2 minutes ago, Robuu said:

One might argue that air gaps over a highway have a greater deadening effect than surface parking lots.

 

I never said we should not cap the highway. Just suggesting we shouldn't be proposing massive developments on top of the caps until demand is there.

Someone on here I'm sure knows exactly but I remember reading that these caps could only support buildings that are 4-6 floors.  So it wouldn't be massive developments on these blocks.  Not to mention these would be city or county owned land I assume.  It's a lot harder to get private owners of parking lots to give up that revenue stream for development.  The city has already been slowly selling off or giving up some of the land they own downtown for development in recent years. 

The city could also change the tax structure so they are charged a higher per month / per day rate or a higher property tax rate to encourage redevelopment.

 

We're already seeing some parking lots being redeveloped. The Pendleton site, Kroger site, small lot at Race/Garfield (I think this is going forward, right?), Cincinnati Public Radio just north of City Hall.

Development at the Banks has basically come to a Halt.  I know there is all the talk about a music venue, and a proposal for phase 3.   But hard reality is that Phase 3 of the Banks has been sitting there ready for development for a couple years now, and nothing.  If we can't even get something built on phase 3, which is "shovel ready", I don't see us ever getting these caps built and something developed on them.   There obviously isn't enough demand for that right now.

2 minutes ago, ryanlammi said:

The city could also change the tax structure so they are charged a higher per month / per day rate or a higher property tax rate to encourage redevelopment.

 

We're already seeing some parking lots being redeveloped. The Pendleton site, Kroger site, small lot at Race/Garfield (I think this is going forward, right?), Cincinnati PUblic Radio just north of City Hall.

Race and Garfield is on indefinite hold. One of the many stalled projects that did Glaserworks in this past year. 

24 minutes ago, ryanlammi said:

The city could also change the tax structure so they are charged a higher per month / per day rate or a higher property tax rate to encourage redevelopment.

 

We're already seeing some parking lots being redeveloped. The Pendleton site, Kroger site, small lot at Race/Garfield (I think this is going forward, right?), Cincinnati Public Radio just north of City Hall.

 

 

If the goal is simply to cap the interstate, putting small institutions on caps like Cincinnati Public Radio would be one way to do it. 

 

Large buildings such as 100-unit apartment buildings are unrealistic given the lack of parking and the inability to economically build parking garages on the caps. 

 

5 hours ago, ucgrady said:

One thing that most of these proposals have is a lagoon/pool area down by the riverfront. I think getting a lagoon or the originally designed boat dock would be crucial to finishing the already great riverfront park. 

 

One thing I like as a thought moving forward is from MIT's submission. They show the caps mostly as buildings, but with a park space that runs North/South adjacent to the Freedom Center. I think if you place the caps with a park running East/West it will still keep the banks and downtown just as divided as they are now, but if you aligned the park space North/South as shown by MIT it would connect through the banks to downtown instead of separating the two. I think it would make sense to place it on the Vine street side, not Walnut as they show, since their plan would require demolishing Yard House. Also Vine street is a more prominent street for Cincinnati, and the park could terminate at the carousel. 

 

 

Keep in mind that this proposal could not be built without major infrastructure work. The supports that were installed when FWW was built will only support buildings on the two full blocks between Race and Walnut, plus 1/2 block west of Race and 1/2 block west of Walnut. Some of the other proposals reflected this. Also, if I recall correctly, the caps would only be able to front Second and Third street, and there would have to be gaps between the caps and the Race/Vine/Walnut overpasses. This is to prevent it from being classified as a tunnel, which would require expensive ventilation to be installed.

Also, there must be physical gaps between the overpasses and the caps or else the whole thing qualifies as a "tunnel". 

 

These grad students mowed over pesky details like a Musk or a Trump or a Theranos. 

I believe the magic number is 800' long to require ventilation per NFPA 502. As much as I wish we could cover the whole thing and pay for a huge ventilation system, I think the realistic option is to cap the whole block between Vine and Walnut with a park/festival space and book-end the other sides with restaurant/office the scale of 15th and Vine (which is small enough to build on spec). If you could then re-develop the garages on either side of Great American, and build the Banks office building you would be looking at a great gathering space to complement Fountain Square to host major events. 

 

 

 

The piles were not driven to the edge of the overpasses.  There is a 10~ foot gap between the east edge of the Race St. overpass and where the piles were driven, then another between the piles and the west side of the Vine St. overpass.  That pattern repeated for the cap between Vine and Walnut.  Piles were driven for "half" caps to the west of the Race St. overpass and another east of the Walnut St. overpass.  The two overpasses with the fake cable-stayed towers have no piles near them. 

 

I'm not an engineer so I don't know what the actual textbook regulation is - I'm going by my recollection of news articles from that time, along with photos I took of the piles being installed. 

 

Also, rows of piles were driven on the north side of the sloping trench wall and on the south side of that same wall, between the slope and the actual flood wall, which is straight up-and-down.  I don't know why the south and north lines of piles were needed at the time, but they're there.  I'm also skeptical as to how much of a disruption was avoided by sinking the center median piles during construction of the highway.  By my recollection, it didn't take very long, maybe 2-3 weeks to install everything. 

 

 

 

 

 

I have no other comments on the length of a tunnel and the ventilation requirements except if they did cap the entire blocks between race and walnut, the distance would cover just over 1000 feet (from the exterior edges of each street). Roughly 1030 feet of tunnel according to Google maps.

32 minutes ago, jmecklenborg said:

The piles were not driven to the edge of the overpasses.  There is a 10~ foot gap between the east edge of the Race St. overpass and where the piles were driven, then another between the piles and the west side of the Vine St. overpass.  That pattern repeated for the cap between Vine and Walnut.  Piles were driven for "half" caps to the west of the Race St. overpass and another east of the Walnut St. overpass.  The two overpasses with the fake cable-stayed towers have no piles near them. 

 

I'm not an engineer so I don't know what the actual textbook regulation is - I'm going by my recollection of news articles from that time, along with photos I took of the piles being installed. 

 

Also, rows of piles were driven on the north side of the sloping trench wall and on the south side of that same wall, between the slope and the actual flood wall, which is straight up-and-down.  I don't know why the south and north lines of piles were needed at the time, but they're there.  I'm also skeptical as to how much of a disruption was avoided by sinking the center median piles during construction of the highway.  By my recollection, it didn't take very long, maybe 2-3 weeks to install everything. 

 

 

 

 

 

OT but I want to check out Cincinnati-transit.net and it's gone. What happened?

Edited March 18, 20196 yr by Rabbit Hash

1 hour ago, Rabbit Hash said:

OT but I want to check out Cincinnati-transit.net and it's gone. What happened?

 

I let it expire.  I have everything saved, though.  I'm going to do a new website after I scan all of my old slides and negatives, which is going to be a multi-week project.  All of those photos on there were scans from 4x6 prints from Walgreen's or wherever but scans from negatives will look a lot better. 

17 hours ago, jmecklenborg said:

 

I let it expire.  I have everything saved, though.  I'm going to do a new website after I scan all of my old slides and negatives, which is going to be a multi-week project.  All of those photos on there were scans from 4x6 prints from Walgreen's or wherever but scans from negatives will look a lot better. 

 

Oh wow, I was going to reference it for my cities skylines project to get subway related stuff down (though your book is generally an even better resource).

1 hour ago, neilworms said:

 

Oh wow, I was going to reference it for my cities skylines project to get subway related stuff down (though your book is generally an even better resource).

I have a huge stack of materials that I need to take to a bulk scanner.  It's like 20" high of photocopies of news articles and other stuff.  Doing it one page at a time would take a month. 

From this article: Portune, Cranley strike a deal on developing the rest of the Banks

 

• The city and county will work together on options to place decks over Fort Washington Way.

6 minutes ago, Cygnus said:

From this article: Portune, Cranley strike a deal on developing the rest of the Banks

 

• The city and county will work together on options to place decks over Fort Washington Way.

 

This is promising but I wish there was an actual time table discussed. I feel like capping Fort Washington way has been discussed for years now 

It has been. For good reason. It's a huge undertaking and the reality is that its specifics really depended on the long-term successes and failures of The Banks.

 

I'm nervous it's going to wind up being parks. Not that I dislike parks, but it won't do a good job of bridging the gap and will detract from the world class park on the riverfront that is already fairly huge for the population it serves. There should be a strong push to build out buildings on the caps.

I'd be fine if one of the caps became a park.  The one right behind the Freedom Center would make sense since the land infront of it isn't fully developed.  It would be great for Oktoberfest and other festivals.  But yeah not all of them should be parks, put some development on them that will hopefully help slow down traffic on 2nd and 3rd.  

The biannual argument about whether the caps should have buildings or not.

 

I've stated this before, but I'm all for open public spaces for the most part. 

Buildings on stilts with public plaza space below. An open lawn in front of the Freedom Center. Narrow 2nd and 3rd Streets.

Something I've never seen before is the initial report on the caps in 2001. Reading through it now.

https://www.cincinnati-oh.gov/cityofcincinnati/cache/file/9148C2EF-5E8E-4B78-8CE048D8A58E1E6C.pdf

According to this document, the only way to get anything built up straight to Vine Street is to abandon the caps west of race and east of Walnut. Every other alternative showed 25' wide slots along each North/South street due to the definition of "tunnel".

 

Not sure if anything has changed since they evaluated these options 18 years ago.

I wonder if they'll have public input on whether to do buildings vs park. Really hope its not just an assumption that itll be parks

Parks atop FWW would be virtually unusable - there would still be significant highway noise from the adjacent blocks, there would be a lack of shade for several years (if not indefintely - I'm not sure how big trees can get atop a highway cap), 2nd and 3rd Streets would still be among the worst downtown streets for pedestrians to cross, and there's a far better park a block to the south - and a better square a block to the north. In my opinion, it's not worth the effort without some sort of building - even if it's something like a two story restaurant/bar/roof deck.

It seems like parks would be most usable if the Race St. and Walnut St. bridges were included in the park space too... limiting traffic across FWW to Elm, Vine or Main. 

 

It'd require conversion of all of those to 2-way streets, and to make it better maybe the Streetcar track could be taken off the Main St. bridge and go on the Race and Walnut St. bridges only.

1 hour ago, Ram23 said:

Parks atop FWW would be virtually unusable - there would still be significant highway noise from the adjacent blocks, there would be a lack of shade for several years (if not indefintely - I'm not sure how big trees can get atop a highway cap), 2nd and 3rd Streets would still be among the worst downtown streets for pedestrians to cross, and there's a far better park a block to the south - and a better square a block to the north. In my opinion, it's not worth the effort without some sort of building - even if it's something like a two story restaurant/bar/roof deck.

 

Interesting question about the trees. This is a circa 2009 photo (and it's super low resolution and doesn't show much detail), but if you look at the circle—those boxes hold the soil for the planters/trees along that stretch of road at The Banks. I imagine, since The Banks actually sit above a massive garage, that this kind of construction limits the tree's growth/lifespan. I would think FWW decks would be similar? 

 

I agree, the spaces above need to be usable and I worry that if they were to install park space or green space—would someone be opposed the second that someone wants to build on them? Which begs the question: would anyone want to build on these decks? I.E. Is there enough potential in open downtown surface lots, redevelopment space, and the rest of The Banks that more space isn't even needed at this time?

Edited November 7, 20195 yr by Gordon Bombay

 

Could always do what Columbus did and put single story restaurants/shops lining the street. Then put greenspace behind the stores (columbus doesn't have that)

1 hour ago, Ram23 said:

Parks atop FWW would be virtually unusable - there would still be significant highway noise from the adjacent blocks, there would be a lack of shade for several years (if not indefintely - I'm not sure how big trees can get atop a highway cap), 2nd and 3rd Streets would still be among the worst downtown streets for pedestrians to cross, and there's a far better park a block to the south - and a better square a block to the north. In my opinion, it's not worth the effort without some sort of building - even if it's something like a two story restaurant/bar/roof deck.

 

Dallas did this to their own FWW and it's always active (I see it every year):

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klyde_Warren_Park

An outrageous unique sculpture that creates wind and noise breaks. Plus, creates shade and shelter for the public would be a great solution. Like St. Lou Arch, or the space needle in Seattle or this wood construction in Seville, Parasol.

 

Edited November 7, 20195 yr by RJohnson
better photo

That park in Dallas looks like a good example to see how Dallas was able to get 1220 feet of tunnel without any obvious openings (vents or slots adjacent to streets).

 

The total length of tunnel in Cincinnati (if it followed a similar design to Dallas with no obvious openings):

As shown above with 25' wide slots along Race/Walnut but built up to Vine: 770 Feet
West side of Race to east side of Walnut: 1035 Feet
All 4 Caps going to midblock past Race and Walnut: 1425 Feet

 

It should definitely be evaluated whether this can happen.

 

I would be thrilled with an option that includes all 4 caps built up to the North/South streets for a continuous tunnel that has buildings on the half-sized caps on the ends and open space on the two large caps in the middle.

My view, whether it is perfect or not, is that it would be really good to get this done whether it's parks or buildings. I thought I had read sometime they could do up to 4 stories on them, that would be a huge difference in and of itself, to bridge that gap.

 

I only wonder if they would first want to build out the rest of the banks then go to this, but if the City is taking control of some of the lots they can push to get development going on those lots while at the same time getting the caps figured out.

 

I think then too they would need to figure out ways to calm the traffic on 3rd and 2nd street or whatever they call those streets now.

^It can hold up to 4 stories according to the original report I linked earlier.

 

I also think the city/county can do two things at the same time. They should figure out their plan, and then apply for federal funds every cycle until they get what they need to complete the project. A lot of this will likely be paid for with outside funding, so we might as well be trying to do this now instead of sitting on it for another decade..

^ I agree, they should be pushing for this with federal grants at every turn and even if nothing gets built on them right away, at least then they are in place to move forward with development.

 

It really is a big psychological barrier to the rest of downtown going over a bridge. With all the development going on 4th Street it will really help connect Fountain Square to the Banks.

 

There are some deadzones between all the development just going from the Banks to OTR up Vine/Race:

 

Starting from the Banks: Fort Washington Way, some spots between Fountain Square and 4th Street (though improving quickly), then from 6th/7th street up to Court. The biggest challenge will obviously be the space between 6th/7th/8th up to Court/Central Parkway, but if they can get the caps on it will make up a ton of space and ultimately I believe help 4th Street and 3rd Street development be that much more successful that much more quickly.

 

People who decide to live on 4th Street then hopefully more development on 3rd street will be that much more attracted with perceived easier access to the Banks or more pleasant access than what is there currently. It will be a Win/Win/Win

I just came here from looking at all the posts on The Banks thread and this really really needs to happen for Cincinnati. The Dallas linear park and the High Street Cap that were mentioned are good examples. A combo of both would be great. Cincinnati really needs to do this-it seems like a no brainer to me. Is it kind of so obvious that it is overlooked?-sort of like how Columbus was fine with the Scioto River downtown being a sewage sedimentation pond until they finally took down the low head damn and have a free flowing river with many acres of greenspace along it. All I can think is why did we wait so long-it seems like that here... it is just so obvious to me looking at it as an outsider anyway.

If I can overgeneralize a bit, I think Greater Cincinnati tends to do a good job with major transformative projects but doesn't tend to do a good job with all the little implementation details that follow. In this case I think Cincinnati/Hamilton County did an incredible job with the rebuild of FWW, which was a bit ahead of its time and obviously laid the groundwork for the stadiums, Smale Park, and the Freedom Center. However there were many other forward-thinking ideas adjacent to the FWW rebuild, and many of them struggled because after the initial rah-rah spirit wore off, there was no one left to advocate for them. The Banks has moved at a snails pace and we've now decided to disband the joint city-county Steering Committee and just divide up the remaining parcels for the city and county to develop separately. The Riverfront Transit Center has been used for many things over the years but was only used to its full potential for the first time this year during BLINK, nearly two decades after it was completed. And even then, many City and Chamber leaders were fighting against the RTC being used, but fortunately Metro kept pushing them on it and eventually won that battle. The FWW caps are a similar thing -- there is just nobody who really cares that much about them and is making an effort to push the idea forward and make it a top priority. If the city made it clear that capping FWW is a major priority and was out there applying for every federal grant that could fund them, or lobbying the state to include funding for the caps in the next transportation bill, they may have been built by now.

From Cleveland:

 

https://www.wkyc.com/mobile/article/news/local/cleveland/developer-released-plans-for-outlet-mall-on-cleveland-lakefront-city-officials-saying-no-thanks/95-8fa1623b-b740-4f34-b3ed-398010d75fe5

 

I’ve mentioned this before but I think an outlet mall may be a “so crazy it just might work” good use of the Ft Washington Way caps.

 

I say this primarily because any structure built over the highway should be simple and utilitarian in nature, to avoid long term maintenance nightmares. 1 story retail (with street-facing entrances of course, unlike the rendering shown on the article) would fit the bill. 

Plus you would provide synergies with entertainment at the Banks, possible increase in Hamilton Co. parking garage revenues and nearby jobs for urban core residents. 
 

The risk would be how long it would take to recoup the massive up front investment in the caps

Edited February 24, 20205 yr by thebillshark

On 11/6/2019 at 9:31 PM, seaswan said:

 

Could always do what Columbus did and put single story restaurants/shops lining the street. Then put greenspace behind the stores (columbus doesn't have that)

Start with this facing Walnut

5 hours ago, thebillshark said:

From Cleveland:

 

https://www.wkyc.com/mobile/article/news/local/cleveland/developer-released-plans-for-outlet-mall-on-cleveland-lakefront-city-officials-saying-no-thanks/95-8fa1623b-b740-4f34-b3ed-398010d75fe5

 

I’ve mentioned this before but I think an outlet mall may be a “so crazy it just might work” good use of the Ft Washington Way caps.

 

I say this primarily because any structure built over the highway should be simple and utilitarian in nature, to avoid long term maintenance nightmares. 1 story retail (with street-facing entrances of course, unlike the rendering shown on the article) would fit the bill. 

Plus you would provide synergies with entertainment at the Banks, possible increase in Hamilton Co. parking garage revenues and nearby jobs for urban core residents. 
 

The risk would be how long it would take to recoup the massive up front investment in the caps

 

It'd be fine as long as it included 3 stories of residential above. We have to maximize the land use there and add residential density. Provide the retailers with a built in customer base. 

53 minutes ago, DEPACincy said:

 

It'd be fine as long as it included 3 stories of residential above. We have to maximize the land use there and add residential density. Provide the retailers with a built in customer base. 

 

While I like that idea, there are some challenges to doing residential on that spot. 

1) Parking to justify the cost of residential there, unless you build a garage above ground. However, there is plenty of parking nearby so it is not likely a huge issue.

2) The other issue I see and think it is a bigger issue is whether units directly above the highway will command the premium it takes to build them. Will people be annoyed if their unit overlooks the highway and is subject to the highway noise. It is a bit different than the Radius which is set back a bit from the highway.

2 hours ago, Brutus_buckeye said:

 

While I like that idea, there are some challenges to doing residential on that spot. 

1) Parking to justify the cost of residential there, unless you build a garage above ground. However, there is plenty of parking nearby so it is not likely a huge issue.

2) The other issue I see and think it is a bigger issue is whether units directly above the highway will command the premium it takes to build them. Will people be annoyed if their unit overlooks the highway and is subject to the highway noise. It is a bit different than the Radius which is set back a bit from the highway.

 

Like you said, tons of parking nearby. And they are building 8th and Main with no parking, so I don't think this will be an issue. As for views, most units would face 2nd, 3rd, or Vine Street. Units facing Race or Walnut would have the highway across the street but that's the current situation at Radius, Current, and City Club so I don't see it as a deterrent either. I think there are also sketches floating around of mini parks to the west of Race and east of Walnut on half-caps. Those would help soften the highway noise. You'd put the four story buildings on the center caps between Race and Walnut.

4 hours ago, DEPACincy said:

 

It'd be fine as long as it included 3 stories of residential above. We have to maximize the land use there and add residential density. Provide the retailers with a built in customer base. 

This is contrary to the main reason for my somewhat off the wall suggestion of an outlet mall in the first place. I’m saying any one story structure would be easier (less cost and risk) to maintain, renovate/repurpose or even demolish over a time span of decades than a more complex structure. I’m assuming those things would be more difficult to do (perhaps only slightly, but perhaps much more so) for a building suspended over a highway than one on ordinary ground. In the absence of an “Amazon HQ-2” style increase in demand for real estate in downtown Cincinnati, we should consider a simpler structure if the numbers at all pencil out. 

Edited February 24, 20205 yr by thebillshark

Interstate highway-style changeable message sign being installed on ... Third Street? Is this really necessary?

 

 

2 hours ago, taestell said:

Interstate highway-style changeable message sign being installed on ... Third Street? Is this really necessary?

 

 

 

 

Those are some ugly signs. 

My only thought is that these signs can be used the few times per year that traffic is not allowed on 3rd street like Oktoberfest and Taste of Cincy, assuming that the Banks/Ft.Washington Way continues to act as the city's festival streets (especially if the caps ever are built). It will also probably be used for Red's games, Bengal's games and concerts. Other than events I can't think of why these would be necessary. Maybe the police got sick of dragging out the move-able signage usually used for construction work. 

I just think it sets a bad precedent. When you install highway-scaled signage and lighting on city streets, it makes those streets feel like a highway, and drivers treat it as such. We should be doing the opposite and making these streets feel more pedestrian-scaled. That's the whole point of installing the caps (whether they are topped with a park or buildings).

There's been a small version of one of those signs on the Norwood Lateral at Paddock Road for over 10 years https://goo.gl/maps/MknV4xtuYnfFT9xm8  I've never seen a message on it, nor do I know what could even fit on it.  If you go back to the July 2012 view you can see the cover panel had popped off and was flapping in the wind.  It was like that for a long time too.  It was replaced in 2015-2018 but I've still yet to see it actually display anything.  

They also installed one on westbound Columbia Parkway, just before the Martin Dr. bridge.

Another at the end of the 6th st viaduct near Evans street. It messed up traffic for weeks when they cut the wall to put the base in so i hope the upper part is installed quickly.

 

It'll be nice having the crappy jokes from ODOT's twitter feed right in the heart of the city, near the sports parks.

"Don't FUMBLE, get a designated driver."

 

"Buckling up is a HOME RUN."

Edited May 11, 20205 yr by Gordon Bombay