Jump to content

Featured Replies

Quite impressive.

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

  • Replies 4k
  • Views 128.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

Very nice.

Really great audio/visual piece with Mario San Marco- very nice photos

They are building out the curbs surrounding QCS. From 4th, down Sycamore, and around 3rd. Guessing the sidewalks will be poured soon.

"It's just fate, as usual, keeping its bargain and screwing us in the fine print..." - John Crichton

Alright - does it not look like something is going on at the base of the west side  of the tiara?  I not sure how much it will cover, but it looks vaguely like the base of the rendering.

I was out of town for a while and looking forward to checking out QCS from the cut in the hill coming from the airport.  I was disappointed.  The tiara just sort of blends into the sky from that vantage point and the building looks sawed off at the top.  They really need to do something to give the tiara have more weight.

Agreed! Glass it in and make it glisten

Bling Bling

I was out of town for a while and looking forward to checking out QCS from the cut in the hill coming from the airport. I was disappointed. The tiara just sort of blends into the sky from that vantage point and the building looks sawed off at the top. They really need to do something to give the tiara have more weight.

 

I have a friend who works for Turner Construction, the company that built the tower- I'll ask him if there are any internal talks regarding the tiara- although in our talk the other day- he implied its basically done. 

Agreed! Glass it in and make it glisten

 

+3 Glass the birdcage!

Really great audio/visual piece with Mario San Marco- very nice photos

Very nice.

Quite impressive.

 

Thank you gentlemen, glad you enjoyed it.

 

I was out of town for a while and looking forward to checking out QCS from the cut in the hill coming from the airport. I was disappointed. The tiara just sort of blends into the sky from that vantage point and the building looks sawed off at the top. They really need to do something to give the tiara have more weight.

 

I have a friend who works for Turner Construction, the company that built the tower- I'll ask him if there are any internal talks regarding the tiara- although in our talk the other day- he implied its basically done.

 

When I was up there, they seemed to say it would stay open and they had no plans to add anything to it except signage. However, they did mention that the thing would be lit up quite impressively. Their words though, not mine. I'm still bummed there's no observation deck.

 

If the tiara is supposed to be so damn prominent, why in the hell would they construct an invisible crown?  The tiara is a massive blunder and an outright embarrassment to Cincinnati.  They need to stop cutting corners and get creative up there.

They completely botched the tiara.  I thought it was going to be more like the Bank of America building in Atlanta.  That is the way to do an open crown.

 

http://assets.bizjournals.com/story_image/205423-600-0-3.jpg

 

The good thing is that it could easily be fixed by simply filling in the gaps with more steel, the bad thing is that it will probably never happen.

I am trying to reserve judgement until everything is done, but I think ultimately the thread count on the tiara will be a little low.

Several of you guys should get together and contact WS and air your complaints and suggestions..I have done this by myself but with no positive results.

Maybe they should tear it down and start over!!

^Leave that for the Kenwood tower.

If you guys think complaining to W&S is going to change something, you're crazy.  They love their building and unless one of you comes up with a million dollar donation to change the tiara, its going to remain the way it is.

Is the tiara really that bad?

The tiara still looks terrible from that angle.  It doesn't blend in with building at all.

The tiara still looks terrible from that angle.  It doesn't blend in with building at all.

 

Agreed.  From East/West it resembles the Amnesty International logo sans barbed wire.

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ38KhlaNys_ilCXRlBXA_Ru405LGFRk4Ld2QFc9OQrdpClgsI&t=1&usg=__wPmLTUqz3tSzD-gywuzJQpjtnbQ=

 

Well, not so much but...

Below is my recent letter to John Barrow:

 

With all due respect to your courage in building the magnificent QCS in difficult economic times, I am compelled to say the following: The tiara looks very much like a bird cage without the bird. Have you seen the building from Devou Park in Ky? You should ,you know, because the tiara is barely visible. The tiara should be filled in with some kind of sheet metal  with a non-white color.

Also, an observation deck should have been planned before construction began. But why not make one or two rooms near the top into an observation deck?!! The expense would be worth it, and Cincinnatians and out-of -towners would be eternally grateful.

The tower does much for the Cincinnati skyline, and you are to be congratulated for building such a beautiful building>

 

Regards, Jack Geis

you'll find more happiness if you convince yourselves that it is cool

The problem with an observation deck is that it needs to be served by dedicated elevators, which adds up to a lot of extra expense and several hundred fewer square feet of rentable space on each floor. You'd also need dedicated ticketing/support spaces down in the lobby, in addition to giving up an entire floor of your most expensive space to a function that has no chance of making a profit. It's not really worth doing unless you're talking about a new world's-tallest building in a major city with lots of tourists.

 

Granted, the Carew Tower observatory is served by the same elevators used by office tenants, but such an arrangement would be unthinkable in a new building with modern-day security concerns in mind, and the Carew Tower observatory doesn't even come close to meeting today's egress and accessibility codes.

you'll find more happiness if you convince yourselves that it is cool

 

I agree!  It's a blissful moment when you realize we are stuck with this and you can't do anything about it.  I still say hold judgement til it's finished......Light it up!!!

"A surgeon can always bury his mistakes. The best an architect can do is plant some ivy."

-- Frank Lloyd Wright

^ That's it...cover the tiara in ivy!!!

 

lol.

 

"Green roofs" are all the rage these days, after all.

With all the condensation being put off by the rooftop cooling towers up there, I wouldn't be surprised if the tiara starts growing some mossy fuzz anyway.

 

chiapet.jpg

With all the condensation being put off by the rooftop cooling towers up there, I wouldn't be surprised if the tiara starts growing some mossy fuzz anyway.

 

I doubt that's going to happen, and do we know if they're even water-cooled units at all?  They could just be regular fan coils which don't emit any water vapor at all.  If they did that might actually be kind of neat looking, especially on cold still days.  That does raise an issue of condensation and moisture in general though.  Cincinnati seems to have a lot of particulate pollution, whether artificial or natural.  Anyone who parks their car outside overnight knows this.  When this dust collects on the tubular sections of the crown and then gets washed down by morning dew or light rains it creates unsightly streaks of dirt on the underside.  The white color of the crown greatly exacerbates this problem, and that also contributes to its invisibility in our usually hazy skies.  The simplest solution would be to paint it a different color, but the question is what would that be?  Blues and grays that match the rest of the building could be even worse at blending with the sky, and red or black don't seem appropriate either.  Maybe a highly reflective silver?  I don't really know. 

My favorite shots of QCS are from the side...like this beauty from soapboxmedia.com

 

Cincy-skyline.jpg

http://soapboxmedia.com/features/1005soapboxupdatesavethedate.aspx

 

We'll see what the tiara looks like at night with lighting...

The tiara still looks terrible from that angle.  It doesn't blend in with building at all.

The tiara still looks terrible from that angle.  It doesn't blend in with building at all.

 

Agreed.  From East/West it resembles the Amnesty International logo sans barbed wire.

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ38KhlaNys_ilCXRlBXA_Ru405LGFRk4Ld2QFc9OQrdpClgsI&t=1&usg=__wPmLTUqz3tSzD-gywuzJQpjtnbQ=

 

Well, not so much but...

 

I was thinking it looks more like a zippo lighter. I still say glass it in but I'm not complaining.

Check out the night lights:

webcam.jpg

The top of the tower still looks very unfinished. Hopefully, the Great American Insurance logo and tiara lights correct this.

Check out the night lights:

webcam.jpg

The top of the tower still looks very unfinished. Hopefully, the Great American Insurance logo and tiara lights correct this.

 

Damn you...you beat me to it...

 

nightqcs.jpg

 

 

Guys they may light the tiara like this?

Did they get the wrong lamps on the right side (west)? Or is it the glare from Atrium making it look less bright? Or maybe the fixtures are just aimed wrong..

I'm assuming they just haven't aimed the lights at all yet. 

Uplighting looks good. Any chance for LEDs on the tiara?

 

And about glassing in the tiara for a better day time look: I always envisioned the tiara looking like it does in this rendering of by RM Design Studio:

 

banks.jpg

Why not put led's down the building like you see in Dallas?

 

 

Great American Tower from in front of the banks along 2nd street.

 

photo-2.jpg

Just before the storm on October 13:

 

66295_868790799240_12904118_45718672_7833340_n.jpg

 

66295_868790794250_12904118_45718671_1834614_n.jpg

 

69350_868790524790_12904118_45718670_1445451_n.jpg

That last picture clearly shows how the tiara is almost invisible at times. 

When we were leading people from around the world down to the Montgomery Inn Boathouse for dinner one night (conference, we were the hosts, and they stayed at the Hilton), people were remarking that the tiara was ... ugly. The building they said looked nice, but they thought it was still incomplete!

I love the angle in the first picture Sherman. Great shots!

 

That last photo shows what's wrong with the tiara at present.

^What tiara?

You can see it. It's just that the clouds there is almost the same color as it. I can see it from Sharonville. And from there it's clearly the tallest downtown.

When we were leading people from around the world down to the Montgomery Inn Boathouse for dinner one night (conference, we were the hosts, and they stayed at the Hilton), people were remarking that the tiara was ... ugly. The building they said looked nice, but they thought it was still incomplete!

 

The invisible tiara makes me imagine what the building would look like if it continued to narrow with Art Deco-y rectangular angles until it came to a point of some kind. Perhaps (definitely?) better than with the tiara.

I think at this point the best bet will be to get them to repaint it- instead of white, a very shiny metallic reflective paint.  There's obviously no way they will fill it in with glass or add more beams (personally I think that would have been the best design option), but at least by repainting it it could become more noticeable. 

 

sigh.

 

oh, and GREAT pictures!

Pic from today:

 

 

DSC_3639.jpg

 

^ I know a lot of people in this forum have complained about the side angle (picture 1 above) but i actually think overall, the building looks best from the side.  From the font its this large massive rectangle with some tapering at the top..  from the side it has more definition and style.

You can see it. It's just that the clouds there is almost the same color as it. I can see it from Sharonville. And from there it's clearly the tallest downtown.

 

That was sarcasm.  It can be seen from many places that are far from DT.  Carew and QCS are visible from Hebron, KY as well as the Licking River bridge.  The latter of the two provides a perspective that makes QCS look ridiculously out of scale not because of it's height but it's girth.  Really should have been 25% thinner and 10 stories taller...and I don't say that because I have a height fetish - I don't.  Let your eyes scan from "Central Trust" to QCS and you wonder why the review board green-lighted such a fatty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.