Jump to content

Featured Replies

You can buy an early pass for the Cincinnati streetcar tomorrow

 

The gift cards will go on sale tomorrow on the second floor of City Hall, at the Metro sales office in the Mercantile arcade across the street from Government Square and online at go-metro.com.

 

A $25 card will allow users unlimited streetcar rides for the first 15 days of service; a $50 card will allow users unlimited rides for the first 30 days, and $100 will allow unlimited rides for the first 60 days of service. There are 750 $25 cards available, 400 $50 cards and 350 $100 cards. If all of the cards sell, it would raise $73,750 for the project. The base streetcar fare is expected to be $1 for two hours of ridership.

  • Replies 32.3k
  • Views 1m
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • January is normally the lowest ridership month for the Cincinnati Streetcar.    In January 2023, the streetcar had higher ridership than any month in 2017, 2018, 2020 or 2021. It also had hi

  • As of today, the Connector has carried 1 million riders in 2023. This is the first time that the system has crossed this threshold in a calendar year.   Back when the streetcar was being deb

  • 30 minutes ago I got off the most jam-packed streetcar that I had been on since opening weekend.     It's absurd that none of the elected officials in this city are using this rec

Posted Images

I have this exact same problem right now and it infuriates me. My actual gas use last month was $4.65, but my hookup fee was $35. I get the shared use sentiment, but there's got to be some kind of better formula they can use to allocate the costs better.

 

Methinks the real infrastructure maintenance cost per dwelling is closer to the $7 amount than the $35.

It is kind of confusing that it doesn't scale at all. The line supplying my unit is also supplying the other 32 units in my building. You can't tell me that that stretch of gas line costs the same per unit to maintain as a line that is supplying two houses for 100 feet of line.

I had 700 WLW on the radio last night and the "preview" was for a 9:06 show, and I don't know who the host was.  But anyways, the preview was, "With the new streetcar loss of $15 million, is this the beginning of the end for Cincinnati?".

 

 

Sounds about right. 

 

Its just a shame the streetcar has:

-Bankrupted the city

-Turned us into Detroit

-Brought down our credit rating

-Forced us to fire police/fire fighters

- Stopped us from building the MLK Interchange

- Destroyed our road paving ability

-Destroyed our garbage collecting ability

-Forced us to not cap Ft Washington Way

-Completely prevented other neighborhoods from building anything

-Destroyed our ability to plow and salt roads for winter

 

 

I had 700 WLW on the radio last night and the "preview" was for a 9:06 show, and I don't know who the host was.  But anyways, the preview was, "With the new streetcar loss of $15 million, is this the beginning of the end for Cincinnati?".

 

 

Sounds about right. 

 

Its just a shame the streetcar has:

-Bankrupted the city

-Turned us into Detroit

-Brought down our credit rating

-Forced us to fire police/fire fighters

- Stopped us from building the MLK Interchange

- Destroyed our road paving ability

-Destroyed our garbage collecting ability

-Forced us to not cap Ft Washington Way

-Completely prevented other neighborhoods from building anything

-Destroyed our ability to plow and salt roads for winter

 

 

 

 

Cranley taking credit for the present budget surplus, even though the streetcar was supposed to destroy the city's finances.  It just comes down to Cranley not being about to shower his cronies with the funds that are now dedicated to the streetcar.  And his endless haggling over the operations both keeps him in the news as some sort of financial watchdog and buys him time to figure out a way to program the money in the pockets of his handlers and goons. 

 

You can buy an early pass for the Cincinnati streetcar tomorrow

 

The gift cards will go on sale tomorrow on the second floor of City Hall, at the Metro sales office in the Mercantile arcade across the street from Government Square and online at go-metro.com.

 

A $25 card will allow users unlimited streetcar rides for the first 15 days of service; a $50 card will allow users unlimited rides for the first 30 days, and $100 will allow unlimited rides for the first 60 days of service. There are 750 $25 cards available, 400 $50 cards and 350 $100 cards. If all of the cards sell, it would raise $73,750 for the project. The base streetcar fare is expected to be $1 for two hours of ridership.

 

Hmm. For another $40, you can extend that 60-day pass to cover the entire Zone 1 of the Metro network. If you make just 6 round trips out of the basin per month (or if you live outside the basin), you're better off getting the regular Metro monthly pass. Not to mention you can't use these for more than a year and a half.

 

The only reason I see these selling is to politically support the streetcar. Once the streetcar is a mundane reality, these prices won't fly. I guess it's smart to go ahead and capitalize on that support right now, while the whole thing is still abstract and ideological.

I had 700 WLW on the radio last night and the "preview" was for a 9:06 show, and I don't know who the host was.  But anyways, the preview was, "With the new streetcar loss of $15 million, is this the beginning of the end for Cincinnati?".

 

 

Sounds about right. 

 

Its just a shame the streetcar has:

-Bankrupted the city

-Turned us into Detroit

-Brought down our credit rating

-Forced us to fire police/fire fighters

- Stopped us from building the MLK Interchange

- Destroyed our road paving ability

-Destroyed our garbage collecting ability

-Forced us to not cap Ft Washington Way

-Completely prevented other neighborhoods from building anything

-Destroyed our ability to plow and salt roads for winter

 

 

 

 

Cranley taking credit for the present budget surplus, even though the streetcar was supposed to destroy the city's finances.  It just comes down to Cranley not being about to shower his cronies with the funds that are now dedicated to the streetcar.  And his endless haggling over the operations both keeps him in the news as some sort of financial watchdog and buys him time to figure out a way to program the money in the pockets of his handlers and goons.

 

 

You can buy an early pass for the Cincinnati streetcar tomorrow

 

The gift cards will go on sale tomorrow on the second floor of City Hall, at the Metro sales office in the Mercantile arcade across the street from Government Square and online at go-metro.com.

 

A $25 card will allow users unlimited streetcar rides for the first 15 days of service; a $50 card will allow users unlimited rides for the first 30 days, and $100 will allow unlimited rides for the first 60 days of service. There are 750 $25 cards available, 400 $50 cards and 350 $100 cards. If all of the cards sell, it would raise $73,750 for the project. The base streetcar fare is expected to be $1 for two hours of ridership.

 

Hmm. For another $40, you can extend that 60-day pass to cover the entire Zone 1 of the Metro network. If you make just 6 round trips out of the basin per month (or if you live outside the basin), you're better off getting the regular Metro monthly pass. Not to mention you can't use these for more than a year and a half.

 

The only reason I see these selling is to politically support the streetcar. Once the streetcar is a mundane reality, these prices won't fly. I guess it's smart to go ahead and capitalize on that support right now, while the whole thing is still abstract and ideological.

 

I will certainly buy a card to support the streetcar, but these pass options are a little bizarre. Why not treat it like a special Metro gift card that is valid anytime after the streetcar's opening date, but dedicate all of that revenue to streetcar start-up costs?

You can buy an early pass for the Cincinnati streetcar tomorrow

 

The gift cards will go on sale tomorrow on the second floor of City Hall, at the Metro sales office in the Mercantile arcade across the street from Government Square and online at go-metro.com.

 

A $25 card will allow users unlimited streetcar rides for the first 15 days of service; a $50 card will allow users unlimited rides for the first 30 days, and $100 will allow unlimited rides for the first 60 days of service. There are 750 $25 cards available, 400 $50 cards and 350 $100 cards. If all of the cards sell, it would raise $73,750 for the project. The base streetcar fare is expected to be $1 for two hours of ridership.

 

Hmm. For another $40, you can extend that 60-day pass to cover the entire Zone 1 of the Metro network. If you make just 6 round trips out of the basin per month (or if you live outside the basin), you're better off getting the regular Metro monthly pass. Not to mention you can't use these for more than a year and a half.

 

The only reason I see these selling is to politically support the streetcar. Once the streetcar is a mundane reality, these prices won't fly. I guess it's smart to go ahead and capitalize on that support right now, while the whole thing is still abstract and ideological.

 

I will certainly buy a card to support the streetcar, but these pass options are a little bizarre. Why not treat it like a special Metro gift card that is valid anytime after the streetcar's opening date, but dedicate all of that revenue to streetcar start-up costs?

 

That is exactly what I thought it was going to be when "gift cards" were first announced. Since that's the way most gift cards operate -- as cash that can only be used at one company. Maybe they didn't want the PR where Cratherman/Smitherley claimed this was a sleight of hand to transfer bus fare to streetcar operations.

The city needs to play hardball with Duke by saying to them when it comes times to replace a line they must have their own right of way and not under the street. Maybe under the side walk.

The city needs to play hardball with Duke by saying to them when it comes times to replace a line they must have their own right of way and not under the street. Maybe under the side walk.

 

At the very least, the city needs to increase the fee that it charges Duke to use the right-of-way.

October 2014 update can be found here:

http://city-egov.cincinnati-oh.gov/Webtop/ws/council/public/child/Blob/41327.pdf?rpp=-10&m=2&w=doc_no%3D%27201401449%27

 

The report includes some update on the contingency fund saying that 34% of the contingency has been used, and with 18 months of construction remaining there is concern that the contingency will not be enough to complete the project. I really hope that is just being extremely cautious, because if more money needs to be allocated to complete phase 1 that would be a mess.

Didn't we lose close to $1 million because of the delay?

From what i recall, yes it was ~$1million or so in delay costs.

^If we end up $1M short, I can't wait to see the headlines.

Proud Owner:

"It's just fate, as usual, keeping its bargain and screwing us in the fine print..." - John Crichton

Logo looks great!

Logo looks great!

 

Very slick! Heavy modern take on it.

Now I want some Euros!

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Now I want some Euros!

 

Here you go.

 

 

Proud Owner:

 

Love that logo!!!

I ordered a pass online. I'm debating whether to give it as a gift or keep for myself.

 

https://secure.pledgeconnect.com/payment.aspx?go-metro

 

I got one too, I was hoping for a cheaper option like $10 so I could give them out as stocking stuffers or gag gifts for suburbanites.

It's official!

 

Logo5.jpg

 

Logo3.jpg

 

Logo4.jpg

 

Logo1.jpg

 

Logo2.jpg

Sexy

Does it start at first use or when the streetcar opens? Someone may want to start using it 3 months after the streetcar opens.

The graphic design is impressive. Sleek and contemporary. Nods to the art deco aesthetic present in several of our landmarks. The C is reminiscent of the city's flag. Bravo.

 

Edit: And of course the color scheme, which was picked to echo the old transit system colors. (For what it's worth. I'm not attached.)

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherma has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

In the fine print for the card; they go in affect starting on the first day of revenue service. It's commemorative card. I get to call myself a Founding Club Member. I plan on impressing the ladies with it.

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherma has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

 

Project managers are predicting that there will be 80k left in contingency once the project is complete barring any unforeseen setbacks. Right now there is approx $6M left in contingency, but most will be used during CBD Construction.

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherma has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

 

They have used 34% of the $9.7 million contingency. There's $6.4 million left.

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherman has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

 

Would anyone sign a petition much less vote against the streetcar if it does go a little over budget?  There is no way there are enough people stupid enough to buy what he is peddling.

"Someone is sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago." - Warren Buffett 

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherma has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

 

They have used 34% of the $9.7 million contingency. There's $6.4 million left.

 

The big issue with the contingency fund was the December 2013 delay that cost $1M of additional expenses that could eventually be higher than that after negotiations. That money comes directly out of contingency fund...so take the delay out and there is a lot more wiggle room in the contingency.

 

Deatrick said there is $2M+ in pending expenses plus he foresees $2.2M+ in upcoming expenses...leaving something like $80K left after those two grouped expenses.

^ There is no way. I doubt he'd even get one other vote on Council for that. Let him talk.

Is it true there is only 80k left in contingency? ??

 

That's a major problem especially when we have politicians actively trying to increase costs through various methods.

 

Smitherma has repeatedly said he will bring another ballot initiative If the cost goes even one penny over

 

They have used 34% of the $9.7 million contingency. There's $6.4 million left.

 

According to those numbers, $3.3m has been spent in contingency funds.

 

If $1m is from Cranley's "pause," that means 30.3% of the money spent was directly caused by unnecessary obstruction.

Oh Enquirer...  :roll:

 

Uh-oh, streetcar savings account almost empty

 

With two more years until the streetcar is up and running, streetcar executive John Deatrick told a Cincinnati City Council committee on Tuesday that the project's construction contingency fund is almost gone.

 

That's the money needed to pay for cost overruns and surprise expenses. The $148 million project is a little more than a third done. It is scheduled to begin running in September 2016.

 

The contingency fund once held $9.7 million. Deatrick told council's Transportation Committee Tuesday that $4.4 million has been spent and there are $2.9 million in pending expenses. Plus he can see another $2.2 million is needed. That leaves a balance of $80,443.

 

"It's just fate, as usual, keeping its bargain and screwing us in the fine print..." - John Crichton

Worst case: Only $80,000 left in streetcar contingency budget with months of construction to go

 

Deatrick and Eilerman explained that:

 

The city has spent $4.4 million of the contingency budget. About $1 million stems from council's decision to freeze the project a year ago to consider whether to cancel it.

 

Another $3 million in contingency expenses are pending. Included in that is $1.06 million in city staff and contractual expenses. Some of those costs, which include some overtime for the roughly dozen city employees who work full or part-time on the project, also stem from delays associated with awarding the construction contract and the pause approved by council.

 

They are estimating another $2.25 million in expenses will be needed given the trouble areas on the project so far.

Deatrick, who is expected to meet with Mayor John Cranley and City Manager Harry Black about the contingency budget on Wednesday, said he hopes to reduce the pending and estimated contingency expenses to give the city more breathing room on the project.

 

Murray – a Republican who opposed the streetcar last year but has embraced her role as transportation chairwoman and tried to make the project work – praised Deatrick and Eilerman for bringing the issues to council early. She said the project needs to remain within budget but left open the possibility that the city could find local grant money, possibly from the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments, to ease the pressure.

Where's the "I already got mine!" option?

I think what I'm getting out of all this is that the depletion of the contingency fund was largely CAUSED by the somewhat-pointless and politically-motivated delay.  Am I right?

You're right. If it wasn't for Cranley, the article would have read "good news, streetcar over 1 million under budget".

The cranley delay rising costs was so predictable and since everyone keeps telling me how brilliant he is, that means he knew all along how much it would cost and where the money would come from.  So when he states after elected that it wouldn't cost much or won't cost anything (forgot which he said), he was lying

 

Unfortunately I have a feeling were going to see more efforts to intentionally increase construction costs and deplete the contingency funds from the same characters

 

Ordinarily this problem would stick to cranley like glue.  It would be called some catchy name.  But our local media is so inept that they wont. Enquirer will stir up another controversy and am radio will defend cranley. 

 

I got a feeling we are going to see a coordinated cranley Smitherman am radio tour today to go on the offensive to help people forget they are responsible for increasing costs

He didn't think of the delay cost because he thought he would win. This wasn't a part of his calculation.

^Exactly. I think he even said in an interview that he proposed the pause because that made it much easier for him to actually cancel. That was after he failed, and I was surprised that he admitted it out loud. Very different than what he claimed pre-pause.

^Exactly. I think he even said in an interview that he proposed the pause because that made it much easier for him to actually cancel. That was after he failed, and I was surprised that he admitted it out loud. Very different than what he claimed pre-pause.

 

And our lazy local media never called him out on this lie. I pointed this out to a few reporters and their response was, "of course he wanted to cancel it all along." Sure, but the point is that he lied and claimed the purpose of that pause was the audit the project, not to inflict a near-fatal wound to it.

Any cost overruns is meaning less at this point. Too much already invested. Get it done or be the laughing stock of the country.

Any cost overruns is meaning less at this point. Too much already invested. Get it done or be the laughing stock of the country.

 

Right.

^Exactly. I think he even said in an interview that he proposed the pause because that made it much easier for him to actually cancel. That was after he failed, and I was surprised that he admitted it out loud. Very different than what he claimed pre-pause.

 

And our lazy local media never called him out on this lie. I pointed this out to a few reporters and their response was, "of course he wanted to cancel it all along." Sure, but the point is that he lied and claimed the purpose of that pause was the audit the project, not to inflict a near-fatal wound to it.

 

Was the pause even Cranely's idea? Or did he just go ahead with it?

^Exactly. I think he even said in an interview that he proposed the pause because that made it much easier for him to actually cancel. That was after he failed, and I was surprised that he admitted it out loud. Very different than what he claimed pre-pause.

 

And our lazy local media never called him out on this lie. I pointed this out to a few reporters and their response was, "of course he wanted to cancel it all along." Sure, but the point is that he lied and claimed the purpose of that pause was the audit the project, not to inflict a near-fatal wound to it.

 

Was the pause even Cranely's idea? Or did he just go ahead with it?

 

Cranley orchestrated it when he didn't have 5 votes to straight-up Crancel the project immediately. Flynn and Mann went along with it (along with Murray, Winburn, and Smitherman).

 

It was good for Cranley because it meant 6 votes, instead of 5, were required to not-Crancel. Hence the supporters' need for Flynn (who played ball harder than Mann). I have to think Mann felt duped when he realized he essentially ceded his power to Cranley and Flynn, on top of wasting $1m for no reason.

Vice Mayor Mann stipulated the need for the audit right after the election. Because the audit would take some time, that's the reason for the pause.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.