Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Dev said:


Wouldn't devolution be contradictory to the stated goals? Part of the reason we are in this hole is because the Feds do not require prioritizing maintenance for the funds they send to the states, so they squander the majority of it on expansions. That requirement was in the infrastructure bill but it got pulled out of the Senate version.

Actually, it's that the feds pay 80% of the cost of new capacity but 0% for maintenance. 

 

I don't know how well the idea would work.  I thought it might get a conversation going, which it did. 

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 161
  • Views 13.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Yup  

  • There may be a better way to do this without creating the ruckus with state DOTs.  It could also do an end-run around highway interests.  Because car-centric development patterns are incapable of gene

Posted Images

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • 4 weeks later...

These socialist roads

 

When is the last time I-71 turned a profit?

  • 3 months later...

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

31 minutes ago, KJP said:

 

I would highly doubt that and would question the dubious sources he may have used here. Just using HUD numbers for housing vs parking leaves out a ton of the story.  

  • 8 months later...

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Reminds me of this sad sight I see every Thursday afternoon....Clevelanders lining up in their cars for hours because they can't afford food....

foodbank line.jpeg

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

^Remember how before 2000 people used to find out how expensive the insurance was on a vehicle BEFORE they bought it to make sure it wasn't too high? They would cross-shop different vehicles based on the insurance cost and wouldn't buy an SUV if it was too expensive to insure as compared to say, a Camry. Now they don't do that at all. They're getting what they want no matter the insurance cost. It's considered incidental.

  • 1 month later...

If walking costs you $1, we all pay $0.01. If biking costs you $1, we all pay $0.08. If bussing costs you $1, we all pay $1.50. If driving costs you $1, we all pay $9.20. Via @thediscourse study.

 

This isn’t just about choice. It’s about who pays for your choice.

20240314_092950.jpg

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

  • 2 months later...

Oh those crazy 15-minute-city commies

 

 

"In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage." -- John Steinbeck

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.