Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 hours ago, westerninterloper said:

This is slowly happening in Toledo too. Toledo Metroparks has been investing heavily in the city the last five years, and there are discussions about a handover of the couple of major Toledo parks. They need major investment. 

Are the Toledo Metroparks employees non-union like ours here in Cuyahoga County?   This seems to mean a difference in a huge quality gap in terms of maintenance.  

  • Replies 6.8k
  • Views 620.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • BoomerangCleRes
    BoomerangCleRes

    https://www.cleveland.com/news/2024/09/cleveland-metroparks-partners-announce-world-class-community-sailing-center-to-open-in-2026.html?outputType=amp  

  • NorthShore64
    NorthShore64

    For a MUCH more clear version of the plan, here is the recording of the special planning commission meeting from Monday (5-17-21). This wasn't published online / made available until late tonight (~10

  • Amtrak seeks $300m for Great Lakes-area stations By Ken Prendergast / April 26, 2024   Cleveland and other Northern Ohio cities would gain new, larger train stations from a program propose

Posted Images

10 hours ago, Cleburger said:

Are the Toledo Metroparks employees non-union like ours here in Cuyahoga County?   This seems to mean a difference in a huge quality gap in terms of maintenance.  

The Metroparks employees are represented by AFSCME. I don't know if the city parks employees are - can't find anything online. 

Just did survey. Interesting to note that the boulevard picture looks different from the the listening session I went to. I am pretty sure they have added a bridge over E18. 

On 12/13/2022 at 12:49 PM, Ethan said:

Just did survey. Interesting to note that the boulevard picture looks different from the the listening session I went to. I am pretty sure they have added a bridge over E18. 

 

Love the E 18th connection to the boulevard.  

  • 1 month later...

I'm originally from Cleveland but currently living in Tampa, Florida. It's crazy how much development and construction that is going on down here. Cleveland city planners need to travel outside of Ohio more because it seems like they are behind the times and need a refresher as to how development is being done around waterfronts in major cities. Water Street in DT Tampa is a great example as well as this:

https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/news/2023/01/19/ybor-harbor-darryl-shaw-plans-unveiled.html

Not a good comparison. Growing cities tend to have more resources for providing new amenities than stagnant or shrinking cities.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

8 minutes ago, KJP said:

Not a good comparison. Growing cities tend to have more resources for providing new amenities than stagnant or shrinking cities.

 

Also, the waterfront in Tampa is a year round thing.   Here, not so much, especially east of downtown.

The biggest thing separating us from them is the weather. 

12 minutes ago, E Rocc said:

 

Also, the waterfront in Tampa is a year round thing.   Here, not so much, especially east of downtown.

 

6 minutes ago, cadmen said:

The biggest thing separating us from them is the weather. 

 

True, yet other northern cities with similar weather have nicer waterfronts than Cleveland.

Of course if we wanted to we could create a much better waterfront and perhaps we will someday. But even if we decided to do that there is a big difference between a year round waterfront and a seasonal one. Its more difficult to entice development when you are limited to a few months a year. Imagine our lake and riverfront really  open year round. If you are a businessman or a developer thinking about opening something and you know you can count on 12 months of business vs. 5 or 6 that difference might be the dealbreaker. That's just reality. 

 

 

21 minutes ago, CleveFan said:

https://www.loveexploring.com/galleries/amp/93399/americas-best-waterfront-cities
 

Cleveland actually makes the list- as the article acknowledges improvements at Edgewater and bike trails and connectivity improving.  Could  a lakefront promenade elevate our waterfront  to really become a major attraction? 
 

 

Literally every city on a body of water. Cincinnati and Buffalo are on the list as well?? Yeah, no. 

Dang, we need a Ferris wheel.   

2 minutes ago, jbee1982 said:

Literally every city on a body of water. Cincinnati and Buffalo are on the list as well?? Yeah, no. 

I don't see San Diego or Baltimore on the list.

 

Edited by LibertyBlvd

5 minutes ago, LibertyBlvd said:

I don't see San Diego or Baltimore on the list.

 

It's probably because they don't feel like they need to be on the list. Cities can pay money to be on lists. It happens all the time...the buying of awards and accolades. It's nothing but a marketing scheme. 

Yeah why doesn’t somebody just start building some stuff! The issues are not complex or tied to the disintegration of the local economy! 

28 minutes ago, bumsquare said:

Yeah why doesn’t somebody just start building some stuff! The issues are not complex or tied to the disintegration of the local economy! 

 

And also it's a shame no one in Cleveland ever travels or has seen other cities before, in particular planners. If only they knew as much about development/economies as someone bold and out-there enough to move from Ohio to Florida. What a unique lifepath offering tons of insight into how those things really work. 

Edited by GrassIsGreener
added "how"

The Lakefront isn't as complicated as we've made it. It's actually simple: give some reason for people to go there and build off of that. 

 

Ingenuity Festival programmed live music and art in the warehouses there and it was amazing. Anyone who experienced it could easily imagine this growing into an ongoing thing attracting more and more people, getting more investment and making continued improvements along the way. 

 

But no, there was no traction and no leadership to run with that baton. Of course there was a bigger and better and sexier plan....allegedly. They tore down those warehouses and we continue to wait on some magical billionaire to devise some great plan. 

A preliminary peek at the survey results of the Lakefront Connector survey…

image.png.acd37e3b5d2068543f668c21b3382f58.png

 

I wish the Shoreway removal option was getting more love, but at least it’s obvious that people want the land bridge.

 

The connector study is supposed to wrap up this spring with a final recommendation by this fall.

 

Info found here from the City’s presentation to NOACA:

https://www.noaca.org/home/showpublisheddocument/29234

 

 

Edited by acd

I felt the survey didn't represent all potential options

A preliminary peek at the survey results of the Lakefront Connector survey…
image.png.acd37e3b5d2068543f668c21b3382f58.png
 
I wish the Shoreway removal option was getting more love, but at least it’s obvious that people want the land bridge.
 
The connector study is supposed to wrap up this spring with a final recommendation by this fall.
 
Info found here from the City’s presentation to NOACA:
https://www.noaca.org/home/showpublisheddocument/29234
 
 
13% wanting to maintain the status quo is crazy

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

A breakdown by respondent's zip code would be pretty telling.

17 hours ago, surfohio said:

The Lakefront isn't as complicated as we've made it. It's actually simple: give some reason for people to go there and build off of that. 

 

Ingenuity Festival programmed live music and art in the warehouses there and it was amazing. Anyone who experienced it could easily imagine this growing into an ongoing thing attracting more and more people, getting more investment and making continued improvements along the way. 

 

But no, there was no traction and no leadership to run with that baton. Of course there was a bigger and better and sexier plan....allegedly. They tore down those warehouses and we continue to wait on some magical billionaire to devise some great plan. 

An ongoing festival forever is the uncomplicated answer to developing the lakefront? 

3 hours ago, bumsquare said:

An ongoing festival forever is the uncomplicated answer to developing the lakefront? 

 

No. Betting on the regions outsized cultural talents is the spark to developing the lakefront. 

16 hours ago, Whipjacka said:

I felt the survey didn't represent all potential options

 

It was also self-selecting.

  • X locked this topic
  • 3 weeks later...

With the lakefront thread locked, this is probably the best place for this. 

 

https://www.crainscleveland.com/real-estate/cleveland-mobile-home-park-closure-will-make-way-lakefront-park-expansion

 

"The Euclid Beach Mobile Home Community on Cleveland's East Side is far too costly to maintain and should be closed to make way for a unified Euclid Creek Reservation — a lakefront green space that will rival Edgewater Park in size.

 

That's the conclusion of the Western Reserve Land Conservancy, which purchased the 28.5-acre mobile home park in December 2021 to prevent a private developer from swooping in. Representatives from the land conservancy and OHM Advisors, a planning firm, presented their findings at a public meeting late Thursday, Feb. 9, at the Collinwood Recreation Center.

 

The decision provides clarity to park residents, who have been living in limbo for more than a year. It also enables neighboring landowners, including the Cleveland Metroparks and the Cleveland Public Library, to start planning for the future of their properties."

 

I'm glad to see this continue to move forward. When complete this will be a valuable asset. 

  • X unlocked this topic
8 hours ago, Ethan said:

With the lakefront thread locked, this is probably the best place for this. 

 

https://www.crainscleveland.com/real-estate/cleveland-mobile-home-park-closure-will-make-way-lakefront-park-expansion

 

"The Euclid Beach Mobile Home Community on Cleveland's East Side is far too costly to maintain and should be closed to make way for a unified Euclid Creek Reservation — a lakefront green space that will rival Edgewater Park in size.

 

That's the conclusion of the Western Reserve Land Conservancy, which purchased the 28.5-acre mobile home park in December 2021 to prevent a private developer from swooping in. Representatives from the land conservancy and OHM Advisors, a planning firm, presented their findings at a public meeting late Thursday, Feb. 9, at the Collinwood Recreation Center.

 

The decision provides clarity to park residents, who have been living in limbo for more than a year. It also enables neighboring landowners, including the Cleveland Metroparks and the Cleveland Public Library, to start planning for the future of their properties."

 

I'm glad to see this continue to move forward. When complete this will be a valuable asset. 

 

This was a foregone conclusion.  They never had the slightest interest of doing anything else.

Is that the same group that "saved" Acacia?  At least this greenspace has some major park potential.

So I’m wondering - with the news that The Haslams want to buy 25% of the Milwaukee Bucks - what  does that tell us about their lakefront hopes/dreams/plans for Cleveland and/or their plans for a new Cleveland football stadium?   

36 minutes ago, CleveFan said:

So I’m wondering - with the news that The Haslams want to buy 25% of the Milwaukee Bucks - what  does that tell us about their lakefront hopes/dreams/plans for Cleveland and/or their plans for a new Cleveland football stadium?   


Investing in sports teams provides a much better ROI to the investor than…lakefront development plans.  Or new stadiums. So I don’t think that is the motivation for their plans in a Cleveland vis-a-vis the lakefront.  
 

I would imagine these are completely different purposes and one isn’t being done at the expense of the other. 

2 hours ago, CleveFan said:

So I’m wondering - with the news that The Haslams want to buy 25% of the Milwaukee Bucks - what  does that tell us about their lakefront hopes/dreams/plans for Cleveland and/or their plans for a new Cleveland football stadium?   

 

Nothing 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

In a perfect world the Haslams would be using that money to help with the financials of a new Browns stadium. Instead (because it makes more financial sense for them) us locals will foot more of the bill for that stadium. 

 

Yeah it's not a perfect world. And that's how the rich get richer.

Or, they think they can use real estate development to help finance the cost of a new stadium.

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

That sounds like the best case win-win scenario but also  like a  complicated  dance to choreograph - financing and logistical preparation for a new stadium while the land with the existing one is sold and transformed. 

I can't imagine Ronayne's predecessor saying this

 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

So maybe chances of Amtrak returning to Tower City are a little better now.

2 hours ago, Whipjacka said:

litt really running PR for the conservatory on this Euclid Beach Park mobile home issue. odd position for a guy that talks about the evils of displacement in every other article he writes.  

https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/02/western-reserve-land-conservancy-showing-guts-in-leading-community-effort-to-turn-mobile-home-park-into-lakefront-park.html


Doesn’t read like PR to me. I agree with his assessment. 

  • 2 weeks later...

First-Energy-Stadium4.jpg

 

Sources: Browns want new stadium; Mayor wants community input

By Ken Prendergast / February 27, 2023

 

According to several sources, the Cleveland Browns and its majority owner, the Haslam Sports Group, want to move faster than City Hall on what happens before the team’s lease at FirstEnergy Stadium expires at the end of 2028. That reportedly includes a new football/multi-purpose stadium and supportive development in downtown Cleveland.

 

MORE:

https://neo-trans.blog/2023/02/27/sources-browns-want-new-stadium-mayor-wants-community-input/

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Hey! It’s…..basically good news!

8 minutes ago, LlamaLawyer said:

Hey! It’s…..basically good news!

Yeah, I’m failing to see what all the worry was about this morning. Maybe I’m not reading between the lines?

 

2 minutes ago, Henke said:

Yeah, I’m failing to see what all the worry was about this morning. Maybe I’m not reading between the lines?

I think that was someone else riding Ken’s tweet and using it to collect views/attention. I didn’t read anything in his actual Tweets that implied it was negative, although that’s what I inferred based on everything else that was on Twitter. 

Its nowhere near as bad as billed IMO. Feels like theres some bureaucracy sure but also sounds like just sifting through the process of trying to work out a plan which wasn't going to happen overnight.

15 minutes ago, snakebite said:

Its nowhere near as bad as billed IMO. Feels like theres some bureaucracy sure but also sounds like just sifting through the process of trying to work out a plan which wasn't going to happen overnight.

Seems like everyone is doing the right thing. Haslam wants a new stadium DOWNTOWN asap. Bibb wants to make sure the city doesn’t get screwed over too much. There’s still a lot that can go wrong, but this is pretty appropriate positioning for a negotiation.

The Haslams can build at their own expense whatever they want.

Also, one question I have that wasn’t necessarily addressed in the article (or perhaps I overlooked it),

 

If the Browns decide to build a new stadium near the area that KJP discussed, what does that mean for the lakefront development? Would Haslam/the city still go through with it?

I think it’s great news.  It’s the worst kept secret in the world that the Haslams want a new stadium - the timetable just got accelerated.  This is their “move”, probably in their best hopes to align with a Super Bowl contender with the career of Deshaun Watson as the lynch pin. 
 

IMO, the area @KJP referenced in his article - between East 13th and East 17th is the perfect choice for the future of the city. 
1) Energize and connect to downtown 

2) supercharge development in that district on the edge of downtown 

3) Open the lakefront and 20 new acres for development, lifestyle and possible new attractions

 

And to those that dismiss the Browns as unnecessary to the future of the city - it’s a selfish perspective, to my thinking.  Economics are what they are in 2023. But football  is The American pastime and I want the new and next generations of Clevelanders to have a hometown team. there were once some great times being a Browns fan and that excitement can return - fans here have been so loyal and deserve a team in a competitive facility. 
.

Granted, The team has been abysmal for years - but  a competitive team might be finally at hand - I hope.  

 

It’s time to  join the 21st century and make this a year round facility that hosts many events - not 10 or 11 games.  
 

Think of what this town could be like in a decade with a modern stadium  with easy access to downtown businesses - and a beautiful lakefront open for developing. 
 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.