Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

One of three federally-constructed greenbelt villages...

 

2008_0628Columbus0087.jpg

 

Community building

2008_0628Columbus0127.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0081.jpg

 

Those used to be windows

2008_0628Columbus0078.jpg

 

Community pool

2008_0628Columbus0086.jpg

 

Shopping center

2008_0628Columbus0122.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0123.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0132.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0065.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0064.jpg

 

Community green

2008_0628Columbus0125.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0124.jpg

 

Housing...

2008_0628Columbus0112.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0099.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0103.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0108.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0104.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0109.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0110.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0114.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0115.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0117.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0120.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0116.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0131.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0133.jpg

 

2008_0628Columbus0118.jpg

 

The federal government acquired 5,930 acres for the project: 530 for the village itself, 2,045 for the greenbelt (Winton Woods), and 3,400 for an agriculture belt. Unfortunately, the agricultural property was sold off for Forest Park, one of Cincinnati's most dismal suburbs.

2008_0628Columbus0088.jpg

Thanks!

"You don't just walk into a bar and mix it up by calling a girl fat" - buildingcincinnati speaking about new forumers

Great post.  There is an older post about Greenhills floating around here that I seem to remember..

 

It's always great to see it.  Most of the buildings in Greenhills are one of a kind (well, there are 3 "greenbelt towns" but, almost one of a kind..).  It's a shame some of the houses/apartment blocks are being torn down and replaced with modular homes...

These "greenbelt" villages aren't so green (all cars, no bikes) and they're ugly. Thanks for taking the effort, though!

These "greenbelt" villages aren't so green (all cars, no bikes) and they're ugly. Thanks for taking the effort, though!

 

Greenhills accomodates bikes and pedestrians well enough, but its lack of density and mixed uses encourages automobile use. While I would not use the term ugly, I do agree that parts are not all that pretty. Some bits are quite quaint, however; I would take it over modern suburbia anyday.

I actually like Greenhills.  It's surrounded entirely by Winton Woods, and is pretty self contained, which is kind of charming.  I also don't think Forest Park is all that bad, and certainly wouldn't call it one of the most dismal. 

was this community started in the 20s/30s? Its just hard to believe that a community out in western Ohio just popped up.

^ It was constructed during the Great Depression by the government, with the intention being relocating people from urban slums to rural, small town like communities that were close enough to major cities to take advantage of them.  An early example of suburbanization, really.  While it isn't very mixed use today, it was designed to be a modernist small town, and be mostly self sufficient.  The current tenants in the shopping center aren't varied enough to fill the purpose, though, and close proximity of large scale retail is ther reason for that; when the town was built there weren't any shopping centers around. 

 

Greenhills "town center" is also a very early example of a strip mall.  The modernist designers of the town thought it would be a nice alternative to the main streets of older rural towns.

Not bad, but prefer Glendale just to the east.

 

Thanks for the pics!

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.