Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Luvcbus said:

 

Worthington housing study suggests demand for 2000 more residences

 

"A study of Worthington's housing suggests there is demand for 2,000 more residences and prescribes adding smaller, closer together and more affordable options in strategic areas.

 

Worthington, a landlocked suburb surrounded by Columbus, currently has nearly 15,000 residents and about 6,150 housing units. Its 5 ½ square miles are already mostly developed.

 

Strategies to diversify housing that Camoin suggests in the report include allowing duplexes, accessory dwelling units, mixed-use development, rowhomes along the boundaries between commercial districts and neighborhoods, patio houses and village-style development with smaller homes on smaller lots. The report also suggests strategies to support existing apartment buildings to maintain affordable housing that's already in the suburb.

 

O'Brien also cautioned in his presentation against allowing citizens with strong opinions to have a disproportionate say in opposing a development, saying it's a problem every community in America faces. Camoin suggests in its report setting clear protocols for project approval to avoid uncertainty for developers that could keep them away from Worthington."

 

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/local/2024/05/27/worthington-housing-study-2000-units-needed-affordable-housing-apartments-duplexes-rowhomes/73733397007/

 

It’s almost like the old United Methodist Children’s Home land should be developed. You could fit a ton of stuff in there. 
 

If they would have built worthington gateway correctly, they also could have added even more units. The entire length of high north of the downtown area is so crappy and underdeveloped. 

  • Replies 313
  • Views 30.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • LC has now filed a lawsuit in federal court against the city of Worthington.    Developer sues Worthington over Methodist Children's property   “Lifestyle argues that the city showed

  • ColDayMan
    ColDayMan

    It's approved! Worthington green-lights High North redevelopment of Shops at Worthington Place     The developer now expects to break ground on the Worthington redevelopment

  • CbusOrBust
    CbusOrBust

    Worthington Gateway          

Posted Images

I would love to see the Shops at Worthington Mall be redeveloped into a separate 5 story mixed used developments. 

8 minutes ago, KyleofColumbus said:

I would love to see the Shops at Worthington Mall be redeveloped into a separate 5 story mixed used developments. 

There was a 10 story proposed for the mall property. 

here’s the proposal: 

An update from April of this year says residential in the south building was approved. 
 

https://worthington.org/DocumentCenter/View/9161/7227-N-High-St--ARB-100-2022-PUD-05-2022?bidId=

 

 

Edited by VintageLife

17 hours ago, Luvcbus said:

 

Worthington housing study suggests demand for 2000 more residences

 

"A study of Worthington's housing suggests there is demand for 2,000 more residences and prescribes adding smaller, closer together and more affordable options in strategic areas.

 

Worthington, a landlocked suburb surrounded by Columbus, currently has nearly 15,000 residents and about 6,150 housing units. Its 5 ½ square miles are already mostly developed.

 

Strategies to diversify housing that Camoin suggests in the report include allowing duplexes, accessory dwelling units, mixed-use development, rowhomes along the boundaries between commercial districts and neighborhoods, patio houses and village-style development with smaller homes on smaller lots. The report also suggests strategies to support existing apartment buildings to maintain affordable housing that's already in the suburb.

 

O'Brien also cautioned in his presentation against allowing citizens with strong opinions to have a disproportionate say in opposing a development, saying it's a problem every community in America faces. Camoin suggests in its report setting clear protocols for project approval to avoid uncertainty for developers that could keep them away from Worthington."

 

https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/local/2024/05/27/worthington-housing-study-2000-units-needed-affordable-housing-apartments-duplexes-rowhomes/73733397007/

 

I support the first part but the second part I disagree with. If most of Worthington doesn’t want it, then that needs to be respected. Public officials are there to serve their constituents, not those trying to move into the area. If its a select loud few that’s one thing, if its a vast majority they need to listen.

  • 3 weeks later...

 

Thomas Worthington HS addition

 

IMG_20240617_151839_6.thumb.jpg.7619614cca22ae74533cd16bd5ded1e9.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151853_0.thumb.jpg.416d993f0de1d6ace2ebb07165b2896b.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151937_7.thumb.jpg.76b903ce9daaffe63a1056701fba4e2f.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151822_8.thumb.jpg.87410a7815ce4f48a879a365c970516d.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151929_2.thumb.jpg.1ce20a059d7576b55960c3947ee34343.jpg

 

3 hours ago, CbusOrBust said:

 

Thomas Worthington HS addition

 

IMG_20240617_151839_6.thumb.jpg.7619614cca22ae74533cd16bd5ded1e9.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151853_0.thumb.jpg.416d993f0de1d6ace2ebb07165b2896b.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151937_7.thumb.jpg.76b903ce9daaffe63a1056701fba4e2f.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151822_8.thumb.jpg.87410a7815ce4f48a879a365c970516d.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151929_2.thumb.jpg.1ce20a059d7576b55960c3947ee34343.jpg

 

An actual respectable institutional building. Not some metal, fiber cement, block concoction.

11 hours ago, CbusOrBust said:

 

Thomas Worthington HS addition

 

IMG_20240617_151839_6.thumb.jpg.7619614cca22ae74533cd16bd5ded1e9.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151853_0.thumb.jpg.416d993f0de1d6ace2ebb07165b2896b.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151937_7.thumb.jpg.76b903ce9daaffe63a1056701fba4e2f.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151822_8.thumb.jpg.87410a7815ce4f48a879a365c970516d.jpg

 

IMG_20240617_151929_2.thumb.jpg.1ce20a059d7576b55960c3947ee34343.jpg

 

 

It's nice to see a new public school building that doesn't look like a prison. 

  • 6 months later...

NIMBY's win.

 

Lifestyle Communities loses lawsuit against Worthington over UMCH project.

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2025/01/08/worthington-lifestyle-communites-umch-lawsuit.html

 

Quote

The city of Worthington has notched a legal win against Lifestyle Communities over a property the company has been attempting to redevelop for a decade.

Lifestyle Communities and the city have been battling in court over the United Methodist Children's Home site the developer owns at 1033 High St. In late December, a U.S. District Court judge granted the city's motion for summary judgement in the case.

The judgement ends a nearly three-year legal battle that started when Lifestyle Communities filed a lawsuit against the city in March 2022. The lawsuit came after the city rejected a rezoning request for a mixed-use development on the site.

 

image.png.de44b026011a7a7c748cadc5b727545e.png

16 minutes ago, Pablo said:

NIMBY's win.

 

Lifestyle Communities loses lawsuit against Worthington over UMCH project.

 

 

image.png.de44b026011a7a7c748cadc5b727545e.png

Absolute trash, although lifestyle communities is a trash developer.

 

i would sue to force the city to buy the property from me in that situation.  

Edited by VintageLife

After Dismissal of Developer’s Lawsuit, What’s Next for Key Worthington Site?

 

The City of Worthington notched a legal victory in its decade-long battle over the future of the former United Methodist Children’s Home site, but the final fate of the property remains far from settled.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Sarah Morrison granted summary judgement to the city in a suit brought by Lifestyle Communities (LC), the developer that owns the 38-acre parcel near Worthington’s historic center that has been the subject of much debate over the years.

 

“Lifestyle Communities has the option to appeal Judge Morrison’s decision, so it is possible this case will move on to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals,” said Anne Brown, Communications Director for the City of Worthington, when asked for a comment on the ruling. “Whether the lawsuit ends here or continues on appeal, Lifestyle Communities owns the property, and the city has not heard from them as to their next steps…we look forward to a productive use of the property in the future.”

 

More below:

https://columbusunderground.com/after-dismissal-of-developers-lawsuit-whats-next-for-key-worthington-site-bw1/

 

Worthington-UMCH-2020-9-768x429.png

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

^That rendering is horrendous! Just look at all that squaller! Thank goodness Worthington was able to squash this proposal.

On 1/9/2025 at 4:21 PM, Pablo said:

^That rendering is horrendous! Just look at all that squaller! Thank goodness Worthington was able to squash this proposal.

Them wanting single story retail along high is what is killing me. Just add some multi use buildings. You live in a city, get over it. 
 

how dumb are city leaders that they can’t tell mixed use is what makes things popular and worth going to. When people live above those retail locations they are more likely to go to those businesses. 

Edited by VintageLife

On 1/9/2025 at 4:21 PM, Pablo said:

^That rendering is horrendous! Just look at all that squaller! Thank goodness Worthington was able to squash this proposal.

Way too much green space, pedestrian amenities and nice design choices. Once they come back with bland cubes surrounded by parking it'll get approved in an instant!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.