Cincy

This is getting off topic, and I've been to Nashville a lot, but I wish Cincinnati could start cashing in on some type of music draw parallel to Nashville.  Something like the Emery and turn it into a hot spot for country music acts, even if small.  I know the economics probably don't work at all right now but I think something like that could do well in Cincinnati.  That said, I know for certain there has got to be tons of starving to death artists in Nashville that are having a tougher and tougher time paying rent, so we could be a good secondary market for it, if someone that had some dough and connections decided to open up a recording studio in Cincy

 

Would be a long uphill climb to catch up with Nashville. 

 

Don't you guys still have Ultrasuede?  John Curley's studio?

I was just talking to someone yesterday who is about 22 who wants to play music in Nashville even though he's never been there.  I told him that the rent is ridiculous down there and I don't think he understands what paying $1,000+ mo. and having 2-3 roommates means. 

 

I imagine that the typical gig in Nashville pays no more than one in Ohio because there are no shortage of people willing to play for $25.  20 $25 gigs per month = $500. 

 

 

It's hard to get gigs there because the bands are really cliquey.

I was just talking to someone yesterday who is about 22 who wants to play music in Nashville even though he's never been there.  I told him that the rent is ridiculous down there and I don't think he understands what paying $1,000+ mo. and having 2-3 roommates means. 

 

I imagine that the typical gig in Nashville pays no more than one in Ohio because there are no shortage of people willing to play for $25.  20 $25 gigs per month = $500. 

 

 

 

Then again, in a booming economy there are plenty of day jobs for would-be musicians.  d

 

Then again, in a booming economy there are plenty of day jobs for would-be musicians.  d

 

 

Yeah he parks cars for a boutique hotel in Cincinnati.  I can't imagine that the same gig pays any more, let alone significantly more there.  But he's currently paying about 1/3 what he'd be paying to rent in Nashville. 

 

 

It's hard to get gigs there because the bands are really cliquey.

 

I'm just skeptical that there are many high-paying regular gigs there.  Unless you're playing high class charity events and rich people weddings, you aren't pocketing more than $50 playing in a 3-5 piece band.  Which is no different than here. 

 

Even Nashville has high-paying regular gigs for bands that play Nickelback covers in strip malls.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.