1 minute ago, taestell said:

It's funny how close all of these places we're discussing are — 2448 Auburn Ave, CP Cincy, Park Tower Apartments — but they feel so far apart because there are so many auto-oriented buildings and parking lots. I really wish Uptown Consortium had a vision for remaking the Taft/McMillan corridor as a walkable mixed-use neighborhood. With all of the development happening south of UC and in Walnut Hills, this could become a great urban corridor if you filled in the central part area with more urban development. Then, put some kind of frequent circulator on Taft/McMillan from Hughes High School to the former Anthem site (with connections to north/south bus routes at Vine, Reading, and Gilbert) and you would have something really great.

Great point. It's only 1 mile from Vine to Gilbert on McMillan. That should be an easy walk or bike ride, but it feels impossibly far away due to how poorly designed McMillan is. 

^There are many violators, not just one.  Plus there are nearby disasters like the Cincinnati Public Schools superblock.  

1 hour ago, taestell said:

It's funny how close all of these places we're discussing are — 2448 Auburn Ave, CP Cincy, Park Tower Apartments — but they feel so far apart because there are so many auto-oriented buildings and parking lots and pedestrian-hostile streets. I really wish Uptown Consortium had a vision for remaking Taft/McMillan as a walkable mixed-use corridor. With all of the development happening south of UC and in Walnut Hills, this could become a great continuous corridor if you filled in the central area with more urban development. Then, put some kind of frequent circulator on Taft/McMillan from Hughes High School to the former Anthem site (with connections to north/south bus routes at Vine, Reading, and Gilbert) and you would have something really great.

Obviously it's a pipe dream at this point, but burying 71 in this section would be revolutionary.

^there are so many gaps in this area that the I-71 gap is just one more, and quite obviously, the most expensive one to plug.  

 

Also, the railroad tunnel is cool as well as the arched bridge under McMillan next to the I-71 ramp.  This could be a bike/running trail except they let the Frisch's Commissary take over a critical piece of the ROW for tartar sauce production:

 https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1325906,-84.4928285,3a,75y,349.81h,90.97t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sTixDf8xwWvZrGM08OPXDkQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DTixDf8xwWvZrGM08OPXDkQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D185.9242%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

On 10/30/2020 at 3:40 PM, Dev said:

Obviously it's a pipe dream at this point, but burying 71 in this section would be revolutionary.

 

To me Reading Road feels like more of a barrier because there's a solid two blocks of nothing that faces the street (I include the parking lots and berms for the old Gruen Watch and Beau Brummell buildings in that nothingness).  The cut for I-71 is comparatively narrow and the urban fabric picks up pretty quickly on both sides. 

 

Gaps like those didn't matter so much when McMillan was the city's major crosstown streetcar corridor, since you'd just ride through those sorts of areas.  Though to be fair, while McMillan and Highland was a major transfer point, it was decidedly residential, with sizeable mansions where CP is now, as well as where Christ's office is.  That's quite a contrast to Peeble's Corner, or other streetcar route crossings at Vine, Auburn, May, Ohio, and Clifton. 

 

I guess this just shows how postwar automobile-centric development patterns stopped prewar successional development in its tracks (heh) and left nothing but entropy in its wake.  The Highland Avenue corridor, despite being a cable car route that predated most other hilltop transit development, was and remains surprisingly suburban in character compared to surrounding blocks.  There's a lot of 1920s bungalows and other single-family homes that suggests wealthy holdout landowners prevented intensification of development until much later than it would otherwise have.  But that later time never came, so the mansions have mostly fallen, and only the smaller homes remain. 

1 hour ago, jjakucyk said:

 

To me Reading Road feels like more of a barrier 

 

This would be very expensive to build but I've always had the idea that the proposed Mt. Auburn tunnel could have split just north of the Christ Hospital station with a branch headed northeasterly to the Losantiville Triangle, which would be redeveloped into high-density residential/office.  I'm not sure if the park board could legally develop the Triangle but they did manage to build WH Taft across it 50 years ago (I suspect that the Triangle was part of the Hauck estate that was deeded to the park board 100~ years ago).  That branch would then continue straight up Burnet with stations at MLK and Erkenbrecker.  I've also seen the Avon Fields golf course as the juiciest redevelopment site in the city and the transit line could be built through that land.  

 

Avondale itself isn't a particularly dense neighborhood and frankly it's kind of amazing how the density of Corryville, which once maintained the density of Clifton Heights all the way to the zoo, immediately gives way to much larger lot sized north of that point, except for along Vine itself.  

 

 

 

 

 

On 10/30/2020 at 4:22 PM, jmecklenborg said:

^there are so many gaps in this area that the I-71 gap is just one more, and quite obviously, the most expensive one to plug.  

 

Also, the railroad tunnel is cool as well as the arched bridge under McMillan next to the I-71 ramp.  This could be a bike/running trail except they let the Frisch's Commissary take over a critical piece of the ROW for tartar sauce production:

 https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1325906,-84.4928285,3a,75y,349.81h,90.97t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sTixDf8xwWvZrGM08OPXDkQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DTixDf8xwWvZrGM08OPXDkQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D185.9242%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

 

 

The Sauce must flow!

 

On 11/2/2020 at 6:28 PM, jmecklenborg said:

This would be very expensive to build but I've always had the idea that the proposed Mt. Auburn tunnel could have split just north of the Christ Hospital station with a branch headed northeasterly to the Losantiville Triangle, which would be redeveloped into high-density residential/office.

 

It's a moot point when there's still much better, undeveloped empty land (like at the corner of Vine/McMillan/Calhoun)... but if we are looking at under-utilized park space, the Hollister Rec Center is a bit over 4 acres. Some of it is wooded hillside. The tennis courts have been in disrepair for years, with only one or two courts actually usable. The basketball court gets some intermittent use, but overall this is just a poorly managed space. I'd like to see this land sold, and use the proceeds to improve and better maintain Inwood Park. 

 

 

11 minutes ago, jwulsin said:

Hollister Rec Center

 

 

 

I'm sure that developers have approached the city Cranley about it.  It's a very odd piece of land.  It would be tough to create a parking access point on Vine without messing with the cue of cars that often builds down the hill toward Hollister.  There is of course the danger that a developer would want to buy out the small buildings that line this parcel.  

 

Good news for the little pocket neighborhood (does it have a name?) of Mt Auburn that is at the base of the hill that Christ Hospital sits atop. The Port is going to build a mix of market rate (6) and subsidized townhouses on Loth St. i'm glad to see the townhouses will be attached, as opposed to the 5' gap we see frequently built (due to zoning rules). The market rate townhouses will target prices in the $400,000's. 

 

https://www.bizjournals.com/cincinnati/news/2020/11/30/mixed-income-townhomes-coming-to-mount-auburn.html

 

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, jwulsin said:

Good news for the little pocket neighborhood (does it have a name?) of Mt Auburn that is at the base of the hill that Christ Hospital sits atop.

 

Little Bethlehem

 

https://handeaux.tumblr.com/post/128023263137/forgotten-but-not-gone-cincinnatis-lost-village

I run up the steps from Main to Mt Auburn and back down the steps on Eleanor a few days a month! Beautiful views from that area as well. 

 

Thanks for sharing @ryanlammi

Edited November 30, 20204 yr by Dcs3939

8 hours ago, ryanlammi said:

 

Little Bethlehem

 

https://handeaux.tumblr.com/post/128023263137/forgotten-but-not-gone-cincinnatis-lost-village

 

I didn't realize that area was quarried... but it makes sense considering how abrupt the terrain changes. It's kind of like how "Glencoe Hole" was separated by topography by everything around it. Does anybody know if others parts of the hillsides were quarried?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On January 25, the Historic Conservation Board will review a proposal from New Republic Architecture to rehabilitate 1833 Sycamore, the cool flat iron building where Sycamore intersects Auburn. Very exciting!

 

Quote

The applicant requests a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate a mixed-use structure, including the construction of a new second floor deck in the Mt Auburn Historic District. Additionally, the applicant requests conditional use approval for outdoor dining and entertainment related to location and size.

 

If anyone is interested in learning about Mt. Auburn, there is an event being held by the Mt. Auburn Community Council and CDC being hosted by local historian Greg Hand.

 

https://www.facebook.com/events/382432379729059/?active_tab=discussion

 

Pop in for a bit to hear stories about the neighborhood on Zoom. Events kicks off tonight at 7pm!

EDIT per below

2 hours ago, ryanlammi said:

If anyone is interested in learning about Mt. Auburn, there is an event being held by the Mt. Auburn Community Council and CDC being hosted by local historian and Mt. Auburn resident Greg Hand.

 

https://www.facebook.com/events/382432379729059/?active_tab=discussion

 

Pop in for a bit to hear stories about the neighborhood on Zoom. Events kicks off tonight at 7pm!

Note: Greg Hand is not a resident of Mt Auburn.

3 minutes ago, TheCOV said:

Note: Greg Hand is not a resident of Mt Auburn.

I thought he was... Not sure exactly where I heard that from. Thanks for the correction!

11 minutes ago, ryanlammi said:

I thought he was... Not sure exactly where I heard that from. Thanks for the correction!

No problem. Only reason I know is, he lives in my hood. :)

 

Anyone know what's going on at the corner of Josephine & Ringgold streets, East West of Filson Park?

1 hour ago, Cygnus said:

Anyone know what's going on at the corner of Josephine & Ringgold streets, East of Filson Park?

That's going to be the road into the garage of the Bigelow development being built by Uptown

1 hour ago, Cygnus said:

corner of Josephine & Ringgold streets, East of Filson Park?

You mean west of Filson? If so, it’s the large Uptown Rents apartment project.

^Corrected; thanks for the info.

2 hours ago, jwulsin said:

You mean west of Filson? If so, it’s the large Uptown Rents apartment project.

Does this mean they’re getting rid of that cool little forest path that connects to Walker Street?

1 hour ago, Guy23 said:

Does this mean they’re getting rid of that cool little forest path that connects to Walker Street?

 

I've been wondering about this as well.  The path is on the unimproved portion of Ringold so maybe they are paving it? My kids grew up hunting fossils and playing in those woods. Oh well, progress.

 

125 William Howard Taft Rd was just torn down. No idea what the plan is for the site. The owner also owns the adjacent medical building to the east at 199 Taft.

https://wedge.hcauditor.org/view/re/0920002014900/2020/summary

 

Photo from today, January 4th:

 

Google Streetview:

48 minutes ago, jwulsin said:

125 William Howard Taft Rd was just torn down. No idea what the plan is for the site. The owner also owns the adjacent medical building to the east at 199 Taft.

https://wedge.hcauditor.org/view/re/0920002014900/2020/summary

 

As far as I know, there were no plans to tear it down. The building caught fire a week or two ago, so this was an emergency demo after the building was completely destroyed.

54 minutes ago, jwulsin said:

 

 

The yellow building on the right was once home to a dog simply known as Roof Dog:

 

 

(I used to work for a company that was located in the Electronic Arts building across the street, which was later torn down for the 101 E Corry project.)

1 hour ago, taestell said:

 Roof Dog:

 

 

 

About 10 years ago there was a cat who reliably hung out in this window, usually with one paw leisurely hanging outside the building:

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1585152,-84.5394289,3a,15y,310.08h,97.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s9CobYTD6vh-gJehou7XymQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

 

 

Why does it feel like mt. Auburn is in this akward state of development and non development. 

 

It's squeezed between otr and uc and you would think with how much the demand has been for otr/uc, that this would be a no brainier for developers. 

 

It's smack dab next to a huge hospital (christ) with doctors and nurses that make huge salaries. 

 

You would think, logically that their would be interest in working close to home and that developers would push on this aspect..but I'm not sure why these aren't the major tenants of the housing around mt auburn, but rather extreme poverty residents who can barely make ends meet. 

 

It's rather strange and I don't really understand it. 

Edited January 4, 20214 yr by troeros

16 minutes ago, troeros said:

Why does it feel like mt. Auburn is in this akward state of development and non development. 

 

It's squeezed between otr and uc and you would think with how much the demand has been for otr/uc, that this would be a no brainier for developers. 

 

It's smack dab next to a huge hospital (christ) with doctors and nurses that make huge salaries. 

 

You would think, logically that their would be interest in working close to home and that developers would push on this aspect..but I'm not sure why these aren't the major tenants of the housing around mt auburn, but rather extreme poverty residents who can barely make ends meet. 

 

It's rather strange and I don't really understand it. 

There is the new apartment complex on Bigelow street that is getting ready to start construction but it does seem that the portion of Mt. Auburn closer to Corryville has had a lot of broken promises with development in that section such as the development that was supposed to happen at the southwest corner of East McMillan and Auburn Ave. 

1 hour ago, troeros said:

Why does it feel like mt. Auburn is in this akward state of development and non development. 

 

It's squeezed between otr and uc and you would think with how much the demand has been for otr/uc, that this would be a no brainier for developers. 

 

It's smack dab next to a huge hospital (christ) with doctors and nurses that make huge salaries. 

 

You would think, logically that their would be interest in working close to home and that developers would push on this aspect..but I'm not sure why these aren't the major tenants of the housing around mt auburn, but rather extreme poverty residents who can barely make ends meet. 

 

It's rather strange and I don't really understand it. 

 

I think lack of a business district hurts it. It's pretty hard to walk to anything interesting or fun.

1 hour ago, troeros said:

Why does it feel like mt. Auburn is in this akward state of development and non development. 

 

It's squeezed between otr and uc

It's separated from OTR and UC by difficult to walk hills and/or stroads like McMillan/Taft. 

 

The views are awesome and you see that properties with prime views (like on Pueblo) fetch million-dollar prices, but properties without views aren't nearly as valuable. 

Also the parts of Mt Auburn that you discussing are for the most parts occupied.  

14 hours ago, Traveler Joe said:

Also the parts of Mt Auburn that you discussing are for the most parts occupied.  

 

There is an amazing lack of density for a neighborhood so close to downtown though. Imagine a world where Sycamore is a dense business district and there are multi-family buildings throughout the neighborhood. Instead, it looks like this:

https://goo.gl/maps/ZsQ3YRDKmV5zYTT9A

54 minutes ago, DEPACincy said:

 

There is an amazing lack of density for a neighborhood so close to downtown though. Imagine a world where Sycamore is a dense business district and there are multi-family buildings throughout the neighborhood. Instead, it looks like this:

https://goo.gl/maps/ZsQ3YRDKmV5zYTT9A

 

The mansion on Auburncrest is still there but there were a number of others that didn't subdivide their excess land until around 1910.  When the land was subdivided it was platted as somewhat larger lots than exist in Clifton Heights.  

 

 

52 minutes ago, DEPACincy said:

 

There is an amazing lack of density for a neighborhood so close to downtown though. Imagine a world where Sycamore is a dense business district and there are multi-family buildings throughout the neighborhood. Instead, it looks like this:

https://goo.gl/maps/ZsQ3YRDKmV5zYTT9A

Do you mean Auburn Ave? Sycamore is a steep hill which would be hard to make much more dense.

 

In my opinion (and based on past studies the City and the Mt Auburn Community Council have explored), the most potential for creating a "Business district" is along Auburn Ave, immediately surrounding Christ Hospital. But even there will be a challenge since there just aren't that many residential units within walking distance (due to topography, and Christ taking up so much space). Unfortunately, it seems like Auburn Ave is going to be made wider and less hospitable to pedestrians with the coming "improvements" (the intersection of Auburn and Dorchester is going to be a curve allowing cars to move faster through that area). 

 

The new apartments on Wellington Pl are near the top of the hill, but they seem designed as a "drive-in, drive-out" style apartment, so I don't know if many residents are going to be walking along Auburn Ave that much. 

11 minutes ago, jwulsin said:

Do you mean Auburn Ave? Sycamore is a steep hill which would be hard to make much more dense.

 

Sycamore used to have row houses along its entire east side, all the way to the top of the hill.  Many of them lasted through the 1970s but were gone by 1990.  That would be a good start. 

 

Being an early wealthy neighborhood with numerous transit options (at the time) makes its lack of density puzzling.  Like Jake said, estates were subdivided into bungalow districts like you'd find in Pleasant Ridge, Westwood, or Bond Hill.  Dorchester, and Highland and Burnet north of Dorchester are prime examples.  It smells like an attempt to keep the demographics of the neighborhood more well-to-do through such things as minimum lot sizes, and possibly even minimum house sizes and construction standards.  Proto-NIMBYism basically.  The houses were juuust new enough and juuust nice enough to avoid redevelopment until it wasn't cool to live in the city anyway.

 

Another factor I think is Christ Hospital.  Urban hospitals tend to have a ring of blight around them because they buy the land for future expansion or parking, either tearing down whatever buildings are on it or maintaining them to only the minimal amount necessary.  Otherwise speculators hold onto that land hoping the hospital will buy it from them for the same purpose.  Investing in development anywhere within a hospital's line of sight is riskier than land banking. 

 

Hospitals are also so insular that they can't even seem to spawn housing for their own employees, many of which could benefit significantly from the ability to walk to work.  There's a big empty wooded lot directly across Auburn from the main entrance drive that's just sitting there.  It would be perfect for a 5 or 6 story apartment block, but Christ Hospital owns it and who knows what (if anything) they plan to do with it. 

^Also Christ attacked the little neighborhood to its south and almost nothing remained standing.  There was still a nice strip of row homes until about 2012 but there was a lot more before that.  

 

I'm not really a fan of building a station at Christ Hospital if a transit tunnel is ever built because it will be a very expensive station and there will be motivation for developers to tear down historic homes while Christ refuses to develop its surface parking lots.  

 

I'm also a little worried about the future of the nice apartment building at 2508 (I think) Auburn and the strip that faces McMillan.  They are nice historic buildings but just you watch - they'll be torn down for a big plywood apartment complex before the credit union across the street.  

1 hour ago, jwulsin said:

Do you mean Auburn Ave? Sycamore is a steep hill which would be hard to make much more dense.

 

In my opinion (and based on past studies the City and the Mt Auburn Community Council have explored), the most potential for creating a "Business district" is along Auburn Ave, immediately surrounding Christ Hospital. But even there will be a challenge since there just aren't that many residential units within walking distance (due to topography, and Christ taking up so much space). Unfortunately, it seems like Auburn Ave is going to be made wider and less hospitable to pedestrians with the coming "improvements" (the intersection of Auburn and Dorchester is going to be a curve allowing cars to move faster through that area). 

 

The new apartments on Wellington Pl are near the top of the hill, but they seem designed as a "drive-in, drive-out" style apartment, so I don't know if many residents are going to be walking along Auburn Ave that much. 

 

Yes, that was an oops on my part. I meant Auburn Avenue.

12 hours ago, DEPACincy said:

 

There is an amazing lack of density for a neighborhood so close to downtown though. Imagine a world where Sycamore is a dense business district and there are multi-family buildings throughout the neighborhood. Instead, it looks like this:

https://goo.gl/maps/ZsQ3YRDKmV5zYTT9A

 

 

I guess what I'm trying to say in that compared to OtR 20 years ago or Walnut Hills 10 years ago Mt Auburn does not have the level of abandonment that we say in those other neighborhoods.  It is for better or worse a largely working class single family neighborhood.  

 

2001 Auburn Ave is being requested to get demolished. 

 

Info in the March 8th Historic Conservation Board packet, starting on page 76: https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/buildings/historic-conservation/historic-conservation-board/march-8-2021-staff-report-and-case-materials/ 

 

The property has been landbanked by The Port, and the packet includes this statement of support from The Port for the demolition:

Quote

The development plan that St. Francis/Neyer are currently working on will create marketable street-front retail, in addition to new residential units. This will both return an unproductive location to contributing and add significant residents and businesses to Mt. Auburn. Therefore, as the current owners of 2001 Auburn Avenue, we not only support the application for its demolition, but we have agreed to be co-applicants for this Certificate of Appropriateness.

 

I'm (almost) never happy to see a building go. This one is cool, but I don't think it is crucial to the historic district like the Flatiron or the remaining mansions on Auburn Avenue.

 

I have heard the foundation is giving way in this structure, and it isn't a particularly noteworthy building. If a replacement comes along that's multi-story and contains street-level retail, this will be a good trade off in my opinion.

 

Unfortunately, they aren't proposing a replacement building with the demo request. It leads to the possibility we have a vacant lot for years.

1 hour ago, ryanlammi said:

I'm (almost) never happy to see a building go. This one is cool, but I don't think it is crucial to the historic district like the Flatiron or the remaining mansions on Auburn Avenue.

 

I have heard the foundation is giving way in this structure, and it isn't a particularly noteworthy building. If a replacement comes along that's multi-story and contains street-level retail, this will be a good trade off in my opinion.

 

Unfortunately, they aren't proposing a replacement building with the demo request. It leads to the possibility we have a vacant lot for years.

Agreed on all fronts. I'm a little bit worried that since Neyer is also involved in the flat iron redevelopment, they might use this lot for parking in the "short term" and then that just becomes the defacto long term use once people are accustomed to it being a surface lot. 

3 hours ago, ryanlammi said:

I'm (almost) never happy to see a building go. This one is cool, but I don't think it is crucial to the historic district like the Flatiron or the remaining mansions on Auburn Avenue.

 

I have heard the foundation is giving way in this structure, and it isn't a particularly noteworthy building. If a replacement comes along that's multi-story and contains street-level retail, this will be a good trade off in my opinion.

 

Unfortunately, they aren't proposing a replacement building with the demo request. It leads to the possibility we have a vacant lot for years.

They have a design, as it is required for Port property development application, but they are trying to buy out the family that owns the unused church and lots behind. Unfortunately there is fighting about ownership between the heirs. So it could be a small building to start and then build around it, or they just wait.

20 hours ago, urbangiraffe said:

They have a design, as it is required for Port property development application, but they are trying to buy out the family that owns the unused church and lots behind. Unfortunately there is fighting about ownership between the heirs. So it could be a small building to start and then build around it, or they just wait.

 

I didn't notice it the first time I skimmed through the HCB packet, but you're correct. This is from page 126 of the HCB packet:

 

On 11/5/2020 at 12:45 PM, jwulsin said:

 

It's a moot point when there's still much better, undeveloped empty land (like at the corner of Vine/McMillan/Calhoun)... but if we are looking at under-utilized park space, the Hollister Rec Center is a bit over 4 acres. Some of it is wooded hillside. The tennis courts have been in disrepair for years, with only one or two courts actually usable. The basketball court gets some intermittent use, but overall this is just a poorly managed space. I'd like to see this land sold, and use the proceeds to improve and better maintain Inwood Park.  

This was prescient. Seems to be well within the works at Uptown per this map and discussion at Park Board in February. I'd expect to see more details coming soon. Usual players involved as @jmecklenborg alluded to. 

50 minutes ago, shawk said:

This was prescient.

Thanks for the credit, but I don't know if I should be proud or sad that I saw this coming. Here's the YouTube link for the meeting... I haven't had a chance to watch it yet: 

 

The topography of that site means there is a ~70' elevation change from the high point along Auburn Ave to the level of the basketball courts on the west side of the site. Based on the video from the Park Board, it sounds like the property along Vine Street would be Park owned/managed, as part of "Inwood Park extension". I checked CAGIS to see what else Uptown owns. Everything in blue would be owned/managed by Uptown. Uptown said they don't have a site plan yet. I'm very curious to see what they propose here. It's a huge site. I hope they preserve the old mansions along Auburn Ave. They'd make cool "clubhouses" for shared amenities (assuming they decide to put apartments on the site. Has Uptown ever done anything mixed use, or are all of their projects purely residential? 

 

 

The port put out an RFP for the old Cable Building

 

"2001 Highland is approximately one-third of an acre site located at the highly visible corner of Highland and Dorchester Avenues. Although the Landbank’s preference is to solicit proposals to increase the affordable housing density in the neighborhood, all project types are welcome. The Mt. Auburn neighborhood is located just north of Over-the-Rhine and South of the Uptown neighborhoods of Clifton, Avondale and Corryville."

 

https://www.cincinnatiport.org/the-port-seeking-bids-to-redevelop-former-mt-auburn-cable-railway-site/