Jump to content

Featured Replies

With 10 of 173 precincts reporting:

 

No 8,346 50.5%

 

Yes 8,193 49.5%

 

... I'd sure love to know which precincts those are.

  • Replies 32.3k
  • Views 1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • January is normally the lowest ridership month for the Cincinnati Streetcar.    In January 2023, the streetcar had higher ridership than any month in 2017, 2018, 2020 or 2021. It also had hi

  • As of today, the Connector has carried 1 million riders in 2023. This is the first time that the system has crossed this threshold in a calendar year.   Back when the streetcar was being deb

  • 30 minutes ago I got off the most jam-packed streetcar that I had been on since opening weekend.     It's absurd that none of the elected officials in this city are using this rec

Posted Images

With 38 of 173 reporting:

 

No 11,892 50.9%

 

Yes 11,465 49.1%

38 of 173 Precincts Reporting:

 

 

No

 

11,892

 

50.9%

 

Yes

 

11,465

 

49.1%

 

 

Damn, its close....but still very early

@917wvxu just tweeted:

 

"Council top 9 with 151 precincts counted: Qualls, Thomas, Young, Winburn, Sittenfeld, Simpson, Quinlivan, Smitherman and Seelbach."

 

If that many precincts have been counted, we may know something soon.

That can't be right... there's still only 38 counted on the HamCo BOE site.

Yea, I'm confused by that too. But if true, that's a 6-3 pro-streetcar majority for council.

with 1 of the 3 the "against" being Sittenfeld... who will be "for" it if 48 fails... lol

We're still at around 21% precincts reporting

 

With 88 of 173:

 

 

No 20,499 51.4%

 

Yes 19,405 48.6%

 

 

Pulling ahead...

88 of 173 reporting

 

 

No

 

20,499

 

51.4%

 

Yes

 

19,405

 

48.6%

 

Please tell me the west side has already reported.

Please tell me the west side has already reported.

 

im from the westside and currently go to xavier.  that made me laugh though haha.  i understand what you mean haha.

^I was wondering the exact same thing! It's looking pretty good so far, but if the majority of the west side hasn't reported yet.....

They are saying on the city live feed that at this point most of the democratic votes are typically in (we're at 50% precincts).  This means with numbers this close, Issue 48 could still pass. YIKES

Your friends in St. Louis are pulling for you!  This is one of the most backwards initiatives I've ever heard of, but it looks like cool heads will prevail.  I still can't understand how a city like Cincinnati could possibly have elected as many Republican council/aldermen as it has, but nevertheless, I hope this measure is defeated handily.  STREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEETCARS!!!!!

 

Mike Allen (council candidate and former Hamilton County Prosecutor) on WLW saying that he worked ten different polling places today and he thinks a lot of people were confused by the "Yes means No" thing.

I'm worried, because at this point westside republicans are still not counted.  (according to the live city cam)

I'm worried, because at this point westside republicans are still not counted.  (according to the live city cam)

 

Uh oh.

 

:drunk:

^^ Does this suggest that the precincts are counted in the same order each election?

Yes, in that the further away from downtown you are, the longer it takes for ballots to arrive downtown.  So, downtown (more democratic) neighborhoods are counted first traditionally.

Someone please answer me-- how are there that many Republicans in the City of Cincinnati????!?!?!!?!  I just don't get it.  If Cincy's peer cities are any measure, about 85%+ of registered voters should be Dems.  What is up with Cincinnati?  This is a question I've had for many, many years.  Please-- someone tell me why Cincy is so different from most older major cities in this regard.  Please.

jivecity: great question.  I suppose its because the region as a whole is just so super saturated with republicans that they actually leak into the city limits instead of staying in the suburbs.

Calm yourselves!  The westside republicans don't reside within city limits..... anymore!  :wink:  We got this!

It's not as easy as saying it's just the Republicans trying to block this. The primary anti-streetcar voice has been, unbelievably, the leader of the local NAACP, though I suspect a lot of his opposition stems from his personal loathing for Cincinnati's current mayor (a Dem). He's certainly turning his back on the national NAACP position on urban rail transit.

 

Much of the Republican/Tea Party anti-tax opposition is coming, predictably, from the burbs. And fortunately, they have no vote.

 

If there is a conservative bastion within city limits, it's the west side, which is why so many of us are biting our nails awaiting those precincts to report.

It's just baffling.  By all outward appearances, my city (St. Louis) is very comparable to Cincinnati-- and Cleveland, for that matter.  But St. Louis has 28 alderman, all but one of which are Democrats.  The one Independent alderman is much more progressive than the establishment Dems.  A Republican simply could never be elected in the City of St. Louis.  It's been that way for decades.  I believe it's much the same case in Cleveland and Pittsburgh.  How is Cincinnati so disparate on this?  This is not to pit city vs. city; I'm seriously trying to understand the bizarre politics of the Queen City.

Exactly - in this topsy turvy world we have a group that should be leading the charge for mass transit cozying up with right wing-nut anti-tax types.  This has created a strange alliance with some Democratic and conservative influence.

According to tweet from @917wvxu:

 

"Issue 48 tightens yet again with 96% of precincts reporting -- 49.42% / Against: 50.58%"

 

Good grief ...

 

:drunk: :drunk: :drunk: :drunk: :drunk:

What's the threshold for recounts and all that on issues elections?

According to tweet from @917wvxu:

 

"Issue 48 tightens yet again with 96% of precincts reporting -- 49.42% / Against: 50.58%"

 

Good grief ...

 

:drunk: :drunk: :drunk: :drunk: :drunk:

 

HOLY SH** 

 

I had a feeling it would be close, but good grief!!!!

What's the threshold for recounts and all that on issues elections?

 

You can be sure that Chris Smitherman and COAST are already salivating at the chance to cry foul and demand a recount. If this doesn't go their way and they lose by just a few, they're going to hanging chad this to death.

Shocking to see it this close with what it would do to the city for a decade.

Failed by 700 votes. ;)

Thank GOD I took off work tomorrow.  I'm going to need to switch from beer to liquor REALLY soon.

I wonder what those raw numbers are - Channel 12 just showed No votes up by 800 with 93% of the precincts reporting.  This is damn close.

 

Oops - the 92% above is correct...school levy was at 93%.

Failed by 700 votes. ;)

 

And wouldn't that be ironic?

Turn out seems very very low.

Still 13 precincts to report

Still 13 precincts to report

 

And they're 13 very big precincts.

 

Torture, this is.

Hitting reload on the enquirer website. This is nail biting close....

How do you know how big they are?

51.5-48.5...1 precinct left!!!

It's under a minute to play in the fourth quarter and we lead by two ... but the other team has the ball.

99% - No up over 2k.

172 of 173 precincts reporting

 

Candidate/Issue Votes Percent

No                         35,469 51.5%

 

Yes                         33,449 48.5%

 

 

Nice!

 

A little breathing room there. 1 to go. Cmon!! it DOES feel like the 4th quarter of the game..

I have an ulcer.

YEAH WE WIN

You crack me up, Prok.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.