Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Views 496.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • The Clinic will cut the ribbon on its quantum computer today. NOW is when the city should go all out to get one of the two Advanced Research Project Agency - Health sites for the city.  For the moment

  • Disagree. We could use more direct flights to more places that 500 miles or more away, we would be a stronger attraction to business. And if we could get to downtowns in Columbus, Cincinnati, Pittsbur

  • LlamaLawyer
    LlamaLawyer

    Y’know, the county as a whole isn’t growing either (at least not till recently). Downtown Cleveland and University Circle are growing as fast or faster than ANYWHERE else in the county. Cleveland co

Posted Images

Take on me!

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Interesting how they're advertising the Wolstein Center

I was playing around with the mayor's budget estimate for 2019 and noticed that receipts from income tax were $314.8 million in 2016 and are estimated to be $424.9 million for 2019.

 

Assuming the rate of taxation was 2.25% in 2016 and 2.5% in 2019, that means the taxable income in Cleveland will have increased by slightly over $3 billion in three years. Typically the projected receipts have been  underestimated, so $3 billion increase is a conservative estimate.

 

I would say that extra $3 billion is very visible around town. 

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

That's a pretty strong indicator of increased population, increased employment, increased incomes or possibly all three.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

25 minutes ago, KJP said:

That's a pretty strong indicator of increased population, increased employment, increased incomes or possibly all three.

 

Of course, Clevelanders aren't the only ones paying the city's income tax. Given the almost static population numbers, I'd say the growth reliably indicates new hiring as well as higher-paying jobs replacing lower-paying ones. It's also probably fair to say people moving into town are making more than the people moving out.  In any case, it's all good news; but I'm not sure it's an indicator of population growth.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

56 minutes ago, Dougal said:

I was playing around with the mayor's budget estimate for 2019 and noticed that receipts from income tax were $314.8 million in 2016 and are estimated to be $424.9 million for 2019.

 

Assuming the rate of taxation was 2.25% in 2016 and 2.5% in 2019, that means the taxable income in Cleveland will have increased by slightly over $3 billion in three years. Typically the projected receipts have been  underestimated, so $3 billion increase is a conservative estimate.

 

I would say that extra $3 billion is very visible around town. 

I believe that Cleveland's tax rate was 2.0% in 2016. 

3 minutes ago, freefourur said:

I believe that Cleveland's tax rate was 2.0% in 2016. 

 

Ouch ... that would cut the increase by more than half.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

4 minutes ago, Dougal said:

Ouch ... that would cut the increase by more than half.

 

Not quite. It also increased the credit to 100% up to 2.5%, so if you live in Cleveland and work elsewhere your Cleveland taxes probably went down. It's hard to tell how much of a difference that makes overall since most of the income tax money comes from non-residents so the credit wouldn't be relevant to them.

There's also a good amount of units coming off of the 15 year tax abatement on projects from the early to mid-2000's that are paying more taxes now. That trend will only continue for the foreseeable future. 

1 hour ago, Mendo said:

 

Not quite. It also increased the credit to 100% up to 2.5%, so if you live in Cleveland and work elsewhere your Cleveland taxes probably went down. It's hard to tell how much of a difference that makes overall since most of the income tax money comes from non-residents so the credit wouldn't be relevant to them.

 

So it's probably fair to say income went up by $1.5 billion, still a sizable number in terms of disposable income. 

 

 

34 minutes ago, w28th said:

There's also a good amount of units coming off of the 15 year tax abatement on projects from the early to mid-2000's that are paying more taxes now. That trend will only continue for the foreseeable future. 

 

True; but I was only looking at income taxes, not property taxes.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

On 9/5/2019 at 11:55 AM, Dougal said:

I was playing around with the mayor's budget estimate for 2019 and noticed that receipts from income tax were $314.8 million in 2016 and are estimated to be $424.9 million for 2019.

 

Assuming the rate of taxation was 2.25% in 2016 and 2.5% in 2019, that means the taxable income in Cleveland will have increased by slightly over $3 billion in three years. Typically the projected receipts have been  underestimated, so $3 billion increase is a conservative estimate.

 

I would say that extra $3 billion is very visible around town. 

 

@Dougal Do you have a link to the 2019 income tax revenue estimates? They would provide some interesting background for an article I'm writing in my head.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

2 minutes ago, KJP said:

 

@Dougal Do you have a link to the 2019 income tax revenue estimates? They would provide some interesting background for an article I'm writing in my head.

 

With pleasure.  Based on revenue gains, that last tax increase probably wasn't actually needed. I always say if you want more taxes, get more taxpayers. ?

 

http://www.city.cleveland.oh.us/sites/default/files/forms_publications/2019MayorsEstimate.pdf

 

 

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

Where do you see 2016 income tax receipts @Dougal? I see that 2017 receipts were $389,045,794.

 

EDIT: Never mind, I found it on Page 81 (or 87 if the title pages are included). Thanks!  

Edited by KJP

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

A California fintech company opens its R&D office here. 1st US outpost outside of its base in California. Also has offices in Toronto and Melbourne.

 

Silicon Valley fintech firm Nomis Solutions opens R&D facility in Beachwood

 

"Silicon Valley's Nomis Solutions has planted a flag in Northeast Ohio with a new R&D facility it's now running in Beachwood.

 

Nomis, founded in 2004 and based in San Bruno, Calif., bills itself as an "innovative fintech company focused on ensuring on-going value creation for the world's smartest financial institutions." It uses big data to provide pricing advisory services to financial services clients via mathematical models that are used by banks to optimally price rates for deposits and loans....."

 

https://www.crainscleveland.com/technology/silicon-valley-fintech-firm-nomis-solutions-opens-rd-facility-beachwood

 

 

 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

^  "The share of downtown's workforce that lives in Cleveland ticked down in 2017 too"

 

Since both jobs and housing increased, all this says is that jobs grew faster than housing.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

^yeah, it alone doesn't mean much. I could mean, as you said, the number of jobs downtown grew faster than did housing in the city. It also could mean that despite more downtown employment,  those that work there continue to move to the burbs and those that are living downtown either work at home (which is not counted by his data source) or work outside of downtown, such as in Univ Circle or outside the city.

^ Or it could mean that most of those still unemployed in Cleveland are (I hate to say this) unemployable in a traditional sense.  We will need programs such as we provide for the physically disabled to deal with the last 4%.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

4 hours ago, Dougal said:

^  "The share of downtown's workforce that lives in Cleveland ticked down in 2017 too"

 

Since both jobs and housing increased, all this says is that jobs grew faster than housing.

 

Sounds plausible. There's been maybe a 1000 units (or less) between 2017 and 2018. There's more than that under construction now.

The data being used in this analysis is slightly incorrect right now. It comes from LEHD data that recent added 2016 and 2017, but does not include federal workers for those two years. So data for 2016 and 2017 should probably not be included.

FWIW, the BLS preliminary employment data is out for August 2019.

 

https://www.bls.gov/eag/eag.oh_cleveland_msa.htm

 

Total employment for Greater Cleveland grew 1.2% YOY and reached 1,092.1, the highest employment has been since Dec. 2001. At current growth rates, employment would surpass the 30-year peak (1147.9 in Dec. 1999) in about 18-24 months.

 

The big employment sector continues to be Construction, which grew at 7.1%

Next biggest was Business and Professional Services, at 4.3%

Third was Education and Health Services, at a steady 2.2%

 

 

Edited by KJP

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Cool. Buy 'em and move downtown! ?

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

31 minutes ago, Terdolph said:

I have been saying this since the 1980's.  It was NAFTA that killed Cleveland.

You've been saying since the 1980's that a trade agreement that was signed in 1992 and went into effect in 1994 killed Cleveland?

59 minutes ago, KJP said:

Cool. Buy 'em and move downtown! ?

 

Lorain County taxes are the whole story.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

1 hour ago, Terdolph said:

I have been saying this since the 1980's.  It was NAFTA that killed Cleveland.

 

Probably has more to do with Cleveland's high illiteracy rate. True story....

 

And I didn't realize Cleveland had died. When its population drops to a Rome-in-The-Dark-Ages of 20,000 to 30,000, then I'll agree with you. 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

2 hours ago, PittsburgoDelendaEst said:

You've been saying since the 1980's that a trade agreement that was signed in 1992 and went into effect in 1994 killed Cleveland?

 

chris pratt oh snap GIF

Wrong thread 

Edited by KJP

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Another example of a successful Cleveland company, bought out by greedy outsiders who destroy the company. Home Team Marketing shut down on Sept 25 after 18 years in business.  I think all the schools and non-profits that were cheated out their money should band together in a class action and sue Steve O'Neill personally.

 

https://www.crainscleveland.com/sports-business/fallout-home-team-marketing-closing-runs-deep

 

^ Not just greedy; they sound like crooks.

Remember: It's the Year of the Snake

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi. S-W locked out while I was typing this, so thought it fits here. Written with regard to S-W specifically, but I think the education point broadly works in this thread:

 

Does anyone know what type of talent S-W would be looking for that we don’t have here? I looked up the best chemistry and inorganic chemistry programs in the country, and they’re scattered throughout the Ivy Leagues, Cal Ivies, and Midwest.

 

In addition to chemists, I’d assume Sherwin would need all the back office functions at HQ—accounting, HR, comms, etc. For these types of roles, it doesn’t really matter if you’re nearby a school because the talent pool is humongous and skill agnostic (I.e., you can be in HR at S-W as easily as you could be in HR at Bacardi).

 

Therefore, from a talent perspective, none of the sun belt cities beat Cleveland. On top of that, as I’ve referenced before—we’re surrounded by RPM, Ferro, Akzo, BASF, PPG, etc. from which to poach talent. Austin and Charlotte have what? Bank of America and Tito’s?

 

We’re talking a lot about airports. And ya. It’s a PITA to fly to second tier cities or internationally from Cle due to layovers. But honestly, if you’re flying that often—the hub probably wouldn’t help anyway, because you’re flying to your plants in rural Germany, or Chongqing, or wherever where you’d still need layovers even from CLT. Also, you have an AmEx Platinum, a United Explorer, a Delta Sky, a Chase Sapphire, etc.—and you’re spending your time taking meetings in lounges—just as you would if we were still a hub (shoutout if I was working next to you at ATL today). 
 

To me, the bigger cost (or opportunity) for the company is the talent base. And I haven’t seen an argument against Cle on that front. 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

As we all learned these numbers can drastically change but nonetheless they are positive all around from employment (staying over 1mil and up 10,000 YOY)  to total jobs (over 1.4% or 15,000 added). One surprising number is the jobs added in the professional sector. August showed an increase of 7,000 jobs and the preliminary for September shows an increase of 9,000 jobs (5.7%). Does anyone have any idea where this massive increase would be stemming from?

 

https://www.bls.gov/regions/midwest/oh_cleveland_msa.htm

 

43 minutes ago, jimphilpat1 said:

This my first time putting my two sense in.  I was born in Cleveland at 26th and payne, but moved away in my latter part of grade school. Came back and work in Cleveland  for couple times.  It seems that over the past 40 years there has been quite a few 500. Companies have left Cleveland for so called greener pasture. So I am not sure and hope SW stays in Cleveland. When are they supposed to give their big announcement?

 

 

Only two Fortune 500 companies got up and left Cleveland in the last 50 years. Most mid-size cities have lost Fortune 500 companies due to consolidations since the 1980s. Cleveland is no different. 

 

Discussing what companies have left Cleveland or were absorbed out of existence is only half of the equation. Let's also consider who has been added to Cleveland. Here are the top companies in Cleveland. How many of these firms didn't exist or weren't large enough yet to be in the Fortune 1000 50 years ago?

 

https://www.zippia.com/company/best-biggest-companies-in-cleveland-oh/

Edited by KJP

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

7 hours ago, KJP said:

 

Only two Fortune 500 companies got up and left Cleveland in the last 50 years. Most mid-size cities have lost Fortune 500 companies due to consolidations since the 1980s. Cleveland is no different. 

 

Discussing what companies have left Cleveland or were absorbed out of existence is only half of the equation. Let's also consider who has been added to Cleveland. Here are the top companies in Cleveland. How many of these firms didn't exist or weren't large enough yet to be in the Fortune 1000 50 years ago?

 

https://www.zippia.com/company/best-biggest-companies-in-cleveland-oh/

 

Who were the two?   BP I would say counts, Eaton?   They officially moved out of state for tax reasons but retain a strong presence in the suburbs.

 

Others merged or shut down.   BP would count because it merged and then moved.

BP and Diamond Shamrock. 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

What about TRW?  MBNA got acquired by Bank of America, no?

Yes, but those were through acquisitions/consolidations. Only two decided to move although one might consider BP in that same way, except that BP was larger than Amoco, right?

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

12 minutes ago, Pugu said:

What about TRW?  MBNA got acquired by Bank of America, no?

This same topic came up in this thread about a month ago and people seemed not to be able to grasp the point then and it continues now,  KJP is saying that only two companies packed up and left Greater Cleveland.  He is not including companies that moved to the suburbs or those that moved due to mergers or acquisitions (for example Office Max).  In my mind I think it is only one (Diamond) although KJP includes BP because the move happen well after the merger (although I think the move what clearly going to happen eventually).

 

And like KJP said this discussion is better suited for the Cleveland economic thread as I can see this thread zipping far off topic again   It is starting to get like the Cincinnati Street Car thread back in the day.

Edited by Htsguy

50 minutes ago, KJP said:

Yes, but those were through acquisitions/consolidations. Only two decided to move although one might consider BP in that same way, except that BP was larger than Amoco, right?

 

Maybe a bit pedantic but BP was never HQed in Cleveland. That HQ was lost years earlier when Sohio was acquired by BP and turned into a [very large] subsidiary.  

 

In any case, I very strongly agree with your main point about new companies. It's a bit like the misplaced focus on "brain drain."  The main problem isn't what we've lost but what Cleveland has failed to attract or grow itself.  

Edited by StapHanger

15 minutes ago, StapHanger said:

 

Maybe a bit pedantic but BP was never HQed in Cleveland. That HQ was lost years earlier when Sohio was acquired by BP and turned into a [very large] subsidiary.  

 

In any case, I very strongly agree with your main point about new companies. It's a bit like the misplaced focus on "brain drain."  The main problem isn't what we've lost but what Cleveland has failed to attract or grow itself.  

 

I'm pretty sure BP America was. This article states that BP, after acquiring Sohio in 1986, kept its BP America president officed in Cleveland until 1997 when he moved to New York. The acquisition of Amoco came a year later. The decline of Sohio's HQ staffing under BP America fell from 5,500 in 1986 to 1,000 by the time the Amoco buy was announced in 1998.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-1998-08-16-9808160403-story.html

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

^Right, but we don't usually count regional/subsidiary HQs in these lists.  I don't think BP America is or ever was a Fortune 500 company. 

I used to spend time in Dayton and I learned about the history and circumstances of the loss of NCR to Atlanta... That one stung badly, not sure anything that's happened here was ever quite that bad.

Edited by mu2010

^ losing ncr was bad, but a long time decline in the making.

 

what's much worse for my dayton spouse/former ncr employee is the city and ncr tore down the ncr campus and old warehouses and offices. those were beautiful structures and it would be hipster start up heaven if they were still there. she will never forgive the city for that and still mutters about how stupid boomers are lol. and she also says who would have thought that when patterson and ncr invented the term "you're fired!" by dragging people's stuff out front of those bldgs and burning it in front of everybody (yes, that is where the term 'you're fired' came from if you didn't know), that it would eventually turn out ncr and the neglectful city of dayton burned themselves. ncr is sore subject in our house needless to say lol!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.