Posted June 9, 200520 yr Great food for thought on the future of Dike 14, just north of MLK and Gordon Park on Cleveland's East Side... http://www.wcpn.org/news/2005/04_06/0610dike14.html Movement on Dike 14 Aired June 10, 2005 For years local bird-watching, conservation and environmental education groups have been clamoring for public access to Dike 14, a contained disposal facility for polluted sediments dredged from the Cuyahoga River near Gordon State Park. Now it looks like they’re finally going to get it. But as the city of Cleveland moves ahead with implementing its lakefront master plan for the 88-acre site, questions about the risks to humans and wildlife remain. ideastream's Karen Schaefer has the report. http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y44/cbongorno/Dike14View.jpg also check out: http://www.balancedlivingmag.com/2005/January%20-%20February%202005/Dike%2014.htm
March 27, 200619 yr Please move this if the topic already exists! Via the relaunched (and technically superior) version of greencitybluelake http://www.gcbl.org/planning/lakefront/dike-14 The city has released a masterplan for the 88 acre cuyahoga river dredge disposal site, Dike 14. Check it out at http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/lakefront/dike14.html This project has amazing potential for a city lacking "wild" natural spaces. It could certainly be a great exposure to nature for all the students in Glenville, let alone the rest of the city. Most inner city kids have little or no contact with wild lands. While to a small degree manicured, this masterplan seems to do a great job of letting the land tell the story. Hopefully this will signal a new willingness by Cleveland's Planning Commission to post relevant planning info online.
March 29, 200619 yr Hopefully this will signal a new willingness by Cleveland's Planning Commission to post relevant planning info online. Amen to that! The summary and map are great. I knew very little about this project and I came away feeling pretty up-to-speed. This is a very exciting project and one that should bring us better access to our lakefront and nature in general, while continuing the expansion of our bike/ped trails.
June 5, 200619 yr How nice would a combined Gordon Park and Dike 14 be if the shoreway did not dissect the two?? Cleveland needs a Big Dig!
June 5, 200619 yr paul, nice shot. how did you get access to it? Thanks! Actually, I took the photo on approach to Hopkins while returning from a biz trip to Kansas City last month. some more photos of downtown from that same landing approach are here: http://www.urbanohio.com/forum2/index.php?topic=9142.0
May 6, 200718 yr Anyone go to this today. I went last year, but missed this one. Former landfill hosts wildlife in urban setting Public invited to observe Dike 14's transformation Saturday, May 05, 2007 Tom Breckenridge Plain Dealer Reporter How could something so nasty be so glorious? Article Removed
May 6, 200718 yr It would be great to see a feasibility study for re establishing natural sand beaches along that stretch of coastline.
May 6, 200718 yr ^^^I don't think the missle silos are in the Dike 14 area. Aren't they somewhere else? ^^I study was done done. You can't "re" establish something that was not there. But there was talk some time ago about creating a new beach along the dike... $$$$ ^I was surprised about the ships too. That's crazy. It would interesting to get some ground penetrating radar to take some images of the dike.
May 8, 200718 yr Musky, I mean "re establish" in a broader sense, since before so called "improvements" most of the city had wide sandy beaches. p.s. my friend in Baltimore is the one who did the study- I just found this out and you're right about $$$$. But I think if someone could calculate just how much beach erosion and sand loss have adversely affected the economy, it could show good reason for future investment.
May 8, 200718 yr Understood. But I do not think that portion of the city ever had much in the way of beaches. I'll look around at some of my old maps. Does your friend work at Biohabitats, Inc? They were the consultants that did the last planning study for the dike in 2005 along with Kerr + Boron Associates, DLZ, Consultating Engineers, Hull and Associates, and KS Associates. See below: However, Cleveland's Waterfront Plan does call for beaches near the dike. (see below) Again, that is many dollars away from being reality.
December 1, 200717 yr cleveland.com: Meetings on Dike 14 pollution review are Wednesday, Thursday Posted by Wally Guenther November 30, 2007 21:11PM Categories: Breaking News, FYI Article Removed
December 1, 200717 yr There is hardly any contamination on the Dike (I've seen the studies). They will build one simple all-purpose track on the island that will go to the western "beak". There might be some other dirt paths. The idea is to keep the entire place like a prairie so that the birds will continue to flock to the place.
December 4, 200717 yr yay for the new beach. it all looks good. whats the timeline for this part of the waterfront plan to be completed? thx.
December 4, 200717 yr aside from the whole schmear, i meant just for the dike part area. has that been determined? also, is there any money being arranged to do this $4.6m park yet? very exciting if they can git'r done.
December 4, 200717 yr There is hardly any contamination on the Dike (I've seen the studies). They will build one simple all-purpose track on the island that will go to the western "beak". There might be some other dirt paths. The idea is to keep the entire place like a prairie so that the birds will continue to flock to the place. Um, guys, the beach and all that stuff is not going to happen. The one simple multipurpose trail is the only thing that is being planned. The idea is to keep it natural.
December 4, 200717 yr Dike 14 has seemed like a waste from the start in my opinion. Why add land to your shoreline just to turn it into a grassy meadow. In my mind this project is a bust whether it happens or not.
December 4, 200717 yr ^The dike was not designed as a public amenity, it was a dumping place for the dredgings from the mighty [shallow] Cuyahoga. The new park is just an incidental amenity, which sounds pretty cool to me. There isn't very much natural shoreline left, certainly not in the city, so it should be a pretty unique spot. Ironic that we only have it because we built it.
December 4, 200717 yr ^^It was never a project. The Army Corps of Engineers had to dump the dredgings somewhere, so they decided to put it there. Its not like they dredged the river just so they could add some acreage to the shoreline.
December 12, 200717 yr The Dike 14 Nature Preserve was never planned for recreational uses as was stated before. The dredging from the Cuyahoga River and the Cleveland port were deposited on this site. This happened after they found that the dredging were contaminated and could no longer just dump them in open water. They constructed this dike to keep the water clean, do you still think that it is a waist of money now. Once the dike was completed nature took over the site. No many species of mammals and birds call this place home. With Cleveland sprawling more and more every year The Animal need some where to go and they have called Dike 14 their home for now. I think we need some where for nature to exist undisturbed, unfortunately we don't have enough real estate on the lake in proximity to downtown but I think the dike should stay undeveloped as a nature preserve.
December 12, 200717 yr Nature did not take over completely. The Dike was seeded with many of the plants that thrive there now. I use to have pictures of the dike before there was any plant life on it, but cannot find them now. I agree, an abundance of the current plant life has grown due in part by birds, wind and so on, but it was not entirely Mother Nature taking back what rightly belongs to her.
Create an account or sign in to comment